On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> 3) Our certificate is from CACert. AFAIK, this is not included in many
> browsers by default. If you use Arch Linux, at least everything that
> uses the OpenSSL certificate store and all Mozilla browsers are
> CACert-enabled - on other opera
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Yes, except that does not work using makechrootpkg
>
> It used to... I think... maybe... or maybe that was just in my head.
> It could be dealt with, though
>
I'm sure it used to work - t
> As I can see now, these are .pyo files. Are they generate at runtime or
> something like that? They are not in the package.
>
.pyo files are, I believe, "optimized" python files generated during runtime.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Because I haven't gotten to it sooner: Eric, you're awesome for doing
> this. I send you many eHugs
>
> On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Eric Bélanger
> wrote:
>> Just bumping to get more input. And doing an update/summary at the same
>>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> I specifically told you guys that we were NOT dropping the i686 port,
> and you guys went and voted on it without me? This is the last straw.
> If you guys don't fix this now, consider this my last email.
>
I told them. I told them you'd be
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Eduardo Romero wrote:
> I hereby grant the community the privilege to upload this drivers to
> AUR/Community and take good care of them. Once they are uploaded on
> AUR/Community I will proceed to delete them from extra and make a front
> page news announcement.
>
>
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Updated my mailman subscription...can anybody hear me?
>
Nope. Clearly your tubes are broken.
(on another note, I just realized that my email for the lists was
still [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I've been using [EMAIL PROTEC
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Dusty Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/8/1 Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> What follows below is a recounting of the Great Gerolde Breakage of
>> '08. Details are provided by eyewitness accounts, and names have been
>> changed to protect the innocent.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there a certain reason why pacman.static has been removed? I used it
>> a lot when playing with glibc upgrades t
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a certain reason why pacman.static has been removed? I used it
> a lot when playing with glibc upgrades that often break the dynamic
> pacman. Is there any replacement?
It also ended up being pretty useful when p
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas Radke schrieb:
>>>
>>> We needed that patch with catalyst on 2.6.25 (x86_64 only), I thought
>>> they removed the dependence on that symbol. I could re-add the above
>>> patch.
>>>
>>
>> Just uploading catalyst 8.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Bächler schrieb:
>>
>> So this is it, 2.6.26 is going to testing. I adjusted the configuration
>> according to http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10512 and changed the maximum
>> number of CPUs to 16. I hope I didn't mi
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>> I'
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
> I'm updating and fixing some things on IRC today, so I'm looking for a
> list of IRC usernames for those of you who need new cloaks.
> New developers, new TUs, things like that.
>
> Also, (sadly) I will be remov
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Dusty Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3) Arch64 is not separate from Arch Linux, it should share these
> original ideals. They're two architectures under one distro, they
> shouldn't have different philosophies.
I think the issue here is that Arch64 started as
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Ronald van Haren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi devs/Tus,
>
> I'll be on vacation from 9th of August (tomorrow) until 29th of
> August. During this time I will probably not check my mail at regular
> intervals so don't expect quick respones from my side ;)
9th of
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Travis Willard wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Travis Willard wrote:
>>>
>>>>
&g
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Travis Willard wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I was talking about JUST the command-line functionality. That
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Travis Willard wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Allan McRae <
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Travis Willard wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 5:33 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Travis Willard wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 5:33 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> So looking at abs I
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 5:33 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So looking at abs I noticed it at some stage had the ability to sync single
> repos:
>
>> abs --help
> Arch Build System 2.1 -- synchronization utility
> usage: /usr/bin/abs [options] [repository1 [repository2 ...]
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Eduardo Romero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 23:36 -0400, Dale Blount wrote:
>> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 21:28 -0400, Eduardo Romero wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 20:40 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> > > Now we have a maintainer for wine again
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey guys.
>>
>> I've been giving it some thought lately, and I think I need to sit
>> back and assess
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hey guys.
>>>
>&
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey guys.
>>
>> I've been giving it some thought lately, and I think I need to sit
>> back and assess
Hey guys.
I've been giving it some thought lately, and I think I need to sit
back and assess my priorities in life.
My day-job has been taking up a lot of my time lately, and events in
my personal life have also increased of late. That leaves little
"free time" and I'm finding more and more late
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>> If you
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
> If you all remember, after the last archweb release, we had to offload
> the todolists (package IDs no longer matched, and it was all complex
> to convert, so we deferred it).
>
> Well, I'm going to re-add the o
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I pushed this because people gripe about these things and it irritates me.
>
> http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=84f76aafc5f6d7f3d2c2141d2930e42dcb82def0
>
> Additionally, it seems silly to ch
Just a quick note that I won't be around this weekend - be doing some
travelling to visit my family. Be back Monday!
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Eric Belanger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Jan de Groot wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 17:55 -0400, Eric Belanger wrote:
Hi all,
My gpm package is out-of-date and the new ve
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 3:32 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Warning: Ensure your ABS tree is clean to prevent false positives.
Point of note - since these scripts depend directly on the ABS tree on
Gerolde, I think it should be run ONLY after an ABS resync - a lot of
the "missing repo packages"
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 8:35 AM, VIAGRA (R) Official Site
> wrote:
>> About this mailing:
>> You are receiving this e-mail because you subscribed to MSN Featured Offers.
>> Microsoft respects your privacy. If you do not
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 12:21 AM, James Rayner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As mentioned before, I'm outta here for two weeks - be back Monday the
>> 23rd. I didn't get the package-u
As mentioned before, I'm outta here for two weeks - be back Monday the
23rd. I didn't get the package-updating blitz I planned done -
pre-vacation planning was too busy. :(
Take care guys. Don't burn down the house while I'm gone.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Am Dienstag 03 Juni 2008 00:43:53 schrieb Thayer Williams:
>>> Is this possible?
>>
>> I think so. Just build a new icon-set like crystalsvg-arch
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Roman Kyrylych
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Erm, it's a bit of a hack, so make sure if you DO add it to the wiki,
> you slather it in warnings like "OMG please be sure you know what
> you're doing".
Yeah, it's a total hack, this really shouldn't be documented anywhe
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Does anyone mind if I u
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone mind if I update the kde-common i686 package to remove the
> artwork stuff? I see Tobias is the maintainer, but he's currently
> away right?
I say go for it.
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have a machine that has been put aside for building 64 bit packages.
>> Now that Aaron's is dead, we could start using this one. I have no
>> idea
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Eric Belanger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 May 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 25 May 2008, Travis Willard wrote:
>>
>>> Can't connect to phrak's x86_64 build machine (connection times out)
>>
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> The kdm rc.d scripts cou
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The kdm rc.d scripts could be removed, too. One should start kdm via inittab.
I think the rc.d method is too widely used to just drop it like that.
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I saw this bug today: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10526
>
> I do not use samba, but could update it and pray if no one else
> actually uses it.
I make very minor and sporadic use of it - for the mostpart, I'd be
doing t
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> stonecrest wrote a very useful script in my opinion a while ago :
>> http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch/2007-November/016238.html
>>
>>
Can't connect to phrak's x86_64 build machine (connection times out)
If someone could build x86_64 catalyst and catalyst-utils (new
PKGBUILDs in trunk/) I'd appreciate it. thanks.
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 21:09 +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Donners
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Am Samstag, 17. Mai 2008 12:33:35 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
>>> I think it is time to release this
>>
>> signed-off for both arches
>>
>>
>
> I'll
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Am Montag, 19. Mai 2008 18:07:51 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
>>> Please sign off on all you can.
>>
>> kernel and mkinitcpio are fine for both arches
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Eric Belanger
>>> <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Tobias Kieslich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 May 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Move complete, all DB files replaces w
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Tobias Kieslich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
>>
>> Move complete, all DB files replaces with repo-add generated DBs (yes!)
>>
>> New scripts are in /arch/. Please let me know if there is any error or
>> anything like that
I too will be taking a vacation, mine being a trip to Israel.
However mine starts June 7th, and will last until June 21st, so you
still have to put up with me for a bit.
I just figured I'd get in on the party while everyone else was announcing.
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> im mostly offline the next 2 weeks, marriage and honeymoon :)
Congrats Tobias! :)
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=365843#p365843
Does something on the ISO need to be updated since ABS moved to extra?
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hey guys,
> >> I'm looking for someone who wants to help out as
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:42 AM, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have lots of bug reports for missing desktop files.
> Is this something 'we' are doing, or is it something that we should be
> telling users to report upstream instead?
>
> Seems like it should be an upstream issue to me, eve
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am adding these packages to extra today:
>
> archlinux-artwork
> Our new logos, icons and related items in SVG format.
>
> archlinux-wallpaper
> A multipack of arch-branded wallpapers.
>
> This is the first installm
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 20
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> an old outstanding update someone found and flagged. other
> distros(Debian, Gentoo, Frugal) also use 2.5.9 as their last stable
> release.
>
> -Andy
>
> Changes in versions 2.5.8 and 2.5.9: bug fixes only.
>
> Changes
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Eric Belanger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 5 May 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
>
> > On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Eric Belanger
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > In testing for both arches.
> > >
> > > Minor upstream update:
> > >
> >
> > S
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 08:13 -0400, Travis Willard wrote:
> >
> > > Re: your libtool fixes, did you
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 08:13 -0400, Travis Willard wrote:
>
> > Re: your libtool fixes, did you build against the testing libtool? Is
> > that even necessary?
>
> I used the testing libto
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Eric Belanger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a) have adopted all or some of their "assigned" orphans and have modified
> the list accordingly
I scanned through the list
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Michal Soltys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Travis Willard wrote:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I just realized that, for some squirrely reason, I am currently
> > "maintaining" libcap. I have no freakin' clue what
Hey guys,
I just realized that, for some squirrely reason, I am currently
"maintaining" libcap. I have no freakin' clue what libcap even is. I
just got a flag-out-of-date version asking if we should update it to
libcap2, which seems reasonable, as it's nice and shiny-new. Looking
around, howeve
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right around when we switched to SVN, I switched to gmail. Because I
> was used to my old email client noticing the recipient and changing
> the From field by default, I didn't even think of having to change it
> in gmail.
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 07:20 -0400, Travis Willard wrote:
> > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 15:44
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 15:44 -0400, Travis Willard wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > Recent exploit found in libpng < 1.2.27
> > (http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10192#comment27550) is
Hey guys,
Recent exploit found in libpng < 1.2.27
(http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10192#comment27550) is getting a lot
of attention in our forums and bugtrackers, however since the APNG
patch (included for firefox3's sake -
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9570) isn't updated for the new libpng
vers
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Eric Belanger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> gpm 1.20.3-1 in Core
>
>
> Upon updating to gpm 1.20.3-1, you will most likely get the following error
> message:
"When attempting to update to" maybe?
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> >
> >
> > > On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 12:05 -0500, Aaron Griffi
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm really really sick of people making mountains out of the docs
> molehill... it's such a petty issue...
>
> Would anyone honestly care if we removed the !docs option from
> makepkg.conf by default, and let each mainta
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Simo Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 06:09:08PM +0200, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_B=E4chler_
> wrote:
> > - aufs (Simo, could you have a look, you must probably update it)
> I'll fix this very soon. It just needs a hug. I'm going to update t
Hey,
Can I get someone with super-powers on gerolde to update abs to 2.1-1,
and add the following line to /etc/cron.daily/update-abs.sh after the
existing /usr/bin/svn2abs line?
/usr/bin/community2abs /home/abs/rsync /home/cvs-community
This will ensure people can also get community through ABS
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a note for you all. If you want svn to modify the $Id$ tags the
> way SVN does, you need to enable it for the PKGBUILD.
>
> This is done like so:
>
>svn propset svn:keywords Id
>
> The available keywords for re
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:16 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:16 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Simo Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:35:34PM -0700, eliott wrote:
> > > > Fine with it, as long as you move csup out too (extra for now, maybe
> > > >
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So... are we going to ann
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So... are we going to announce the SVN move, or should I just go on
> > ahead and announce the ABS stuff?
>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So... are we going to announce the SVN move, or should I just go on
> ahead and announce the ABS stuff?
>
Oh, and revised draft:
---8<-8<
ABS 2.0 In Testing
Wi
With ABS changing from cvsup to rsync, we either need to move rsync to
core, or abs to extra.
I vote rsync to core.
Anyone opposed? If all are OK with it, I'll move it to core tomorrow.
So... are we going to announce the SVN move, or should I just go on
ahead and announce the ABS stuff?
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:15 AM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Montag, 14. April 2008 08:47:52 schrieb eliott:
>
> > > it does not work for me on x86_64:
> > >
> > > ==> Starting ABS sync...
> > > rsync: getaddrinfo: 873: Name or service not known
> > > rsync error: error i
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Samstag, 12. April 2008 17:16:41 schrieb Travis Willard:
>
> > Anyway, muck around, have fun, see if I missed anything.
>
> This might not be important now, but it would be nice to checkout m
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Date: Monday, April 14, 2008 @ 11:06:54
> > Author: travis
> > Path: /home/cvs
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 1:17 AM, Eric Belanger
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Another question: How do we add packages to the repo? I need to moved a
> > couple packages from unsupported to extra (new depends for g
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Aaron Griffin <[E
Same as 2.0-1, except:
rsync server configurable
rsyncd.conf.abs moved to /usr/share/abs
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Eric Belanger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK.
>
> I'm currently uploading all rebuilt packages to i686 testing except
> xine-lib which doesn't compile on i686 (asm error). The x86_64 packages will
> follow tonight or in the next few days.
Eric, you rule - I just
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 4:20 PM, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/12/08, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In testing for signoff. Moved to rsync. Yay!
>
> Should /etc/abs/rsyncd.conf.abs be in the packages etc directory?
>
> Seems lik
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> eliott schrieb:
>
>
> > upgrading from a csup abs config to the new rsync config involved:
> > 1. mv /etc/abs/abs.conf.pacnew /etc/abs/abs.conf
> > 2. rm -f /etc/abs/supfile* (not required..just cleanup)
> > 3. abs
> >
> >
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Roman Kyrylych
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds fine to me except #3 - I don't understand it (and I probably
> some users will too).
> Can you explain it please?
Basically, if you had to allow certain ports access to the net through
a firewall. rsync uses di
May as well tell the people what's happening with ABS. Here's an
announcement draft:
---8<-8<
ABS 2.0 In Testing
With version 2, ABS has moved to an rsync method for pulling the ABS
tree, as part of the changes that needed to be made for our internal
move from CVS
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
