Re: Charity

2003-06-05 Thread Eric Crampton
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Jason DeBacker wrote: > Is it not possible that there is some common goods problem? People not > helping b/c they think others will? The general welfare of others is a > public good afterall, right?- (non-rival, non-excludable) Exceedingly implausible in the Africa case. On

charity and time preference

2003-06-05 Thread Wei Dai
Suppose I have some money that I don't want to spend, and I'm sure I'll never want to spend it. Should I give it to charity now, or put it in an index fund and bequeath it to charity in my will? Here's my argument in favor of charitable procrastination. The typical recipient of charity does not ha

OT: a blow on the head

2003-06-05 Thread Anton Sherwood
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This reminds me of an old Monty Python sketch Here, I found the script: [...] Well your first question for the blow on the head this evening is: what great opponent of Cartesian dualism resists the reduction of psychological phenomena to physical states? I don't know

Re: Charity

2003-06-05 Thread AdmrlLocke
This reminds me of an old Monty Python sketch that had a line in which the game-show host offered the contestant a choice: "Would you like the nice gift package, or a hit on the head?" To which the game-show contestant replied: "Ah, I'll take the hit on the head!" (or "I'll take the 'it on the

Re: Charity

2003-06-05 Thread Jason DeBacker
Is it not possible that there is some common goods problem? People not helping b/c they think others will? The general welfare of others is a public good afterall, right?- (non-rival, non-excludable) I think it is reasonable to say that there is not an efficient level of charity (at least in the

RE: TV seasons

2003-06-05 Thread Michael Giesbrecht
> -Original Message- > From: Wei Dai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Why does TV have seasons? I know it's customary to propose possible > answers to questions posted here, but I'm really stumped. I > can't think of > any reason why television networks all premier their new shows in the

RE: TV Seasons

2003-06-05 Thread zgocheno
Wei Dai asked: >Why does TV have seasons? I know it's customary to propose possible >answers to questions posted here, but I'm really stumped. I can't think >of any reason why television networks all premier their new shows in >the fall and play re-runs in the summer, instead of spreading out th

Re: Charity

2003-06-05 Thread Alex Tabarrok
Eric has me as being nicer than I actually am. I would give up a leg to cure AIDS. For SARS I would take a kick in the leg. Alex -- Alexander Tabarrok Department of Economics, MSN 1D3 George Mason University Fairfax, VA, 22030 Tel. 703-993-2314 Web Page: http://mason.gmu.edu/~atabarro/

Re: Charity

2003-06-05 Thread Bryan Caplan
Jason DeBacker wrote: And the answer is: - People really don’t care about helping someone else, but are ashamed to admit that. How could it be anything else? -- Prof. Bryan Caplan Department of Economics George Mason University http://www.bcaplan.com

Re: Charity

2003-06-05 Thread Mikhail Gambarian
I was somewhat wrong in my previous email about Bill Gates and Malaria. What I actually read was this: More public money should also be spent on the search for new treatments, to tackle drug-resistant strains of the disease, and to find a vaccine. The latter quest depends far too much on a sin

Re: TV seasons

2003-06-05 Thread Robin Hanson
Wei Dai asked: Why does TV have seasons? I know it's customary to propose possible answers to questions posted here, but I'm really stumped. I can't think of any reason why television networks all premier their new shows in the fall and play re-runs in the summer, instead of spreading out the premi

Re: Charity

2003-06-05 Thread Mikhail Gambarian
I think this is like example from economics textbooks: a) We have common goods problem. Even if you will not help save these child's, may be someone else will. You cannot help everybody. Of course this is for usual people, not superrich. For example, I heard something like Bill Gates paying for

Re: Charity

2003-06-05 Thread Eric Crampton
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Jason DeBacker wrote: > -- I listed as one possibility that people are ashamed to > admit their preferences. I feel the same way as you do, but > I am not sure all people think like that. Some probably > actually care about saving lives instead of having HBO, but > for so

broadcast spectrum rent

2003-06-05 Thread Fred Foldvary
--- Wei Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the broadcast spectrum currently used > for television may be worth as much as $400 billion in an auction. How > are the 15% of households who still watch TV over the air able to prevent > this spectrum from being sold for another use? They should not be ab