n list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of RainingRemedy
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 1:07 AM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug?
>
> Jesus,
>
> This is not considered a bug. The AssetLifeCycle status field has been
> effec
pated.
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of RainingRemedy
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 1:07 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug?
Jesus,
This is not considered a bug. The AssetLife
erson
Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of RainingRemedy
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 1:07 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug?
Jesus,
This is not cons
Jesus,
This is not considered a bug. The AssetLifeCycle status field has been
effectively moved from the CMDB forms and placed on the AST:Attributes form.
The Status field you see is just the leftover core field that is not being
used. From what I've read, I don't think there is any plan to use
@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Roger Justice
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 11:26 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug?
** This is a process issue and not a reconciliation issue. The concept of not
merging CIs into BMC.Asset until additional non discoverable data is available
create one.
-Original Message-
From: Ortega, Jesus A
To: arslist
Sent: Thu, Jan 16, 2014 12:19 pm
Subject: Re: CMDB 8.1 Status bug?
**
Here is the scenario:
ยท I have a dataset that receives assets from a SAP system. When the CIs
get there they are in Received status
ort...@lyondellbasell.com>>
To: arslist mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>>
Sent: Thu, Jan 16, 2014 11:32 am
Subject: CMDB 8.1 Status bug?
**
I have run into a potential bug in Atrium 8.1. BMC, in its infinite wisdom,
decided to disperse a lot of fields that were once on BMC.CORE:BMC_
Yeah :: another bug:: do not uninstall the application Web services: (BMC
said too to fix an issue with integrator) -- now we are stuck.
one application (the uninstaller) says the application is not installed,
the installer application says "it is already installed"... so which is
it..
BMC is havi
am
Subject: CMDB 8.1 Status bug?
**
I have run into a potential bug in Atrium 8.1. BMC, in its infinite wisdom,
decided to disperse a lot of fields that were once on BMC.CORE:BMC_BaseElement
to BMC.CORE:BMC_ComputerSystem and a new form AST:Atributes. Additionally, they
renamed
Did you also notice that the form structure changed in CMDB 8.x? Rather
than a relatively flat structure, what you have now is nested joins (as
deep as 6 levels) that mirror the structure of the CDM. So that, at least
in part, explains the more relational data structure you're seeing. I can
see
I have run into a potential bug in Atrium 8.1. BMC, in its infinite wisdom,
decided to disperse a lot of fields that were once on BMC.CORE:BMC_BaseElement
to BMC.CORE:BMC_ComputerSystem and a new form AST:Atributes. Additionally, they
renamed BMC.CORE:BMC_ComputerSystem AssetLifecycleStatus to s
11 matches
Mail list logo
