I'm not sure how to say this in the most diplomatic way possible, but
why not explore other options just in case? Is an org that fails to
consider backup plans really something that rises to the level of a
community problem that needs a special policy?"
"Who are all these people that "
learn from this mistake in future changes.
Thanks,
Tom Pruitt
Network Engineer
Stratus Networks
This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it are the property of Stratus
Networks, Inc. and/or its affiliates, are confidential, and are intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity
I support this proposal.
Thanks,
Tom Pruitt
Network Engineer
Stratus Networks
(309)408-8704
[stratus_networks_logo_FINAL]
This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it are the property of Stratus
Networks, Inc. and/or its affiliates, are confidential, and are intended solely
for the use
the implementation of 2019-16.
Yes the problem is the lack of IPv6 deployment, I don't think anyone can argue
that.
Thanks,
Tom Pruitt
Network Engineer
Stratus Networks
This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it are the property of Stratus
Networks, Inc. and/or its affiliates, are confidential
organizations from the
wait list.
Thanks,
Tom Pruitt
Network Engineer
Stratus Networks
[stratus_networks_logo_FINAL]
This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it are the property of Stratus
Networks, Inc. and/or its affiliates, are confidential, and are intended solely
for the use
I believe the number of orgs that were dropped from the list was either 33 or
34, that would be the number eligible to be grandfathered.
Thanks,
Tom Pruitt
Network Engineer
Stratus Networks
(309)408-8704
[stratus_networks_logo_FINAL]
This e-mail, and any files transmitted
a /22 regardless of current holdings). Either of
those would have been fair and impartial, but that is not what happened. This
proposal is an attempt to address that in the only available method.
Thanks,
Tom Pruitt
Network Engineer
Stratus Networks
[stratus_networks_logo_FINAL]
This e-mail
I am in favor of at least the new policy below. Actually I’m in favor of views
2, 3, or 4 but I can support the new policy below. During the meeting, it
appeared a large majority of the people who had views were in support of doing
something for these organizations.
Thanks,
Tom Pruitt
That would be correct.
What to do with the people already on the current list need to be addressed
clearly.
Thanks,
Tom Pruitt
Network Engineer
Stratus Networks
From: John Curran
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2019 2:34 PM
To: Tom Pruitt
Cc: ARIN-PPML List
Subject: Re: Looking for final show
” those orgs.
Thanks,
Tom Pruitt
Network Engineer
Stratus Networks
From: ARIN-PPML On Behalf Of John Curran
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2019 12:21 PM
To: ARIN-PPML List
Subject: [arin-ppml] Looking for final show of support on revised Advisory
Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests
Well said, this is pretty much exactly how I feel.
Thanks,
Tom Pruitt
From: ARIN-PPML On Behalf Of Tom Fantacone
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 2:38 PM
To: ARIN
Cc: arin-ppml
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Revised - Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding
NRPM 4.1.8. Unmet Requests
Keeping in mind
organizations that
were on the list prior to the freeze. They should get something. Maybe the
limit before the freeze is a /19, then after the freeze it goes down, maybe the
limit is a /22 for all organizations on the list (before and after).
Thanks,
Tom Pruitt
Network Engineer
Stratus
tions from the list at this point.
Thanks,
Tom Pruitt
-Original Message-
From: ARIN-PPML On Behalf Of ARIN
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 12:05 PM
To: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: [arin-ppml] Revised - Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding NRPM
4.1.8. Unmet Requests
At their 16 M
after
Feb 7 2019 ( the date the suspension was posted) would be subject to the new
policy, whatever that may be.
Tom Pruitt
From: ARIN-PPML On Behalf Of Tom Fantacone
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 9:01 AM
To: John Curran
Cc: arin-ppml
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Advisory Council Recommendation
are available then they should get the allocation.
Thanks,
Tom Pruitt
Network Engineer
Stratus Networks
[stratus_networks_logo_FINAL]
From: David Farmer
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 3:44 PM
To: Tom Pruitt
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Fwd: Advisory Council Recommendation Regarding
to them. These policy changes and
decisions affect the smaller entities greatly, and they need some clarity.
Thanks,
Tom Pruitt
Network Engineer
Stratus Networks
[stratus_networks_logo_FINAL]
From: ARIN-PPML On Behalf Of Andrew Dul
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 4:09 PM
To: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject
16 matches
Mail list logo
