16, 2009 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
** I've used thick client/thin client to differentiate the clients. But
that was back in the days of arweb/remedy web (did I get that right; the
cobwebs are getting thick).
Axton
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:40 PM
2009/4/18 Louise Van Hine lvanh...@yahoo.com:
**
never heard or used the term fat client - when ARWeb first came out it was
billed as the thin client in contradistinction to the thick client WUT.
Back in the good old days of the UNIX-only server version, there was an
Due to lack of beeing
Axton,
I think I was more like this:
RemedyWeb was the thick web client (applet based), (AKA Fat web client)
ARWeb was the thin web client (DHTML/Javascript based)
WUT was the v4 Windows User Tool (Maybe also called the FAT client.
Note it is fatter than the Fat web client by two more capital
I need help now. I had the fat client installed on my PC, and thought I would
be a nice guy and help it lose some weight. So I deleted the contents of the
C:\Home directory and C:\Program Files\AR System\User\resdlls\ which did make
it thinner, but now it doesn't work.
Any suggestions? Is
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 7:43 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
Axton,
I think I was more like
@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
I need help now. I had the fat client installed on my PC, and thought I would
be a nice guy and help it lose some weight. So I deleted the contents of the
C:\Home directory and C:\Program Files\AR System\User\resdlls\ which
17, 2009 7:43 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
Axton,
I think I was more like this:
RemedyWeb was the thick web client (applet based), (AKA Fat web client)
ARWeb was the thin web client (DHTML/Javascript based)
WUT was the v4 Windows
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
** I've used thick client/thin client to differentiate the clients. But
that was back in the days of arweb/remedy web (did I get that right; the
cobwebs are getting thick).
Axton
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Chowdhury, Tauf
: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of Reiser, John J
Sent: Fri 4/17/2009 9:38 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
How about the dumb client? ARText Ver 1.5
---
John J. Reiser
Senior Software Development Analyst
Remedy
doors now.
:)
J.T. Shyman
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of Reiser,
John J
Sent: Fri 4/17/2009 9:38 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
How about the dumb client? ARText Ver 1.5
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
**
Since '95 I don't recall Remedy ever referring to it as the FAT client.
Whenever I heard the term I thought it was an old geek term especially
once web became more prolific. And as with most THIN clients in the
past they did not have
for BMC Software, Inc.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Sanford, Claire
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 11:13 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
**
Bravo
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
** Since '95 I don't recall Remedy ever referring to it as the FAT
client. Whenever I heard the term I thought it was an old geek term
especially once web became more prolific. And as with most THIN clients
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 3:13 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: OT: Friday Humor: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
**
Now THIN client has improved but will never be quite as good as the
FAT client but many will continue to overlook that.
I humbly disagree, and I thought
, 2009 12:33 PM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
** Since '95 I don't recall Remedy ever referring to it as the FAT
client. Whenever I heard the term I thought it was an old geek term
especially once web became more prolific. And as with most
-Original Message-
From: Shyman, Jonathan jshy...@columnit.com
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:23:00
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Friday Humor: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
Not bad, David, not bad.
Here's a suggestion for your rapper name: B. MC
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Friday Humor: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
**
Indeed. That's a very solid effort, David, especially coming from a
middle-aged white guy. I would NOT recommend doing this at the next
executive meeting, though. I am sure you're way ahead of me
AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
**
Bravo Susan! I couldn't have said it better myself!
Go FAT!
What a bunch of sizeists!
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
] On Behalf Of Susan Palmer
Sent
, April 17, 2009 12:33 PM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
** Since '95 I don't recall Remedy ever referring to it as the FAT
client. Whenever I heard the term I thought it was an old geek term
especially once web became more prolific
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
** Since '95 I don't recall Remedy ever referring to it as the FAT
client. Whenever I heard the term I thought it was an old geek term
especially once web became more prolific. And as with most THIN clients
never heard or used the term fat client - when ARWeb first came out it was
billed as the thin client in contradistinction to the thick client WUT.
Back in the good old days of the UNIX-only server version, there was an ASCII
client. Otherwise known as the anorexic client.
I've suddenly realized that WUT stands for windows user tool. When did we
stop saying fat client and thin client or mid tier?
Are fat and thin outmoded with today's networking capabilities, or simply
offensive with today's caloric-challenged society? Someone please answer
definitively,
to
the Mid-Tier...but that's just me...:)
_
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Meyer, Jennifer L
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:54 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
**
I've
Subject: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
Sent: Apr 16, 2009 4:53 PM
** I’ve suddenly realized that “WUT” stands for “windows user tool.” When did
we stop saying “fat client” and “thin client” or “mid tier?”
Are “fat” and “”thin” outmoded with today’s networking capabilities, or simply
: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
Jennifer,
The desktop client has been referred to by many names over the years. WUT is
actually an old name that has been around for a long time. Probably was used
much more in the past than fat/thin client.
--Original Message--
From
-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Meyer, Jennifer L
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:08 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
Thanks, David. It appears I just hadn't run across the acronym
)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Easter, David
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:27 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
In case you run into it, you'll also see folks use WAT for Windows
Administration Tool. Now that it's called Developer
...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Meyer, Jennifer L
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:34 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
I expect most of the folks who don't move up to 7.5 will have to refer to the
Admin Tool as the True Windows Administration Tool
...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Meyer, Jennifer L
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:34 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
I expect most of the folks who don't move up to 7.5 will have to refer to
the Admin Tool as the True Windows Administration Tool
)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Meyer, Jennifer L
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:34 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
I expect most of the folks who don't move up to 7.5 will have to refer to
the Admin Tool as the True Windows
: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
I expect most of the folks who don't move up to 7.5 will have to
refer to the Admin Tool as the True Windows Administration Tool to
differentiate it from the Developer Studio.
I couldn't resist
Jennifer Meyer
-Original Message-
From
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:34 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
I expect most of the folks who don't move up to 7.5 will have to refer to
the Admin Tool as the True Windows Administration Tool to differentiate it
from the Developer
32 matches
Mail list logo
