AFAIK most customers don't run the single profile we provide. EG: sometime
store+publisher in a single node make scene, sometimes store alone is
better, same thing for keymanger+tragicmanger.
So isn't it better if we can individually turn them on and off.
EG:
./server.sh -profiles store,publisher
Please note that during a discussion this week, we decided that instead of
all carbon servers running on the same ports, each of the 5 products will
have their own well known ports. For example, APIM GW port will be 8084
(just an example). So while we would still have portOffset support, we
won't n
The options are either build all the different distributions at runtime
itself or provide a tool to create the different runtime from a base
distribution. If we build all the individual runtimes at build time and
package it into a single archive, the download time will be bigger cz
there'll be many
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:09 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Nuwan Dias wrote:
>
>> Do we really need multi-profile support (at an osgi level) on C5? What if
>> we have separate dedicated runtimes per profile? Which means that we have a
>> gateway runtime, stor
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Kishanthan Thangarajah wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Nuwan Dias wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Kishanthan Thangarajah <
>> kishant...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Nuwan Dias wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Nuwan Dias wrote:
> Do we really need multi-profile support (at an osgi level) on C5? What if
> we have separate dedicated runtimes per profile? Which means that we have a
> gateway runtime, store runtime, etc. within the same distribution? Each
> will run on its
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Nuwan Dias wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Kishanthan Thangarajah <
> kishant...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Nuwan Dias wrote:
>>
>>> Do we really need multi-profile support (at an osgi level) on C5? What
>>> if we h
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Kishanthan Thangarajah wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Nuwan Dias wrote:
>
>> Do we really need multi-profile support (at an osgi level) on C5? What if
>> we have separate dedicated runtimes per profile? Which means that we have a
>> gateway runtime
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Nuwan Dias wrote:
> Do we really need multi-profile support (at an osgi level) on C5? What if
> we have separate dedicated runtimes per profile? Which means that we have a
> gateway runtime, store runtime, etc. within the same distribution? Each
> will run on its
Do we really need multi-profile support (at an osgi level) on C5? What if
we have separate dedicated runtimes per profile? Which means that we have a
gateway runtime, store runtime, etc. within the same distribution? Each
will run on its own port, maybe using offsets by default (no need to worry
ab
10 matches
Mail list logo
