[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

2013-01-24 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 8 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 10 fully signed off packages * 30 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note:

Re: [arch-dev-public] Toolchain changes

2013-01-24 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 24 January 2013 01:57, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: I think I need to write a news announcement for this, even though everything should go smoothly, it never does. ---DRAFT--- Update filesystem-2013.01-1 and glibc-2.17-2 together Due to moving of the /lib symlink from the

Re: [arch-dev-public] Clarity about initscripts and systemd status

2013-01-24 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 23.01.2013 20:15, schrieb Sébastien Luttringer: Hello, I've cleaned all packages where I maintain rc scripts. Lukas J. has moved the legacy to a community[1] package[2]. FYI for Lukas: I removed initscripts support from openvpn, the scripts are still in SVN. signature.asc Description:

Re: [arch-dev-public] Toolchain changes

2013-01-24 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 24.01.2013 00:57, schrieb Allan McRae: ---DRAFT--- Update filesystem-2013.01-1 and glibc-2.17-2 together Due to moving of the /lib symlink from the glibc package to the more appropriate filesystem package, it is required to update glibc-2.12-2 and filesystem-2013.01-1 together. This

Re: [arch-dev-public] Nymeria Migration Guide for extra

2013-01-24 Thread Guillaume Alaux
On 20 January 2013 20:37, Florian Pritz bluew...@xinu.at wrote: Just for you to know we do not have read rights on /mnt/old_home/gerolde Fixed Hello ! We should update the wiki page [0]. Could anybody give me write access to these pages or do it please? Thanks [0]

Re: [arch-dev-public] Nymeria Migration Guide for extra

2013-01-24 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Thursday 24 January 2013 11:48:12 Guillaume Alaux wrote: We should update the wiki page [0]. Could anybody give me write access to these pages or do it please? Done -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community]

2013-01-24 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi, Several of the uneeded orphans has been adopted, which is great. === [community] === Here is the list for [community], that I'll now move to unsupported: dcron espeakup gmerlin-avdecoder iksemel isomaster libmatio libtlen libxml-perl lua-sql-mysql lua-sql-postgres lua-sql-sqlite mget

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community]

2013-01-24 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: lua-sql-mysql lua-sql-postgres lua-sql-sqlite This is part of split package luasql, which was maintained by Sergey and was renamed during lua 5.2 upgrade. I believe he does't take it again on archweb. Cheers, --

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community]

2013-01-24 Thread Allan McRae
On 24/01/13 22:08, Alexander Rødseth wrote: === [core] === For [core], there are two uneeded orphans, that also aren't make dependencies for any other [core] packages: openldap vi If I may be so bold, maybe vim or another editor (still providing the vi command) could take over for the

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community]

2013-01-24 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Thursday 24 January 2013 13:08:23 Alexander Rødseth wrote: A total of 23 [community] packages will be moved to unsupported. 1 package were already moved to unsupported and 4 other packages were adopted. +1 archlinux-wallpaper It's a pity. I could take it just to keep it in [extra] (no

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community]

2013-01-24 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote: aspell-nl hyphen-nl I can take these two in [extra] just for the sake of keeping them supported. If anyone else is more interested feel free to take it from me. Ronald

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community]

2013-01-24 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi, 2013/1/24 Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org: I agree with just dumping vi and moving [vim] to core... But we can not put split packages across repos and gvim and deps are not going there so that is a no... That is fully understandable. I guess unsplitting vim/gvim is not a viable option

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community]

2013-01-24 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 24/01/13 13:56, Ronald van Haren wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote: aspell-nl hyphen-nl I can take these two in [extra] just for the sake of keeping them supported. If anyone else is more interested feel free to take it from me. Ronald

[arch-dev-public] Winter Cleanup of [extra]

2013-01-24 Thread Andrea Scarpino
I renamed this thread to get it more visibility. Alexander did this list of orphans packages that can be moved to [community]: alacarte archlinux-wallpaper aspell-hu aspell-nl aspell-pt aspell-ru avfs bin86 bluez-hcidump bmp-musepack bmp-wma bochs botan cdargs dcfldd devilspie emelfm2 evilwm

Re: [arch-dev-public] Winter Cleanup of [extra]

2013-01-24 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote: bluez-hcidump I adopted this. It will go away with the next bluez release. Cheers, Tom

[arch-dev-public] Drop VI from [core] (was Re: [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community])

2013-01-24 Thread Stéphane Gaudreault
Le 2013-01-24 07:21, Allan McRae a écrit : On 24/01/13 22:08, Alexander Rødseth wrote: === [core] === For [core], there are two uneeded orphans, that also aren't make dependencies for any other [core] packages: openldap vi If I may be so bold, maybe vim or another editor (still providing the

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] Drop VI from [core] (was Re: Winter Cleanup of [community])

2013-01-24 Thread Dave Reisner
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Paul Gideon Dann pdgid...@gmail.comwrote: On Thursday 24 Jan 2013 11:05:22 Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: +1 to drop vi. I cannot imagine why someone would want to use this crap ... We already have nano in [core], so I think that vim could stay in [extra]

Re: [arch-dev-public] Drop VI from [core] (was Re: [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community])

2013-01-24 Thread Florian Pritz
On 24.01.2013 17:05, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: +1 to drop vi. I cannot imagine why someone would want to use this crap ... We already have nano in [core], so I think that vim could stay in [extra] (do we really need 2 text editors in [core] ?). Related:

Re: [arch-dev-public] Winter Cleanup of [extra]

2013-01-24 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman
alacarte archlinux-wallpaper aspell-hu aspell-nl aspell-pt aspell-ru avfs bin86 bluez-hcidump bmp-musepack bmp-wma bochs botan cdargs dcfldd devilspie emelfm2 evilwm evolution-ews festival-english festival-us fltk-docs fltk-games fssos-nsvs gcdmaster gimp-dbp gimp-gap

Re: [arch-dev-public] Drop VI from [core] (was Re: [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community])

2013-01-24 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman
On 25 January 2013 00:05, Stéphane Gaudreault steph...@archlinux.orgwrote: Le 2013-01-24 07:21, Allan McRae a écrit : On 24/01/13 22:08, Alexander Rødseth wrote: === [core] === For [core], there are two uneeded orphans, that also aren't make dependencies for any other [core] packages:

Re: [arch-dev-public] Winter Cleanup of [extra]

2013-01-24 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote: I renamed this thread to get it more visibility. Alexander did this list of orphans packages that can be moved to [community]: We should only move packages to [community] if a TU is interested in adopting them.

Re: [arch-dev-public] Drop VI from [core] (was Re: [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community])

2013-01-24 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi, As far as I can tell from FS#20778, e3 was not evaluated. e3 provides Wordstar, Emacs, Pico, Vi and Nedit-like behavior, by using differently named symbolic links to /usr/bin/e3. It is unclear why the default editor _has to_ be a vi-replacement, as that excludes editors such as joe, jed or

Re: [arch-dev-public] Drop VI from [core] (was Re: [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community])

2013-01-24 Thread Allan McRae
There is nothing stopping us dropping vi completely and just putting vim on the install media...

Re: [arch-dev-public] Drop VI from [core] (was Re: [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community])

2013-01-24 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: There is nothing stopping us dropping vi completely and just putting vim on the install media... I'd favor that (as a vim user who always gets confused by vi on the install media). -t