Hello Fran i'll love to work on this project 1.19 Python API/library for
Apertium. how can i begin contributing to the project?
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 5:13 PM Francis Tyers wrote:
> Here is my run-down on the current GSOC ideas page:
>
> 1.1 Anaphora resolution for machine translation
>
El 2019-03-04 14:49, Yu-Jung Ko escribió:
Hi,
For 1.11, may I ask the reason why the existing code was not merged?
Yu-Jung
The student who was working on it didn't get around to it.
Fran
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Hi,
For 1.11, may I ask the reason why the existing code was not merged?
Yu-Jung
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:22 AM ashwath s via Apertium-stuff <
apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> hi im interested in 1.12 ud and apertium integration. How do i get started
> ?
>
> On Fri, 15 Feb, 2019,
hi im interested in 1.12 ud and apertium integration. How do i get started ?
On Fri, 15 Feb, 2019, 17:34 Priyank Modi, wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I am really interested in working on 1.2(for hin-pan(Hindi-Punjabi)) if
> it's open. Could you please connect me to the POC for the language pair. If
>
Hi everyone,
I am really interested in working on 1.2(for hin-pan(Hindi-Punjabi)) if
it's open. Could you please connect me to the POC for the language pair. If
that's not available, could I work on 1.15? I want to get started right
away, I have already gone through the wiki pages for both and
Hello,
You can find more explanation about what should you do in this project here
http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Ideas_for_Google_Summer_of_Code#Extend_weighted_transfer_rules
Sevilay
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:28 PM Shivanshu Sharma <
sharma.shivansh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, I would love
Hello, I would love to work on 1.7 to implement weighted transfer rules on
a new language pair, hopefully, Hindi-Sanskrit pair. Could someone guide me
on how to get started?
- Shivanshu
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:43 PM Francis Tyers wrote:
> Here is my run-down on the current GSOC ideas page:
Awesome, thanks!
On Thu, 31 Jan, 2019, 10:09 Francis Tyers El 2019-01-31 04:19, ashwath s escribió:
> > Are those enough to prepare me ? And i dont have to do anything else
> > right now ?
> >
> > On Thu, 31 Jan, 2019, 06:37 Francis Tyers >
> >> El 2019-01-30 11:44, ashwath s via Apertium-stuff
El 2019-01-31 04:19, ashwath s escribió:
Are those enough to prepare me ? And i dont have to do anything else
right now ?
On Thu, 31 Jan, 2019, 06:37 Francis Tyers
El 2019-01-30 11:44, ashwath s via Apertium-stuff escribió:
hey i would like to contribute into the "Robust tokenisation in
Are those enough to prepare me ? And i dont have to do anything else right
now ?
On Thu, 31 Jan, 2019, 06:37 Francis Tyers El 2019-01-30 11:44, ashwath s via Apertium-stuff escribió:
> > hey i would like to contribute into the "Robust tokenisation in
> > Lttoolbox" project or the "Unsupervised
El 2019-01-30 11:44, ashwath s via Apertium-stuff escribió:
hey i would like to contribute into the "Robust tokenisation in
Lttoolbox" project or the "Unsupervised weighing of automata" . Please
tell me the pre-requirements i should be knowing and what i should do
now to work on those projects
El dc., 30 gen. 2019, 12.35, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer va
escriure:
> Hèctor Alòs i Font
> čálii:
>
> > Thanks, Kevin, but that's really a short description. Is there any
> > explanation in the wiki or elsewhere?
> > Hèctor
>
> What do you want to know about it?
>
> I put my short explanation +
hey i would like to contribute into the "Robust tokenisation in Lttoolbox"
project or the "Unsupervised weighing of automata" . Please tell me the
pre-requirements i should be knowing and what i should do now to work on
those projects
On Wed, 30 Jan, 2019, 15:05 Kevin Brubeck Unhammer Hèctor
Hèctor Alòs i Font
čálii:
> Thanks, Kevin, but that's really a short description. Is there any
> explanation in the wiki or elsewhere?
> Hèctor
What do you want to know about it?
I put my short explanation + the ideas for what you can do with it from
"Work to be done" at
Thanks, Kevin, but that's really a short description. Is there any
explanation in the wiki or elsewhere?
Hèctor
El dc., 30 gen. 2019, 11.25, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer va
escriure:
> Hèctor Alòs i Font
> čálii:
>
> > where can we read
> > anything about weight in lttoolbox?
>
> Put the w attribute
Hèctor Alòs i Font
čálii:
> where can we read
> anything about weight in lttoolbox?
Put the w attribute on an like
and use
lt-proc -L1
to output only the 1 best weight classes.
I believe unmarked is the same as , and lower is better.
Use lt-proc -W to show the weights (see lt-proc
El 2019-01-29 15:02, Monday sandy escribió:
Hello Francis, can I also submit my own ideas ?
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019, 18:30 Francis Tyers wrote:
El 2019-01-28 17:20, Monday sandy escribió:
Hello I'll love to work on 1.19, how can I contribute?
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019, 18:13 Francis Tyers
wrote:
Hello Francis, can I also submit my own ideas ?
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019, 18:30 Francis Tyers wrote:
> El 2019-01-28 17:20, Monday sandy escribió:
> > Hello I'll love to work on 1.19, how can I contribute?
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019, 18:13 Francis Tyers wrote:
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> >>
> >> 1.19
Hi Hèctor,
I am looking forward to help you with weighted transfer. Also I want your
help for take a look on result of ang-spa pair that I had apply on
apertium-ambiguous, of course if you like))
best wishes,
Sevilay
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:24 AM Francis Tyers wrote:
> El 2019-01-28
El 2019-01-28 19:31, Hèctor Alòs i Font escribió:
Missatge de Francis Tyers del dia dl., 28 de
gen. 2019 a les 21:13:
There is a lot of functionality that is not used widely that could
be
really
used to improve performance of language pairs.
* apertium-separable
* weights in lttoolbox
This
Missatge de Francis Tyers del dia dl., 28 de gen.
2019 a les 21:13:
>
> There is a lot of functionality that is not used widely that could be
> really
> used to improve performance of language pairs.
>
> * apertium-separable
> * weights in lttoolbox
> * weighted transfer
>
I'd like to try them.
FWIW, I would not call 1.19 mostly done. Only the proof of concept is
~working. Neither the
installation part or the actual value-add (directly accessing functions via
C++ binding) is
complete. The latter is not even started as far as I recall.
Please take a look at the issues though as Fran
El 2019-01-28 17:26, shashank tiwari escribió:
Hello, i'll love to work on 1.6 any recommendation on how to get
started on it ??
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019, 22:43 Francis Tyers
[snip]
1.6 Robust recursive transfer
Keep, this would be really great. I got asked to run a workshop on
Apertium
El 2019-01-28 17:20, Monday sandy escribió:
Hello I'll love to work on 1.19, how can I contribute?
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019, 18:13 Francis Tyers wrote:
[snip]
1.19 Python API/library for Apertium
This was mostly done right? I think this is still a really important
project
First try to
Hello, i'll love to work on 1.6 any recommendation on how to get started on
it ??
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019, 22:43 Francis Tyers Here is my run-down on the current GSOC ideas page:
>
> 1.1 Anaphora resolution for machine translation
>
> Nice project idea, but not sure in 3 months.
>
> 1.2
Hello I'll love to work on 1.19, how can I contribute?
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019, 18:13 Francis Tyers wrote:
> Here is my run-down on the current GSOC ideas page:
>
> 1.1 Anaphora resolution for machine translation
>
> Nice project idea, but not sure in 3 months.
>
> 1.2 Bring a released
Here is my run-down on the current GSOC ideas page:
1.1 Anaphora resolution for machine translation
Nice project idea, but not sure in 3 months.
1.2 Bring a released language pair up to state-of-the-art quality
Always needed
1.3 Robust tokenisation in lttoolbox
Up for grabs, we
27 matches
Mail list logo
