[2020-01-06 16:48:48 -0300] Giancarlo Razzolini:
> I'm moving this to staff@, please stop replying on a-d-p. Doing dirty laundry
> in public is not necessary.
And I'm moving this back to arch-dev-public because most staff aren't
concerned with posting news items. Besides, there's nothing secret
[2020-01-05 21:27:19 -0300] Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-dev-public:
> Em janeiro 5, 2020 21:04 Allan McRae via arch-dev-public escreveu:
> >
> > Do we really need to write down everything? Have we reached a point in
> > the distro where common sense has stopped? Why would an announcement
> >
Em janeiro 5, 2020 21:04 Allan McRae via arch-dev-public escreveu:
My apologies. I believed this had been covered on the mailing list and
I am told it was only on IRC, and never passed on to the TU channel,
which I will accept as an excuse despite everyone(?) involved but the
poster being on
On 6/1/20 9:12 am, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Em janeiro 5, 2020 19:25 Allan McRae via arch-dev-public escreveu:
>>
>> Read the original message and not the partial quote that you made. I
>> explicitly said there was an exception for --overwrite type posts.
>>
>> But any restriction being made
Em janeiro 5, 2020 19:25 Allan McRae via arch-dev-public escreveu:
Read the original message and not the partial quote that you made. I
explicitly said there was an exception for --overwrite type posts.
But any restriction being made on posting due to not posting drafts to
the list would be
Excerpts from Allan McRae via arch-dev-public's message of January 5, 2020
23:27:
After the base metapackage pile of crap that was posted, I (and others)
reminded everyone of the process that had been held for years.
The response was complaints that this process was not followed recently,
to
On 6/1/20 8:04 am, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 07:53:21AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
> wrote:
>> Following the roll out of the base metapackage, and its poorly written
>> news post, we agreed that all new posts should have a draft posted to
>>
On 6/1/20 8:17 am, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 11:10:17PM +0100, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via
> arch-dev-public wrote:
>> On 05/01/2020 23.04, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 07:53:21AM +1000, Allan McRae via
On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 11:10:17PM +0100, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via
arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 05/01/2020 23.04, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 07:53:21AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
> > wrote:
> >> Following the roll out of the base
On 05/01/2020 23.04, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 07:53:21AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
> wrote:
>> Following the roll out of the base metapackage, and its poorly written
>> news post, we agreed that all new posts should have a draft posted to
On 1/5/20 11:04 PM, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 07:53:21AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
> wrote:
>> Following the roll out of the base metapackage, and its poorly written
>> news post, we agreed that all new posts should have a draft posted to
>>
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 07:53:21AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Following the roll out of the base metapackage, and its poorly written
> news post, we agreed that all new posts should have a draft posted to
> arch-dev-public.
Wait, where was this agreed? I heard something about
Hi all,
Following the roll out of the base metapackage, and its poorly written
news post, we agreed that all new posts should have a draft posted to
arch-dev-public. There was a potential exclusion for trivial
--overwrite posts [1].
This was followed for the Xorg update. It was not followed
13 matches
Mail list logo