Now, I am replying to myself, and doing so, for the purposes of an
abuse complaint notification.
How this works:
1. I do understand that many of the multiple replies I am receiving
from the abusive person, is not on the emailing list itself.
2. The reason I am posting this on the emailing list
On any mailing list it is not acceptable to reply to yourself.
https://www.google.com/search?q=netiquette
Multiple times, doing that same unacceptable thing: Is abuse.
(and abusive behavior)
No opinion, simple fact.
This being an abuse discussion list - it is an abuse of an abuse
emailing list
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:22:55 +
HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker wrote:
> as for droning on... so far, this mailinglist, for the past month or
> so has been:
>
> spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam
>
> and 1 mail: law enforcement requests to the ripe ncc (a total of 4 in
> 2016)
ard to Kea.
Marilson
From: Gert Doering
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 1:19 PM
To: Marilson
Cc: Shane Kerr ; anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] WG Chair Mailing List Decision
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 04:22:55PM +, HRH Prince Sven Olaf
von CyberBunker wrote:
cuz we thought it should be more like 'ddos ddos ddos' 'hijacked
prefix' 'ddos' 'mass hack' 'ddos' 'someone switched off the
electricity' 'someone cut some fibers'...'spamhaus illegally
scraped the ripe db for m
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 06:55:40AM -0800, Suresh Ramasubramanian
wrote:
Do name names. Who ??? according to you ??? is a sockpuppet
here? Or a troll?
You know who you are. It's a matter of simple traffic analysis.
If a message decrying the NCC and its members as a hive of
villainy appears here,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 04:45:54PM +, Brian Nisbet wrote:
We are not here to talk about other instances. This is about one
instance. There does need to be further conversation about the
AA-WG community and the list.
Agree.
There is quite a lot of material that did not make it to the
list
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 04:19:15PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
There is a fine line between "freedom of speech" and "violating
the freedom of others".
An argument used exclusively by wannabe censors over the
centuries. I consider it discredited.
Anyone should be free to state their opinions.
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:44:16PM -0200, Marilson wrote:
> I may not agree to any of the words you say, but I will defend to the death
> the right of you to say them.
There is a fine line between "freedom of speech" and "violating the
freedom of others".
Anyone should be free to state thei
say it.
Shane, I hope I have clarified my position better.
Greetings
Marilson
From: Shane Kerr
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 10:41 AM
To: Marilson
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] WG Chair Mailing List Decision
Chair Mailing List Decision (ox)
6. Re: WG Chair Mailing List Decision (Brian Nisbet)
--
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:05:19 +
From: Brian Nisbet
To: "'anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net'"
Cc: "aa-wg-ch...@ripe.net"
Subject: [anti-abuse-wg] WG Chair Mailing List D
Sascha,
Sascha Luck [ml] wrote on 16/02/2017 14:40:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:05:19PM +, Brian Nisbet wrote:
This morning Tobias and I asked the NCC to take the very unusual
step, effectively immediately, of removing the person behind
sv...@xs4all.nl from the Anti-Abuse WG mailing list. Th
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:40:02 +
"Sascha Luck [ml]" wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:05:19PM +, Brian Nisbet wrote:
> >This morning Tobias and I asked the NCC to take the very unusual
> >step, effectively immediately, of removing the person behind
> >sv...@xs4all.nl from the Anti-Abuse WG
Do name names. Who – according to you – is a sockpuppet here? Or a troll?
All I see in this email is a series of stream of consciousness accusations but
zero specifics.
To be plain – I think many people on this list, you included, have zero
background in abuse mitigation, and engaging in any so
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:05:19PM +, Brian Nisbet wrote:
This morning Tobias and I asked the NCC to take the very unusual
step, effectively immediately, of removing the person behind
sv...@xs4all.nl from the Anti-Abuse WG mailing list. This was
not done lightly, rather it was done to safegua
Colleagues,
This morning Tobias and I asked the NCC to take the very unusual step,
effectively immediately, of removing the person behind sv...@xs4all.nl
from the Anti-Abuse WG mailing list. This was not done lightly, rather
it was done to safeguard this community.
We would ask the members not to
16 matches
Mail list logo
