,
--Phil
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Axton
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 21:25
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: VM Processors, one or two?
** It all depends on how much time you want to spend waiting on the CMDB. You
can try 1
** **
*From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Axton
*Sent:* Thursday, July 12, 2012 21:25
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: VM Processors, one or two?
** **
** It all depends on how much time you want to spend
] On Behalf Of patchsk
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 4:36 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: VM Processors, one or two?
**
The ITSM/CMDB is very bulky and there are lot of sub processes like
reconciliation,normalization, aie, fts etc...
I would suggest you follow BMCs hardware requirement
Many thanks for all the responses everyone.
I'm going to ask my SA how many cores the processors have and we'll go from
there. BTW he's saying that adding or dropping CPUs after the fact may be
causing some bluescreens, so I'll lobby for two CPUs and 8 gigs of RAM.
Drew
System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Drew Shuller
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 8:45 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: VM Processors, one or two?
** Many thanks for all the responses everyone.
I'm going to ask my SA how many cores the processors have
Thanks LJ. I'll bring that up as well.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC
lj.longwing@mda.mil wrote:
Shouldn't do it 'live' by any means...any time CPU is added/removed you
should certainly shut down before that reconfig and then restart (sometimes
twice)
: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Drew Shuller
Sent: 13 July 2012 15:53
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: VM Processors, one or two?
** Thanks LJ. I'll bring that up as well.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC
Good afternoon everyone. We're in the process of building a virtual server
for a very small ITSM/CMDB/ADDM installation. BMC's hardware docs state
that the server should have two processors. We're thinking that we can get
by with only one. Any thoughts?
Thank you in advance.
Drew Shuller
Remedy
Drew,
you are at a base.. come on.. 2 cpu's with loads of RAM.. minimum..
you might be able to get away with 1 but your going to have contention.. so
just tell the commander, don't be such a cheap skate..
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Drew Shuller drew.shul...@gmail.comwrote:
** Good
The ITSM/CMDB is very bulky and there are lot of sub processes like
reconciliation,normalization, aie, fts etc...
I would suggest you follow BMCs hardware requirement to have better
performance in your production env.
The last time I spoke to our SA he told me that in a Virtual machine a
...@gmail.com
To: arslist arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thu, Jul 12, 2012 7:51 pm
Subject: VM Processors, one or two?
**Good afternoon everyone. We're in the process of building a virtual server
for a very small ITSM/CMDB/ADDM installation. BMC's hardware docs state that
the server should have two
and it
will need to have dedicated Cores and RAM, you need to check the ADDM manuals.
-Original Message-
From: Drew Shuller drew.shul...@gmail.com
To: arslist arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thu, Jul 12, 2012 7:51 pm
Subject: VM Processors, one or two?
** Good afternoon everyone. We're
It all depends on how much time you want to spend waiting on the CMDB. You
can try 1, but if you start to hit timeouts (which, btw, probably means
some type of unrecoverable or a PITA to recover failure), I would suggest
you bump it up to 2. The installation process alone will probably time
out;
13 matches
Mail list logo
