On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 12:27:10PM +0200, Tino Didriksen wrote:
> https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-module_packages.html#s-package_names
>
> The package python3-apertium must provide the Python module apertium, but
> it provides apertium_core. I can fix this by either
Hi,
I am this week on hliday with low internet availability so only few
quick points. Firstly I strogly recommend joining #apertium IRC channel,
I think even non-mentors will have useful clues. For the tokenisation
problem I think the main resource is to understand various unicode
technical
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 12:55:55PM -0500, Daniel Swanson wrote:
> > Do you have plans on doing tests
> > on runtime efficiency, i.e. how fast it is to run the automata on texts?
> > One thing that we found with flag diacritics on lexc is is that it's
> > kindof possible to abuse them to optimise
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 03:10:40PM +0100, Tino Didriksen wrote:
> Apertium is in GSoC 2020!
>
> Time to update the
> http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Ideas_for_Google_Summer_of_Code page.
>
> What projects were actually completed to the mentors' satisfaction last
> year?
I think at least
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 04:50:45PM +0200, Tino Didriksen wrote:
> For khannatanmai's GSoC project, secondary tags will be implemented in a
> backwards compatible manner. That it in itself indisputable. But, there is
> a question of how the initial batch of secondary tags should look.
>
> I feel
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:34:22PM +0530, Ayush wrote:
> Dear sir/ma’am,
> This is to inform that I have successfully completed and submitted my
> solution to coding task as assigned under the robust tokenisation.
> Link for my solution to challenging task –
>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 04:46:06PM +0530, Ayush wrote:
> Dear sir,
> Actually I have quite reached nowhere while going through the lttoolbox. Can
> you please help me with making of schedule for the proposal and also what all
> thinks I would be working under for the task of robust tokenisation.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 03:18:44PM +0200, Zanga Chimombo wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I've had a bit of time to continue looking at this. I've copied over
> something from:
> https://github.com/apertium/apertium-lin/blob/master/apertium-lin.lin.twol
>
> %{K%}:k <=> :n :0 _ .#. ;
>
> But it's not
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 03:10:28PM +0530, Tanmai Khanna wrote:
> *Disadvantages:*
> 1. The monodix has some erroneous analyses - wrong surface forms, wrong
> analyses, or even MWEs that aren't really MWEs and can be translated word
> by word. These are currently removed since bidixes are more
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 07:44:25PM -0700, Samuel Sloniker wrote:
> I've also thought about the possibility of a forum?
Forums can be nice but I think have different function than mailing
list..
> Discourse looks nice.
>
Is this discourse.mozilla.org? I really dislike that, last I was forced
to
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 06:04:35PM +0100, Francis Tyers wrote:
> Sourcehut is a free/open-source "forge" type thing run by Drew DeVault. They
> have
> mailing lists.
> [...]
> What do people think?
Excellent idea. One suggestion I have is to make sure they get archived
as well as usable through
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 12:28:14PM +0300, Hèctor Alòs i Font wrote:
> A Sardinian collaborator commented to me: "Wouldn't it be possible that
> every time there are more possible translations these come out in a little
> window where the user chooses the right solution, as in spell checkers"?
>
Hi all,
I've written a handful of apertium-fin-* prototypes and I usually end up
spending way too much time with all the useless subclasses of proper
nouns we have (cogs, ants, als, tops, orgs, and to top all that,
sometimes ms and fs for some extra (mis)gendering). Could we just get
rid of those
I think I've come up with a solution that is minimally intrusive for
existing work-flows and usages, and that is, allowing optionalising
select tags for generation, i.e.:
Analysing:
echo London | lt-proc eng.automorf.bin
^London/London/London$
(I didn't even plan this it just happened to be
Am Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 07:22:36PM +0300 schrieb Hèctor Alòs i Font:
> Is there any form to match a "begin of sentence" in lexical selection or in
> transfer? In transfer, usually the point of the previous sentence is used,
> but I want to match even the beginning of the first sentence of the
Thank you all for a lively discussion, I'll summarise here and reply to
few of the comments in a typical inline reply format. I think as tldr we
agree to some extent that these rich np annotation tags are specific to
language pairs and steps in the pipeline and should not be hindering
unrelated
[for some reason these all went to gmail spam...]
Am Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 08:54:05AM -0500 schrieb Daniel Swanson:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 8:47 AM Flammie A Pirinen wrote:
> >
> > perhaps this is different version of pyhthon or libraries? I have
> > python 3.9.1 on linu
Am Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 08:03:41AM -0500 schrieb Daniel Swanson:
> >
> > Another question is that in lot of expected files there seems to be
> > all-capsed words for fin-* pairs, I am not sure how this has happened?
> > I am guessing my apertium is older and some ICU changes have affected
> > the
Am Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 08:14:01PM -0500 schrieb Daniel Swanson:
> At the beginning of last week, 47 languages and pairs had a meaningful
> 'make test', and several of those were failing. As of today, 365 repos
> have 'make test' and virtually all are passing.
That's exciting, here's some first
Am Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 03:35:45PM -0500 schrieb Daniel Swanson:
> This script could, without too much trouble, be expanded to cover the
> rest of our source files, at which point I would like to propose that
> we move towards greater standardization of our tagset:
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
