Re: DNS entry for Server Group

2010-11-16 Thread Murnane, Phil
- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of strauss Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 17:04 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: DNS entry for Server Group I tried a different approach the end of last week, and hit another brick wall today

Re: DNS entry for Server Group

2010-11-16 Thread strauss
Of Murnane, Phil Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 9:46 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: DNS entry for Server Group Christopher: Ran into a customer a while back who had two stand-alone ITSM 7.5 servers they wanted to reconfigure to a server group, and BMC provided the following procedure: 1

Re: DNS entry for Server Group

2010-11-16 Thread strauss
Of Murnane, Phil Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 9:46 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: DNS entry for Server Group Christopher: Ran into a customer a while back who had two stand-alone ITSM 7.5 servers they wanted to reconfigure to a server group, and BMC provided the following procedure: 1

Re: DNS entry for Server Group

2010-11-15 Thread strauss
) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Murnane, Phil Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 1:07 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: DNS entry for Server Group Christopher: Did you ever get you 7.6.03 server group to fail over properly? I have a customer that's planning to update their 7.1 ARS server

Re: DNS entry for Server Group

2010-11-11 Thread Murnane, Phil
discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of strauss Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 17:57 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: DNS entry for Server Group Off-list hints led me to add an A record in the Active Directory DNS in my forest for each IP address - the admin server

Re: DNS entry for Server Group

2010-11-11 Thread strauss
of North Texas Computing IT Center http://itsm.unt.edu/ -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Murnane, Phil Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 1:07 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: DNS entry for Server Group

Re: DNS entry for Server Group

2010-11-11 Thread Danny Kellett
discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of strauss Sent: 11 November 2010 19:56 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: DNS entry for Server Group I never got the apps to install properly - ITSM 7.6.03 refused to install in a server group environment, even with the admin

Re: DNS entry for Server Group

2010-11-11 Thread Murnane, Phil
Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of strauss Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 14:56 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: DNS entry for Server Group I never got the apps to install properly - ITSM 7.6.03 refused to install in a server group

Re: DNS entry for Server Group

2010-11-11 Thread strauss
://itsm.unt.edu/ -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Danny Kellett Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 2:46 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: DNS entry for Server Group You have to remember that if the AR Server

Re: DNS entry for Server Group

2010-11-01 Thread strauss
://itsm.unt.edu/ -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Murnane, Phil Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 4:00 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: DNS entry for Server Group Funny you should mention this Christopher

DNS entry for Server Group

2010-10-28 Thread strauss
I am experimenting with a server group for 7.6.03, but had not planned to use a load balancer for a variety of reasons. This is driven in part by the need to run multiple mid-tiers with different settings for different groups, as we may be forced to make mid-tier primary in 7.6.03 because so

Re: DNS entry for Server Group

2010-10-28 Thread Murnane, Phil
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 16:20 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: DNS entry for Server Group I am experimenting with a server group for 7.6.03, but had not planned to use a load balancer for a variety of reasons. This is driven in part by the need to run multiple mid-tiers with different