On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Bas Scheffers b...@scheffers.net wrote:
On Saturday, October 31, 2009 10:30pm, Dave Bauer
d...@thedesignexperience.org said:
Of course you can say apt-get install aolserver4 already.
Of course you can, but then what? Then you still have this completely alien
I like this approach, doesn't need to be perfect performance (PHP
isn't generally) but more naturally blending the AOLserver API's and
Tcl stuff into Apache seems smart in the year 2009.
Question: Does anyone (really) care about Win32 now? Poking at the
code today, I'm thinking
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 04:32:41PM -0500, Jim Davidson wrote:
Question: Does anyone (really) care about Win32 now?
The cross-platformness of Tcl and AOLserver have definitely been
useful to me in the past. In fact I'm still running AOLserver on
Windows today, but essentially as the platform
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Bas Scheffers b...@scheffers.net wrote:
I do this for a couple of sites, Apache's mod_proxy forwards stuff to
AOLserver. This is mostly where we have a scarcity of IPs.
But that still means you have to jump through hoops to install it, learn how
to run it in
On Saturday, October 31, 2009 10:30pm, Dave Bauer
d...@thedesignexperience.org said:
Of course you can say apt-get install aolserver4 already.
Of course you can, but then what? Then you still have this completely alien
server in front of you that you will need to configure. It puts people off.
I do this for a couple of sites, Apache's mod_proxy forwards stuff to
AOLserver. This is mostly where we have a scarcity of IPs.
But that still means you have to jump through hoops to install it,
learn how to run it in production, etc.
I'd love a being able to just say apt-get install
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Bas Scheffers b...@scheffers.net wrote:
I do this for a couple of sites, Apache's mod_proxy forwards stuff to
AOLserver. This is mostly where we have a scarcity of IPs.
But that still means you have to jump through hoops to install it, learn how
to run it in
With fancy switches and/or proxies like varnish can you effectively
blend aolserver with other app servers (lamp, ruby etc) now without
actual code changes ? I'm wondering if folks have done that
successfully
Jim
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 27, 2009, at 6:55 PM, Dossy Shiobara
This why all of the Apache supported languages either require the pre-fork
model where they keep one interpreter per process (like PHP) or party like
it's 1993 in a FastCGI environment like Ruby (on Rails) does. Yuk.
Don't name the FastCGI-party-people, they are mean!
Albeit there
On Tuesday, October 27, 2009 7:55pm, Bernd Eidenschink eidensch...@web.de
said:
Even using and relying on several AOL- and Naviservers for years now I cannot
get used to the technical superiority discussions...
It is not about technical superiority. No matter how hard you try, AOLserver
will
On 10/27/09 5:40 PM, Bas Scheffers wrote:
Moving AOLserver to run inside Apache as a module would be a great step to
making it more accesible and popular.
This is the reason why I'd like to implement a module for AOLserver that
would enable it to run as a FastCGI application under Apache
nitin chandra wrote:
Thank you Everyone,
After a lot of attempts i was successful in installing the AoLserver
but not PyWX or for that matter any thing which will integrate with
Python.
Support regarding PyWX on AoL is non-existent, and key people have
stopped working / supporting this combo
On Tuesday, October 27, 2009 9:08am, Jeff Rogers dv...@diphi.com said:
The C-python implementation has a misfeature known as the global
interpreter lock (GIL) that presents scalability problems in a threaded
This why all of the Apache supported languages either require the pre-fork
model where
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 03:38:30PM -0700, Jeff Rogers wrote:
The C-python implementation has a misfeature known as the global
interpreter lock (GIL) that presents scalability problems in a threaded
Right.
AOLserver is bound to tcl at a pretty deep level, and it does so very
well. While
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:04 PM, nitin chandra nitinchand...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Is it necessary to install OpenACS along with AoLserver?
No. OpenACS is just one application built on the AOLserver platform.
Dave
Nitin
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove
You have to install AOLserver if you want to run OpenACS, but
AOLserver is independent of OpenACS.
But you might join the OpenACS community, and/or use their resources
(openacs.org), they discuss a wider range of things than we do here.
tom jackson
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:04 AM, nitin
Thank you Tom,
But somehow i am still waiting for support / guidance for installation
of my AoLserver
In that regard I have already requested the list twice still
no response.
Sub : AoLserver 4.5.1 install issue
Still waiting ...
Hope someone will :)
Nitin
On Fri, Oct 16,
Absolutely not! Only if you want to use OpenACS functionality. Our site
started by using ACS (OpenACS's predecessor) as a foundation and a
jumping-off point to learn from - we picked only the parts we needed from
ACS, primarily infrastructure management (security, user registrations,
shared
On Oct 15, 2009, at 10:04 AM, nitin chandra wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Is it necessary to install OpenACS along with AoLserver?
No, OpenACS is just a web toolkit that uses AOLserver, just as Django
uses Apache.
Don Baccus
http://donb.photo.net
http://birdnotes.net
http://openacs.org
--
19 matches
Mail list logo
