On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:02:06PM +0200, Agustin Lopez wrote:
> Really it is 8.4.11.
> I am using a debian testing package.
Does that Debian package build Tcl multi-threaded, or single threaded?
--
Andrew Piskorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.piskorski.com/
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolse
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 06:39:43PM +0200, Jean-Fabrice RABAUTE wrote:
> AOLServer was not compiled with debugging symbol (not tcl...).
> If it can help I can recompile both with debugging symbols so I can have
> more info on the next crash.
Yes, that would be a good idea. In fact, with gcc, AFAI
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:38:01PM +0100, Stuart Children wrote:
> Initially I thought bash was misbehaving, but in fact inspecting the
> environment, it's just following its stated behaviour. This is because
> even though we've changed uid, $USER is "root" and $BASH_ENV is
> "/root/.bashrc" (s
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:57:20PM -0400, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
> The upside is that, yes, the AOLserver Wiki is now running on MediaWiki,
http://panoptic.com/wiki/aolserver/Main_Page
What's with the Chinese spam links all over the front page of the
Wiki?
--
Andrew Piskorski <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 02:41:43PM -0700, John Caruso wrote:
> Ok, found this in the ChangeLog:
>
> * Removed the child-process privleged port Ns_SockListen
> code in nsd/binder.c. Binding privleged ports (e.g., port
> 80) now requires the -b or -B command line methods introduced
>
> Yeah, exactly. That's the number one reason why we have a web-service
> starting script that knows how to start each of the different possible web
> services, by service name only. But modifying that script to know which
> ports and IPs every service listens on--when that information is already
At Friday 04:17 PM 10/7/2005, Daniel P. Stasinski
wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 14:16
-0700, John Caruso wrote:
> In testing AOLserver 4.0.10, we seem to have discovered that the -b
> command-line parameter is now required to bind to privileged ports
(e.g.
> 80 or 443).
The problem with this -
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 14:16 -0700, John Caruso wrote:
> In testing AOLserver 4.0.10, we seem to have discovered that the -b
> command-line parameter is now required to bind to privileged ports (e.g.
> 80 or 443).
The problem with this -B and -b stuff is that in /etc/inittab, the
process sectio
At Friday 02:16 PM 10/7/2005, John Caruso wrote:
1) Is it true that AOLserver
4.0.10 requires -b in this circumstance, or are we just missing
something?
Ok, found this in the ChangeLog:
* Removed the child-process privleged port
Ns_SockListen
code in nsd/binder.c. Binding privleged
po
In testing AOLserver 4.0.10, we seem to have discovered that the -b
command-line parameter is now required to bind to privileged ports (e.g.
80 or 443). With AOLserver 3.4.2, you could simply specify the port
numbers in the config file and AOLserver would do the Right Thing.
So two questions:
Really it is 8.4.11.
I am using a debian testing package.
borrador:~# tclsh
% info patchlevel
8.4.11
Regards,
Agustin
> On 2005.10.07, Agustin Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > We have daily crashes of aolserver (4.0.10) with tcl 8.4.10.
> > That is the log (simplified) for date / numt
On 2005.10.07, Agustin Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We have daily crashes of aolserver (4.0.10) with tcl 8.4.10.
> That is the log (simplified) for date / numthreads / mem wasted
[...]
> unable to alloc 2420042 bytes (CRASH!!!)
Are you really using Tcl 8.4.10? How did you get a multi-th
Hello!
We have daily crashes of aolserver (4.0.10) with tcl 8.4.10.
That is the log (simplified) for date / numthreads / mem wasted
279/09:44:23 4 408372
279/09:45:23 36 883504
279/09:46:23 36 908844
279/09:47:23 36 920352
279/09:48:23 36 930292
..
279/10:10:24 40 1097108
279/10:11:24 40 1115140
On 2005.10.07, Jeremy Henty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've been running AOLserver 3.3+ad13 without problems on Solaris 7.
> I've been trying to build and run 4.0.10 but when I test it by running
> "bin/nsd -ft nsd.tcl" the process just hangs. netstat says nothing is
> even listening on the por
Hi all,
2 weeks ago, I migrated an aolserver web site from AS4.0-SunOS 5.7 running
since months without troubles to an AS4.0.10/tcl 8.4.11 on Fedora Core 4.
Since then , The site crashes after 5 or 6 days of fine run. During the run,
everything is fine, without any troubles.
The crash is simple :
I wrote:
>I've been trying to build and run 4.0.10 but when I test it by running
>"bin/nsd
>-ft nsd.tcl" the process just hangs. netstat says nothing is even listening
>on the port. top reports that nsd is guzzling 99+% CPU and a SIZE of 1.5+G .
Update: after a few minutes:
unable to real
We've been running AOLserver 3.3+ad13 without problems on Solaris 7. I've
been trying to build and run 4.0.10 but when I test it by running "bin/nsd
-ft nsd.tcl" the process just hangs. netstat says nothing is even listening
on the port. top reports that nsd is guzzling 99+% CPU and a SIZE of
Yeah it cores like there's no tomorrow :-/
Haven't spent time looking at it myself either
P
Tom Jackson wrote:
On Friday 07 October 2005 07:03, Olaf Mersmann wrote:
Hi List,
what changes are necessary to the PHP module so that it supports
virtual hosts? I'd be willing to invest
Hi Dossy,
* Dossy Shiobara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051007 16:46]:
> On 2005.10.07, Olaf Mersmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > what changes are necessary to the PHP module so that it supports
> > virtual hosts? I'd be willing to invest some time in implementing this
> > if someone could give me
* Tom Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051007 16:56]:
> On Friday 07 October 2005 07:03, Olaf Mersmann wrote:
> > Hi List,
> >
> > what changes are necessary to the PHP module so that it supports
> > virtual hosts? I'd be willing to invest some time in implementing this
> > if someone could give me a f
On Friday 07 October 2005 07:03, Olaf Mersmann wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> what changes are necessary to the PHP module so that it supports
> virtual hosts? I'd be willing to invest some time in implementing this
> if someone could give me a few hints what needs to be done.
>
I have PHP running inside a
On 2005.10.07, Olaf Mersmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> what changes are necessary to the PHP module so that it supports
> virtual hosts? I'd be willing to invest some time in implementing this
> if someone could give me a few hints what needs to be done.
I wish I could answer this question
Hi List,
what changes are necessary to the PHP module so that it supports
virtual hosts? I'd be willing to invest some time in implementing this
if someone could give me a few hints what needs to be done.
Thanks in advance.
-- Olaf
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself
I ran into a problem yesterday when I had a script doing [exec
/some/bash/script], which was executing fine, but bash gave an error
which TCL passed along causing my script to fail. The error was due to
bash attempting to read /root/.bashrc (and getting a permission denied).
Naturally, we are r
Hiya
Daniel P. Stasinski wrote:
I'm curious about what stack sizes people are using for their 4.0.x /
4.5 installations.
I had a fun couple of days with this just before your post. AOLserver
was crashing... some playing with gdb and I eventually realised what was
going on and found the confi
Dnia 07-10-2005 o 09:42:00 Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
napisał:
Op Thu, 6 Oct 2005, schreef Dossy Shiobara:
I'd like to hear what people think now that the wiki is running
MediaWiki. Will this encourage you to use it more? Less?
You should convince the Wikipedia-developers to port
Op Thu, 6 Oct 2005, schreef Dossy Shiobara:
> I'd like to hear what people think now that the wiki is running
> MediaWiki. Will this encourage you to use it more? Less?
You should convince the Wikipedia-developers to port it to AOLServer
native; the performance of AOLServer would be a big help
27 matches
Mail list logo
