=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 8 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 10 fully signed off packages
* 30 packages missing signoffs
* 6 packages older than 14 days
(Note:
On 24 January 2013 01:57, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
I think I need to write a news announcement for this, even though
everything should go smoothly, it never does.
---DRAFT---
Update filesystem-2013.01-1 and glibc-2.17-2 together
Due to moving of the /lib symlink from the
Am 23.01.2013 20:15, schrieb Sébastien Luttringer:
Hello,
I've cleaned all packages where I maintain rc scripts. Lukas J. has
moved the legacy to a community[1] package[2].
FYI for Lukas: I removed initscripts support from openvpn, the scripts
are still in SVN.
signature.asc
Description:
Am 24.01.2013 00:57, schrieb Allan McRae:
---DRAFT---
Update filesystem-2013.01-1 and glibc-2.17-2 together
Due to moving of the /lib symlink from the glibc package to the more
appropriate filesystem package, it is required to update glibc-2.12-2
and filesystem-2013.01-1 together. This
On 20 January 2013 20:37, Florian Pritz bluew...@xinu.at wrote:
Just for you to know we do not have read rights on /mnt/old_home/gerolde
Fixed
Hello !
We should update the wiki page [0].
Could anybody give me write access to these pages or do it please?
Thanks
[0]
On Thursday 24 January 2013 11:48:12 Guillaume Alaux wrote:
We should update the wiki page [0].
Could anybody give me write access to these pages or do it please?
Done
--
Andrea
Arch Linux Developer
Hi,
Several of the uneeded orphans has been adopted, which is great.
=== [community] ===
Here is the list for [community], that I'll now move to unsupported:
dcron
espeakup
gmerlin-avdecoder
iksemel
isomaster
libmatio
libtlen
libxml-perl
lua-sql-mysql
lua-sql-postgres
lua-sql-sqlite
mget
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote:
lua-sql-mysql
lua-sql-postgres
lua-sql-sqlite
This is part of split package luasql, which was maintained by Sergey
and was renamed during lua 5.2 upgrade. I believe he does't take it
again on archweb.
Cheers,
--
On 24/01/13 22:08, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
=== [core] ===
For [core], there are two uneeded orphans, that also aren't make
dependencies for any other [core] packages:
openldap
vi
If I may be so bold, maybe vim or another editor (still providing the
vi command) could take over for the
On Thursday 24 January 2013 13:08:23 Alexander Rødseth wrote:
A total of 23 [community] packages will be moved to unsupported. 1
package were already moved to unsupported and 4 other packages were
adopted.
+1
archlinux-wallpaper
It's a pity. I could take it just to keep it in [extra] (no
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote:
aspell-nl
hyphen-nl
I can take these two in [extra] just for the sake of keeping them
supported. If anyone else is more interested feel free to take it from
me.
Ronald
Hi,
2013/1/24 Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
I agree with just dumping vi and moving [vim] to core... But we can not
put split packages across repos and gvim and deps are not going there so
that is a no...
That is fully understandable. I guess unsplitting vim/gvim is not a
viable option
On 24/01/13 13:56, Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote:
aspell-nl
hyphen-nl
I can take these two in [extra] just for the sake of keeping them
supported. If anyone else is more interested feel free to take it from
me.
Ronald
I renamed this thread to get it more visibility.
Alexander did this list of orphans packages that can be moved to [community]:
alacarte
archlinux-wallpaper
aspell-hu
aspell-nl
aspell-pt
aspell-ru
avfs
bin86
bluez-hcidump
bmp-musepack
bmp-wma
bochs
botan
cdargs
dcfldd
devilspie
emelfm2
evilwm
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote:
bluez-hcidump
I adopted this. It will go away with the next bluez release.
Cheers,
Tom
Le 2013-01-24 07:21, Allan McRae a écrit :
On 24/01/13 22:08, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
=== [core] ===
For [core], there are two uneeded orphans, that also aren't make
dependencies for any other [core] packages:
openldap
vi
If I may be so bold, maybe vim or another editor (still providing the
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Paul Gideon Dann pdgid...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thursday 24 Jan 2013 11:05:22 Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
+1 to drop vi. I cannot imagine why someone would want to use this crap
...
We already have nano in [core], so I think that vim could stay in
[extra]
On 24.01.2013 17:05, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
+1 to drop vi. I cannot imagine why someone would want to use this crap ...
We already have nano in [core], so I think that vim could stay in
[extra] (do we really need 2 text editors in [core] ?).
Related:
alacarte
archlinux-wallpaper
aspell-hu
aspell-nl
aspell-pt
aspell-ru
avfs
bin86
bluez-hcidump
bmp-musepack
bmp-wma
bochs
botan
cdargs
dcfldd
devilspie
emelfm2
evilwm
evolution-ews
festival-english
festival-us
fltk-docs
fltk-games
fssos-nsvs
gcdmaster
gimp-dbp
gimp-gap
On 25 January 2013 00:05, Stéphane Gaudreault steph...@archlinux.orgwrote:
Le 2013-01-24 07:21, Allan McRae a écrit :
On 24/01/13 22:08, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
=== [core] ===
For [core], there are two uneeded orphans, that also aren't make
dependencies for any other [core] packages:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote:
I renamed this thread to get it more visibility.
Alexander did this list of orphans packages that can be moved to [community]:
We should only move packages to [community] if a TU is interested in
adopting them.
Hi,
As far as I can tell from FS#20778, e3 was not evaluated. e3 provides
Wordstar, Emacs, Pico, Vi and Nedit-like behavior, by using
differently named symbolic links to /usr/bin/e3.
It is unclear why the default editor _has to_ be a vi-replacement, as
that excludes editors such as joe, jed or
There is nothing stopping us dropping vi completely and just putting vim
on the install media...
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
There is nothing stopping us dropping vi completely and just putting vim
on the install media...
I'd favor that (as a vim user who always gets confused by vi on the
install media).
-t
24 matches
Mail list logo