On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 03:02:30PM +0200, Francis Tyers wrote:
>
> As I said, I would be welcome to receive PRs if you think this needs
> clarifying.
So I created:
https://github.com/apertium/apertium-eng/pull/1
Kurt
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> It seems none of the language data files claim any copyright or
> say under which license they are.
Well, some of them do, just check apertium-fin for example.
> There just seems to be a COPYING
> file in the same directory, which is useless without claiming the
>
El 2018-08-05 13:30, Kurt Roeckx escribió:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 12:13:50PM +0200, Francis Tyers wrote:
El 2018-08-05 10:16, Kurt Roeckx escribió:
> Looking at https://github.com/apertium/apertium-cym, there is
> a list of authors and a copy of the license, but at no point does
> it say it's
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 12:13:50PM +0200, Francis Tyers wrote:
> El 2018-08-05 10:16, Kurt Roeckx escribió:
> > Looking at https://github.com/apertium/apertium-cym, there is
> > a list of authors and a copy of the license, but at no point does
> > it say it's copyrighted, or that it's under
El 2018-08-05 08:48, Kurt Roeckx escribió:
Hi,
It seems none of the language data files claim any copyright or
say under which license they are. There just seems to be a COPYING
file in the same directory, which is useless without claiming the
copyright and saying it's under that license.
El 2018-08-05 10:16, Kurt Roeckx escribió:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 08:36:19AM +0100, Kevin Donnelly wrote:
Hi Kurt
- Original Message -
From: "Kurt Roeckx"
Could you please clarify the license?
PS: It would be great that data like this was not under the GPL
but something more suited
Hi Kurt
- Original Message -
From: "Kurt Roeckx"
It's hard to find on the website, it just says GPL, but if you download
http://eurfa.org.uk/downloads/cylist2013.csv.tar.gz the README
does say "either version 3 of the License, or (at your option)
any later version." You should
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 08:36:19AM +0100, Kevin Donnelly wrote:
> Hi Kurt
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kurt Roeckx"
> Could you please clarify the license?
> PS: It would be great that data like this was not under the GPL
> but something more suited for ik like the CC-BY-SA.
> -
Hi Kurt
- Original Message -
From: "Kurt Roeckx"
Could you please clarify the license?
PS: It would be great that data like this was not under the GPL
but something more suited for ik like the CC-BY-SA.
-
I think the assumption is that since the overall license is GPL, that also
