Re: [apple-crop] Tree Row Volume and newer pesticide chemistries?

2012-10-27 Thread Jon Clements
Peter, you might want to look at this: http://newenglandvfc.org/pdf_proceedings/2009/ABCofTRV.pdf And in direct answer to your age old question, it's both the amount of water and the amount of pesticide that change (per acre) if using TRV. (Assuming using TRV is appropriate and indicated.) :-)

Re: [apple-crop] Tree Row Volume and newer pesticide chemistries?

2012-10-27 Thread maurice tougas
That said, we've always been told "the label is the law", and when you apply materials below labeled rate, you are on your own in terms of efficacy. Assume that manufacturer will assume no responsibility for damage if rate applied is below minimum stated on label. I'm confident that we are close

Re: [apple-crop] Tree Row Volume and newer pesticide chemistries?

2012-10-26 Thread Arthur Kelly
My understanding is it is both. X ounces of pesticide per 100 gal of water and then TRV calculation and # of gals per acre. Art Kelly Kelly Orchards Acton, ME On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Peter Werts wrote: > Hi All, > > ** ** > > Has anyone come across Extension articles or peer rev

Re: [apple-crop] Tree Row Volume and newer pesticide chemistries?

2012-10-26 Thread dmnorton
Don't know if this is what you are looking for Peter, but I have an article I got from a Cornell Cooperative Extension Publication at http://ipmguidelines.org/TreeFruits/Chapters/CH04/default-6.aspx which states: 1. It is the amount of water that changes, not the amount of pesticide per

Re: Apple-Crop: Tree Row volume

2010-10-07 Thread Arthur Kelly
gt; totally clear but close to Art expression “reverse tree row volume” > > Best regards > > Jean Marc Jourdain > > Ctifl > > > > *De :* apple-crop@virtualorchard.net [mailto:apple-c...@virtualorchard.net] > *De la part de* Con.Traas > *Envoyé :* jeudi 7 octobre

Re: Apple-Crop: Tree Row volume

2010-10-07 Thread Arthur Kelly
You're probably correct Con. What do you think about coverage and penetration? Reaching in, say 7-8 ft and up, maybe 14 ft as opposed to 3-4 ft in and 8-10 ft up. This goes to canopy density and the equalizer is the denser canopy of the dwarf planting. What spacings are common on your farm? Ou

RE: Apple-Crop: Tree Row volume

2010-10-07 Thread Jourdain Jean-Marc
[mailto:apple-c...@virtualorchard.net] De la part de Con.Traas Envoyé : jeudi 7 octobre 2010 13:02 À : Apple-Crop Objet : RE: Apple-Crop: Tree Row volume Hello Art, I would contend that a well-planned properly filled out orchard of dwarf trees (say from seventh year) has just as many leaves as the majority of

RE: Apple-Crop: Tree Row volume

2010-10-07 Thread Con.Traas
Hello Art, I would contend that a well-planned properly filled out orchard of dwarf trees (say from seventh year) has just as many leaves as the majority of orchards with standards. If this were not the case the dwarf orchard would not be able to out-yield the standard orchard in tons of crop per