Randy Kobes wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Steve Hay wrote:
The attached patch, or something similar, is required to build the
current svn version of libapreq2 on Win32.
PerlLIO_link() is mapped to link(), which the Win32 CRT doesn't have. I
will look at changing PerlLIO_link() to map
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Note this is our first non-dev candidate, so please give it the
extra scrutiny it deserves. Release Candidate #1 -
http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.07-rc1.tar.gz
This still doesn't build on Win32 with my perl configuration, in which
PERL_IMPLICIT_SYS is not
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Note this is our second non-dev candidate, so please give it the
extra scrutiny it deserves. Release Candidate #2 -
http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.07-rc2.tar.gz
All tests OK for me: WinXP/VC6, perl-5.8.7 (without PERL_IMPLICIT_SYS!),
apache-2.0.54,
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Ok, please test rc3 instead:
http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.07-rc3.tar.gz
All tests OK here (WinXP/VC6, perl-5.8.7, apache-2.0.54, mp-2.0.2-rc2).
Apache2::* installed OK too.
Radan Computational Ltd.
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Please download, test, and VOTE on the following
candidate tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.08-RC3.tar.gz
[ .. ]
I'd like to make the actual release around Wednesday of next week
(07/12/2006)
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Steve Hay wrote:
Sorry, but I'm still seeing quite a few failures. I started with a
completely fresh build (with your patch applied) and the top-level
nmake test failed a bunch of upload.t tests first time. (So it's
not just running the test multiple
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Steve Hay wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
Also, just to verify that it is the stray temp files
left over that are causing the problem, does it help
if you change the APR_EXCL flag in the call to apr_file_mktemp on
about line 832 of library/util.c
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Please download, test, and report back on the following
candidate tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.09-rc1.tar.gz
All tests OK on Win32 (on a single run, at least--I'm not sure if the
previous problems with upload.t have gone away or
All OK on Win32 using apache-2.2.2, perl-5.8.8 and mod_perl-2.0.3-RC2
--
Radan Computational Ltd.
The information contained in this message and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have
Patrick Galbraith wrote:
Hi all,
I used to know the trick, I think, but can't remember. I want to code my
application to be smart about whether it's on a system that can use
mod_perl2/apreq, or if I have to use CGI. I 've code my app to use CGI
successfully, but would like to keep the code
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Randy, do you know why we use the APR_FILE_NOCLEANUP flag? Maybe
we should just remove that and see if it fixes the problem Vinay
is seeing.
Hi Steve, and all,
If you remember from
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Please give the tarball at
http://people.apache.org/~issac/libapreq-1.34-RC1.tar.gz
a try and report comments/problems/etc. to the apreq-dev list
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All tests OK on WinXP (VC6) with perl-5.8.8, apache-1.3.34 and
mod_perl-1.29.
--
Issac Goldstand wrote:
The apreq developers are planning a maintenance release of
libapreq1. This version primarily addresses an issue noted
with FireFox 2.0 truncating file uploads in SSL mode.
Please give the tarball at
http://people.apache.org/~issac/libapreq-1.34-RC2.tar.gz
a try and
Bojan Smojver wrote:
It has been over two years since the latest apreq2 release, so it is
time to get some new code out the door. Numerous bugs were fixed (see
the full list in the CHANGES file) since the last official release
(2.08), so please give us feedback on this release candidate.
I didn't vote because AFAIK I don't actually have a vote. I have commit
access, but I'm not a PMC member and therefore have no vote. Is that
correct?
-Original Message-
From: Issac Goldstand [mailto:mar...@beamartyr.net]
Sent: 07 January 2009 13:24
Cc: APREQ List
Subject: Re: [RELEASE
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s.
We're still a +1 short of release.
Has anyone else tested on Win32 yet?
I reported a build error which hasn't been addressed yet:
http://marc.info/?l=apreq-devm=123244555902865w=2
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Please test and vote on
http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.12-RC2.tar.gz
http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.12-RC2.tar.gz.asc
These should have the .deps directories removed, but
otherwise the source is unchanged. Fred, try running
make install before
I don't know about the event MPM one, I'm afraid - that isn't used on Windows.
On 24 June 2014 08:53, Issac Goldstand mar...@beamartyr.net wrote:
Awesome!
Are the other anomalies that Mark reported yesterday also
Apache::Test-land?
Issac
On 24/06/2014 10:48, Steve Hay wrote:
I just
[Resending from an address that's actually subscribed to the lists...]
The current mod_perl release (2.0.10) is taken from trunk. (The
httpd24 branch was only for development work leading towards the
previous release (2.0.9), and is now obsolete.)
On 17 November 2016 at 09:03, Issac Goldstand
On 5 December 2016 at 16:14, Issac Goldstand wrote:
> Builds and passes all tests on linux x64 with:
>
> Perl/5.18 Apache/2.2.31 mod_perl/2.10
> Perl/5.24 Apache/2.4.23 mod_perl/2.10
>
> I'm +1 on release
All successful on Win32 (x64) / VC10 with:
perl-5.25
20 matches
Mail list logo