Yea, we are using nsxml in a production environment here, but feel
free to close the tickets and declare it obsolete anyway. We've
pretty much been running under that assumption for the last
year or so anyway.
Someday when I get more time I'll move over to tDom, but for right
now everything is
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 11:28, Matthew Krenzer wrote:
Yea, we are using nsxml in a production environment here,
Same here. It's used on half a dozen servers here. Perhaps some day
I'll migrate it to tDom but I'm in no hurry.
Daniel
--
|
On 2004.07.02, Greg Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We use nsxml in our production code at BNA. [...] We don't care if you
want to declare nsxml dead.
On 2004.07.06, Matthew Krenzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea, we are using nsxml in a production environment here, but feel
free to close the
dropping support for nsxml?
Yea, we are using nsxml in a production environment here, but feel free to
close the tickets and declare it obsolete anyway. We've pretty much been
running under that assumption for the last year or so anyway.
Someday when I get more time I'll move over to tDom
On 2004.07.06, Elliott Phil Civ AFMSA/SGSID [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What kind of application does one use tDom on? What is its strengths
weeknesses? -phil
tDOM provides APIs to Tcl for XML DOM parsing using the Expat parser
underneath. See:
http://www.tdom.org/
nsxml, I believe, uses
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 03:24:37PM -0400, Dossy wrote:
In Longer-term plans, I'd like to standardize around one or the other
(i.e., nsxml vs. tDOM) and as tDOM is also used by the stand-alone Tcl
audience, I'm hoping it will receive more support and thorough testing.
Choosing tDOM as the
On 2004.07.06, Andrew Piskorski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I think the debate on ns_xml vs. tDOM, which should we
standardize on? was over a long time ago. tDOM won unanimously. Has
anything important changed since then? It seems unlikely.
The debate for the OpenACS audience was over a
There are currently 3 open bugs in SourceForge for nsxml: #749796,
#749789 and #749774. However, as far as I know, nsxml has been
deprecated in favor of using tDOM with AOLserver.
Is anyone still using nsxml or do you know of anyone who is still using
it? Especially in a production environment?
On Friday 02 July 2004 10:12 am, Dossy wrote:
There are currently 3 open bugs in SourceForge for nsxml: #749796,
#749789 and #749774. However, as far as I know, nsxml has been
deprecated in favor of using tDOM with AOLserver.
The OpenACS project no longer uses nsxml, just tDOM, for our
