Re: [AOLSERVER] Officially dropping support for nsxml?

2004-07-06 Thread Dossy
On 2004.07.06, Andrew Piskorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But I think the debate on "ns_xml vs. tDOM, which should we > standardize on?" was over a long time ago. tDOM won unanimously. Has > anything important changed since then? It seems unlikely. The debate for the OpenACS audience was ove

Re: [AOLSERVER] Officially dropping support for nsxml?

2004-07-06 Thread Andrew Piskorski
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 03:24:37PM -0400, Dossy wrote: > In Longer-term plans, I'd like to standardize around one or the other > (i.e., nsxml vs. tDOM) and as tDOM is also used by the stand-alone Tcl > audience, I'm hoping it will receive more support and thorough testing. > Choosing tDOM as the s

Re: [AOLSERVER] Retiring the SourceForge "Patches" tracker

2004-07-06 Thread Dossy
On 2004.07.06, Stephen Deasey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Only the person who opens a bug (and perhaps admins???) can attach files > to a bug report, i.e. a patch. If you remove the patch tacker you'll > have to fix all the bugs yourself... :-) Ah, this is annoying. I filed RFE #986263 at Sour

Re: [AOLSERVER] Retiring the SourceForge "Patches" tracker

2004-07-06 Thread Stephen Deasey
Only the person who opens a bug (and perhaps admins???) can attach files to a bug report, i.e. a patch. If you remove the patch tacker you'll have to fix all the bugs yourself... :-) On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 09:06, Dossy wrote: > I want to ask if anyone finds any use or value in having a separate

Re: [AOLSERVER] Officially dropping support for nsxml?

2004-07-06 Thread Dossy
On 2004.07.06, Elliott Phil Civ AFMSA/SGSID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What kind of application does one use tDom on? What is its strengths > & weeknesses? -phil tDOM provides APIs to Tcl for XML DOM parsing using the Expat parser underneath. See: http://www.tdom.org/ nsxml, I believe,

[AOLSERVER] Tcl 2004 conference: is anyone attending?

2004-07-06 Thread Dossy
I'm wondering if there will be any AOLserver users attending this year's Tcl 2004 conference. If so, is anyone interested in presenting a paper there? -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Panoptic Computer Network web: http://www.panoptic.com/ "H

Re: [AOLSERVER] Officially dropping support for nsxml?

2004-07-06 Thread Elliott Phil Civ AFMSA/SGSID
What kind of application does one use tDom on? What is its strengths & weeknesses? -phil -Original Message- From: AOLserver Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Krenzer Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 1:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] Officially dro

Re: [AOLSERVER] Officially dropping support for nsxml?

2004-07-06 Thread Dossy
On 2004.07.02, Greg Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We use nsxml in our production code at BNA. [...] We don't care if you > want to declare nsxml dead. On 2004.07.06, Matthew Krenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yea, we are using nsxml in a production environment here, but feel > free to close

Re: [AOLSERVER] Retiring the SourceForge "Patches" tracker

2004-07-06 Thread Dossy
First, for everyone who gets SourceForge change notifications via email, I want to apologize for the spew of email you all got -- I totally didn't think to turn off the "send email notification" setting while I was going through and making the change. The good news: all of the tickets in the old "

Re: [AOLSERVER] Ns_TclEval on v40_r5 returns -1

2004-07-06 Thread Mike Schilli
Mark Page wrote on 7/6/2004, 11:04 AM: Ugh. Ok, I missed this on the first round.  You've reversed arguments 2 & 3 on the call to Ns_TclEval.  From the docs: D'uh, how stupid of me! Thanks much for pointing that out. -- -- Mike Mike Schilli [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- AOLserver - http://ww

Re: [AOLSERVER] Officially dropping support for nsxml?

2004-07-06 Thread Daniel P. Stasinski
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 11:28, Matthew Krenzer wrote: > Yea, we are using nsxml in a production environment here, Same here. It's used on half a dozen servers here. Perhaps some day I'll migrate it to tDom but I'm in no hurry. Daniel -- | --

Re: [AOLSERVER] Officially dropping support for nsxml?

2004-07-06 Thread Matthew Krenzer
Yea, we are using nsxml in a production environment here, but feel free to close the tickets and declare it obsolete anyway. We've pretty much been running under that assumption for the last year or so anyway. Someday when I get more time I'll move over to tDom, but for right now everything is wo

Re: [AOLSERVER] Ns_TclEval on v40_r5 returns -1

2004-07-06 Thread Mark Page
Ugh. Ok, I missed this on the first round.  You've reversed arguments 2 & 3 on the call to Ns_TclEval.  From the docs: int Ns_TclEval (Ns_DString *pds,char *hServerchar *script); Examples Use this code to call ns_sendmail from C: NS_DStringVarAppend(&dsScript, "ns_s

Re: [AOLSERVER] Ns_TclEval on v40_r5 returns -1

2004-07-06 Thread Mike Schilli
Mark Page wrote on 7/6/2004, 6:14 AM: Is it true that this code fragment will be running from a 'connection' thread -- e.g., servicing a connection.   Use of the Ns_GetConn function implies that it is. Are there any messages in your server log when you run this? Correct, it's being used b

[AOLSERVER] Change in venue for "official" AOLserver chats

2004-07-06 Thread Dossy
Since turn-out on the AIM chat room was poor, and there are many more people on IRC on a regular basis, I'm changing the official venue for AOLserver chats to IRC. irc.freenode.net:6667, channel #aolserver Everyone, please feel free to join us there. Soon, I'd like to schedule regular bug scrubs

Re: [AOLSERVER] Retiring the SourceForge "Patches" tracker

2004-07-06 Thread Dossy
On 2004.07.06, Robert Seeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does the patches tracker also track those patches for RFEs? I'm not > suggesting that thats a reason to keep, just a consideration if it > does. Yes, there is a "Feature Requests" aka "RFE" tracker. On 2004.07.06, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL

Re: [AOLSERVER] Retiring the SourceForge "Patches" tracker

2004-07-06 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic
On Tuesday 06 July 2004 17:06, Dossy wrote: > I want to ask if anyone finds any use or value in having a separate > "Patches" tracker at SourceForge. It seems to me the only difference > between the Bugs and Patches trackers is that a "Patch" is a Bug with a > suggested patch to fix it. > There i

Re: [AOLSERVER] Retiring the SourceForge "Patches" tracker

2004-07-06 Thread Robert Seeger
Does the patches tracker also track those patches for RFEs? I'm not suggesting that thats a reason to keep, just a consideration if it does. Rob Seeger Dossy wrote on 7/6/2004, 11:06 AM: > I want to ask if anyone finds any use or value in having a separate > "Patches" tracker at SourceForge.

[AOLSERVER] Retiring the SourceForge "Patches" tracker

2004-07-06 Thread Dossy
I want to ask if anyone finds any use or value in having a separate "Patches" tracker at SourceForge. It seems to me the only difference between the Bugs and Patches trackers is that a "Patch" is a Bug with a suggested patch to fix it. I'm inclined to retire the Patches tracker and move all "patc

[AOLSERVER] Tentative release of 4.0.6 this week

2004-07-06 Thread Dossy
Sometime this week, I'd like to tag and release AOLserver 4.0.6. Are there any currently outstanding bugs or features that should hold up this release? Take a moment to review the trackers at SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=3152 -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara

Re: [AOLSERVER] Ns_TclEval on v40_r5 returns -1

2004-07-06 Thread Mark Page
Is it true that this code fragment will be running from a 'connection' thread -- e.g., servicing a connection.   Use of the Ns_GetConn function implies that it is. Are there any messages in your server log when you run this? Mike Schilli wrote on 7/5/2004, 8:53 PM: Hi there, I'm usi