Amanda, Carsten, Rob, based upon the discussion this week, we will still need
brski.jp.
We will also still need brski.rjp, but the latter will be different in its
description.
I think that it's best to just defer the IANA actions until the document is
revised.
Rob, I think that the document
n't need full consensus to perform the registration now already.
>
> Regards
> Esko
>
> -Original Message-
> From: core-parameters On Behalf Of
> Amanda Baber via RT
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2022 02:27
> Cc: jaime.jime...@ericsson.com; c...@tzi.org; core-paramet...
n't need full consensus to perform the registration now already.
>
> Regards
> Esko
>
> -Original Message-
> From: core-parameters On Behalf Of
> Amanda Baber via RT
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2022 02:27
> Cc: jaime.jime...@ericsson.com; c...@tzi.org; core-paramet...
now already.
>
> Regards
> Esko
>
> -Original Message-
> From: core-parameters On Behalf Of
> Amanda Baber via RT
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2022 02:27
> Cc: jaime.jime...@ericsson.com; c...@tzi.org; core-paramet...@ietf.org
> Subject: [core-parameters] [IA
now already.
>
> Regards
> Esko
>
> -Original Message-
> From: core-parameters On Behalf Of
> Amanda Baber via RT
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2022 02:27
> Cc: jaime.jime...@ericsson.com; c...@tzi.org; core-paramet...@ietf.org
> Subject: [core-parameters] [IA
now already.
>
> Regards
> Esko
>
> -Original Message-
> From: core-parameters On Behalf Of
> Amanda Baber via RT
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2022 02:27
> Cc: jaime.jime...@ericsson.com; c...@tzi.org; core-paramet...@ietf.org
> Subject: [core-parameters] [IA
Hi Carsten, Jaime (cc: anima),
Can you approve the Resource Type (rt=) Link Target Attribute Values
registrations in version -11 of this document?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy
thanks,
Amanda
On Thu Apr 07 21:44:01 2022, sabrina.tanamal wrote:
>
Carsten Bormann wrote:
> IP address in the authority than the request address). For brski.rjp,
> this appears to be about discovering an entry point for a protocol that
> I don’t seem to fully understand the description for.
> I didn’t try to obtain a deep understanding of the
Hi Sabrina,
I looked at the registration requests in the draft.
They use somewhat unusual language about discovering ports - resource discovery
is understood to discover resources. For brski.jp, this appears to be about
discovering a CoAP or CoAPs entry point (without describing how exactly
Carsten and Jaime (cc: anima WG),
As the designated experts for the Resource Type (rt=) Link Target Attribute
Values registry, can you review the proposed registrations in
draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy for us? Please see
10 matches
Mail list logo
