On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 1:05 PM Michael Richardson
wrote:
>
> Martin Björklund wrote:
> >> This is important to know, as the intention with the augmentation
> was
> >> to extend the voucher with additional values as you did in the
> example
> >> above.
>
> > Ok. Just to be
Martin Björklund wrote:
>> This is important to know, as the intention with the augmentation was
>> to extend the voucher with additional values as you did in the example
>> above.
> Ok. Just to be clear; this is not what is defined today. In order to
> get this, 8366bis
Martin Björklund wrote:
>> And then Module D wishes to inherit from B and C :-)
> "inherit from" is quite generic; I would need to see a detailed
> example of the definitions you envision in B, C and D to give
> guidelines.
Yes, you are right.
>> In practical terms, this
"Fries, Steffen" wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thank your for your effort to come up with the concrete example. This
> certainly illustrates the approach better. I made some inline note to
> your points
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Björklund
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2022
Hi Martin,
Thank your for your effort to come up with the concrete example. This certainly
illustrates the approach better. I made some inline note to your points
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Björklund
> Sent: Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2022 08:50
> To: mcr+i...@sandelman.ca
> Cc:
