Re: ARS 8.0. RedHat 5 = 6 migration

2015-08-20 Thread frex popo
Thanks Shafkat/Jason.
I will have to reconsider v8 and may be install v7 instead or stick with v6​

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Jason Miller jason.mil...@gmail.com
wrote:

 **
 Yeah, I agree. I am thinking with ARS/ITSM 8.x that Java 7 is the safe
 bet. If you were looking at ARS/ITSM 9 then I would say give Java 8 serious
 consideration.

 Jason

 On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Shafqat Ayaz shafq...@yahoo.com wrote:

 **
 Hi
 I had major problems with Java 8. After talking to BMC Support I had to
 go back to v6. I don't know if this has been fixed in the meantime.



 *Shafqat Ayaz*


 --
 *From:* frex popo frexpo...@gmail.com
 *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 *Sent:* Wednesday, August 19, 2015 11:11 AM
 *Subject:* Re: ARS 8.0. RedHat 5 = 6 migration

 **
 Thanks Jason
 I checked the Knowlege Base and saw few issues with Java8 and ARS8.1 and
 other issues but nothing related to ARS8.0...So still investigating.

 Thanks​



 On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Jason Miller jason.mil...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 **
 I remember seeing something in the past about Java 8 and ARS and/or ITSM
 8.x incompatibility. Is java 8 listed on the comparability matrix for
 Remedy 8?

 It may have been addressed in an update but wanted give a heads up. I
 don't remember the exact details. It is either mentioned her on the list or
 the BMC Communities (well and kb.bmc.com probably).

 Jason

 On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:38 PM, frex popo frexpo...@gmail.com wrote:

 **
 ​We are migrating ARS/ITSM 8.0 OS from Linux RedHat5 to Linux 6 and all
 the rest stays the same, apart from Java We are planning on
 installing Java v8 instead of the current version Java v6. Anyone
 encounters some problems with having ARS/ITSM 8.0 running Java v8?

 Best Regards
 frex
 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_


 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_


 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_


 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_


 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: How to retrieve a report consisting of the last logged in users in remedy 8.1

2015-08-20 Thread Misi Mladoniczky
Hi,

You need to be an Administrator to turn License Tracking on.

Go to Admin Console - System - General - Server Information -
Configuration - License Tracking.

The filter/custom-form suggestion is to make it easier to use. Without this
customization you will just need to report on the complete set of data created
in the AR System Historical License Usage form.

Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)

Ask the Remedy Licensing Experts (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11/12/13):
* RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
* RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.

 How to turn on the licence tracking in ar system.?
 Is there any OOB mechanism to achieve this requirement.

 Regards,
 Abhi
 On 20 Aug 2015 01:46, Misi Mladoniczky m...@rrr.se wrote:

 Hi,

 I would turn on License Tracking, which creates a record in AR System
 Historical License Usage upon each session. There you have the login date.
 Make sure to truncate old data, as the number of records grow.

 You can create a filter to that form that updates a custom form of yours
 with
 the last logged in user. It is enough with just a single record in that
 custom
 form.

 Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)

 Ask the Remedy Licensing Experts (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11/12/13):
 * RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
 * RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
 Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.

  Hi Experts,
 
 
  Please guide us on how to fetch a report consisting of the users who last
  logged in with there timestamp in remedy 8.1.
 
 
  Early help will be highly appreciated.
 
 
  Cheers,
 
  Abhi..
 
 
 ___
  UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
  Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years
 


 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: ARERR 9755 - any experience with this error? - resolved with libfreebl2.so deletions as per Fred's email

2015-08-20 Thread Ben Chernys
Thanks Fred,

 

That seemed to clear everything up.  Interestingly, the source of the cloned
machine still has the same set of libraries and is working fine.  Of course,
the API calls I am making is bigger on the new server (I am reading the old
one and writing to the new one).

 

It's on my list of things to keep in mind.

 

Cheers and thank again!

Ben

www.softwaretoolhouse.com

 

From: Ben Chernys [mailto:ben.cher...@softwaretoolhouse.com] 
Sent: August-19-15 22:08
To: 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG'
Subject: RE: ARERR 9755 - any experience with this error?

 

Thanks Fred,

 

I see a whack of the same ones under bmc and a slightly more modern one
under /lic64.  So, I'll give it a test tomorrow (It's 22:00 here now J)

 

However, no files were changed and this only recently started happening J

 

root@cent_9 bmc]# ls -l $x

-rwxrwxr-x. 1 ARS ARS 426010 Jan 25  2013 ./ARSystem/bin/libfreebl3.so

-rwxrwxr-x. 1 ARS ARS 426010 Jan 25  2013
./ARSystem/plugins/ardbcldap/linux/libfreebl3.so

-rwxrwxr-x. 1 ARS ARS 426010 Jan 25  2013
./ARSystem/plugins/arealdap/linux/libfreebl3.so

-rwxrwxr-x. 1 ARS ARS 426010 Jan 25  2013
./ARSystem/plugins/atriumsso/linux/libfreebl3.so

-rwxrwxr-x. 1 ARS ARS 426010 Jan 25  2013
./ARSystem/plugins/ssoldap/linux/libfreebl3.so

lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 25 Dec 23  2014 /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so -
../../lib64/libfreebl3.so

[root@cent_9 bmc]# ls -l /lib64/libfreebl3.so

-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 480288 Nov 18  2014 /lib64/libfreebl3.so

 

I'll post the response tomorrow.

 

Thanks again,

Ben

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W
Sent: August-19-15 18:43
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARERR 9755 - any experience with this error?

 

** 

Not sure if this is your issue..  When I was testing 8.1 on CentOS I had an
issue where the libfreebl3.so from BMC (in the bin directory) was from an
older version and that caused the system not to start.

I renamed that file so the arserverd process would find the one in the
system library folder instead and that solved my issue.

 

Fred

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Ben Chernys
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 10:26 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: ARERR 9755 - any experience with this error?

 

** 

Hi Folks,

 

Just received the following error even through a process restart and a
server restart:

 

9755

Error

 

Error encountered while initializing (Initialization routine) the shared
library.

On server startup, an initialization routine runs for all shared extension
libraries that are loaded.

The initialization routine returned an error, and the shared library was
unloaded from memory.

The server functions, but any functionality associated with the shared
library is unavailable. To

resolve the problem, check the implementation of the routine and make any
necessary corrections.

 

Server Cent OS 2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.x86_64

DB  Oracle 11.2.0

ARS/ITSM

8.1.0 (unpatched)

 

Any help would be appreciated.  Especially how to check the implementation
and make any necessary corrections J

 

The server doesn't function altogether well either J  I can do simple
queries but cannot pick up the a bunch of Schema info real fast.  That puts
it out altogether it would seem.  I'd hate to go back to a very old snapshot
J

 

It is a host that was replicated from a running system and then had a host
name change - which was not altogether successful but was working enough to
do writes and set create Archive forms.

 

Cheers

Ben Chernys

www.softwaretoolhouse.com

 

 

  _  

 


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Error: Validation of rules failed.

2015-08-20 Thread Reshma Shetty
Hello Jojo,

Below fields mapped in 'Personal Computer Update' are throwing errors as these 
columns are not defined in table 'dbo.TI_vwAMSSync'

tiPerHostMAC
tiPerWLNetAZ
tiPerWRNetAZ
tiPerDeviceType
tiPerHlthState

Thanks,
Reshma

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: Error: Validation of rules failed.

2015-08-20 Thread reshetty
Hello Jojo,

Below fields mapped in 'Personal Computer Update' are throwing errors as
these columns are not defined in table 'dbo.TI_vwAMSSync'

tiPerHostMAC
tiPerWLNetAZ
tiPerWRNetAZ
tiPerDeviceType
tiPerHlthState

Thanks,
Reshma 



--
View this message in context: 
http://ars-action-request-system.1.n7.nabble.com/Error-Validation-of-rules-failed-tp122632p122659.html
Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: Error: Validation of rules failed.

2015-08-20 Thread reshetty
Hello Jojo,

Below fields mapped in 'Personal Computer Update' are throwing errors as
these columns are not defined in table 'dbo.TI_vwAMSSync'

tiPerHostMAC
tiPerWLNetAZ
tiPerWRNetAZ
tiPerDeviceType
tiPerHlthState

Thanks,
Reshma 



--
View this message in context: 
http://ars-action-request-system.1.n7.nabble.com/Error-Validation-of-rules-failed-tp122632p122660.html
Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: Thanks for everything...

2015-08-20 Thread LJ LongWing
Good luck in your future endeavors, wherever they take you.
On Aug 20, 2015 8:01 PM, Larry Robinson n...@ncsu.edu wrote:

 **
 Dear ARSlist,

 The time has come for me to offer you my thanks and to say farewell. NC
 State university has completed it's transition from BMC ARS to ServiceNow.
 I was part of the implementation and support team for ServiceNow and I am
 now retired, so my participation in the ARSlist, such as it was, will be
 ending soon.

 After 15+ years of Remedy system design, development and support
 activities, I am thoroughly convinced that I could not have done my job as
 effectively as I did without the help of the contributors to this list. As
 others have observed, this list is special in it's members unselfishness
 and willingness to devote their professional and personal time help other.
 For this, I am extremely grateful.

 Wishing you all the best!
 Larry Robinson

 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Thanks for everything...

2015-08-20 Thread Larry Robinson
Dear ARSlist,

The time has come for me to offer you my thanks and to say farewell. NC
State university has completed it's transition from BMC ARS to ServiceNow.
I was part of the implementation and support team for ServiceNow and I am
now retired, so my participation in the ARSlist, such as it was, will be
ending soon.

After 15+ years of Remedy system design, development and support
activities, I am thoroughly convinced that I could not have done my job as
effectively as I did without the help of the contributors to this list. As
others have observed, this list is special in it's members unselfishness
and willingness to devote their professional and personal time help other.
For this, I am extremely grateful.

Wishing you all the best!
Larry Robinson

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Application Object Template

2015-08-20 Thread Kemes, Lisa A DLA CTR INFORMATION OPERATIONS
I created an AOT and added an INC Template to it.  The AOT is connection to a 
PDT which is connected to an SRD.

I want to change the AOT and have another INC Template attached to it.  I've 
made the SRD Offline, but the select button is still greyed out.

Is this normal?  Once you add a template to an AOT you cannot change it?

Lisa Kemes
Remedy Consultant
Dev Technology Group
DLA Office: (717) 770-6437
Cell Phone: (717) 602-9460
lisa.ke...@devtechnology.com

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: ARS 8.0. RedHat 5 = 6 migration

2015-08-20 Thread Rick Cook
Terry, I read the KBs on that.  There's a fairly quick and easy workaround.

Rick
On Aug 20, 2015 6:48 AM, Terry Bootsma tboot...@objectpath.com wrote:

 ** 
 We had some issues with Java 8 on ITSM 8.1.01 with Web reporting not
 working in the midtier.  We had to go back to Java 7 on our midtiers.

 Terry


 --
 *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *frex popo
 *Sent:* August-20-15 2:39 AM
 *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 *Subject:* Re: ARS 8.0. RedHat 5 = 6 migration

 **
 Thanks Shafkat/Jason.
 I will have to reconsider v8 and may be install v7 instead or stick with
 v6​

 On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Jason Miller jason.mil...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 **
 Yeah, I agree. I am thinking with ARS/ITSM 8.x that Java 7 is the safe
 bet. If you were looking at ARS/ITSM 9 then I would say give Java 8 serious
 consideration.

 Jason

 On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Shafqat Ayaz shafq...@yahoo.com wrote:

 **
 Hi
 I had major problems with Java 8. After talking to BMC Support I had to
 go back to v6. I don't know if this has been fixed in the meantime.



 *Shafqat Ayaz*


 --
 *From:* frex popo frexpo...@gmail.com
 *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 *Sent:* Wednesday, August 19, 2015 11:11 AM
 *Subject:* Re: ARS 8.0. RedHat 5 = 6 migration

 **
 Thanks Jason
 I checked the Knowlege Base and saw few issues with Java8 and ARS8.1 and
 other issues but nothing related to ARS8.0...So still investigating.

 Thanks​



 On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Jason Miller jason.mil...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 **
 I remember seeing something in the past about Java 8 and ARS and/or ITSM
 8.x incompatibility. Is java 8 listed on the comparability matrix for
 Remedy 8?

 It may have been addressed in an update but wanted give a heads up. I
 don't remember the exact details. It is either mentioned her on the list or
 the BMC Communities (well and kb.bmc.com probably).

 Jason

 On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:38 PM, frex popo frexpo...@gmail.com wrote:

 **
 ​We are migrating ARS/ITSM 8.0 OS from Linux RedHat5 to Linux 6 and all
 the rest stays the same, apart from Java We are planning on
 installing Java v8 instead of the current version Java v6. Anyone
 encounters some problems with having ARS/ITSM 8.0 running Java v8?

 Best Regards
 frex
 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_


 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_


 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_


 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_


 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_


 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_
 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: High volume email inbox

2015-08-20 Thread Lippincott, Levi (OMA-GIS)
John,

So we do a couple of things.

In our Corporate environment we are running Exchange 2013 with POP disabled. 
The only available protocol to use was IMAP but in the version of Exchange 2013 
that we have Microsoft actually changed the IMAP protocol slightly and it was 
causing our inbound submissions to be void of images and if it was mixed 
message format only certain parts would come through. To get around this we 
setup our own hMail email server on a separate Tomcat server and we setup a 
local remedy domain. To handle routing we had our Exchange admins setup MX 
records with our local domain to the IP of the Tomcat server. This allowed us 
to connect using IMAP or POP free from any of the Exchange restrictions. We 
still use our corporate relay for outbound.

All that being said we are running 8.1.00 currently, with plans in the upcoming 
weeks to upgrade to 8.1.02. We are a multi-tenancy environment with 300+ 
Companies.

All of our ticket updates are standardized, we require the full ticket number 
to be at the end of the subject line. All of those “bad” emails in my below 
examples were when someone tried to update a ticket improperly.

Our inbound ticket creation is not that standardized. The only real requirement 
we have is that if the email is to generate a ticket it cannot have RE: at the 
beginning of the Subject line and the email address they are sending to has to 
be the only thing in the To field, any other email addresses need to be in the 
CC or BCC fields.

When we have a department approach us for auto creation we have them work with 
the Exchange administrators to setup a mailbox that forwards on the server side 
to our processing mailbox. Then they give us the email address that was created 
and then I go into the RBE:Console form and setup the creation rules that we 
work with this department on. Such as, it goes to this group with a specific 
categorization. After I configure the rule I go to the RBE:Rule form, find what 
I just created, then I change the Company name I created it under to the Global 
designator. From there I pull up the RBE:Action form, find the rule I just 
created, and then I remove the authValidate User/auth from the string to 
allow anyone that sends properly to create a ticket.

One of these days I am going to overlay or build custom workflow that will do 
those RBE:Rule and RBE:Action steps for me since it is the standard we use.

We have custom workflow that if they are non-validated user then it will create 
the ticket with the Customer information “ENTER VALUE” and it requires the tech 
who first works on the ticket to set the Customer name properly.

If we have a department who wants various categorizations or different group 
configurations for their emails we can do it a couple of different ways. Our 
most common is just have them setup a different mailbox for that particular 
requirement. Otherwise we can have them make it clear to their customers that 
they want specific key words in the Subject line in order for it to work.

We also overlaid the workflow that handles the attachments for the tickets and 
instead of parsing out the various images and attachments and then putting them 
on the ticket we simply attach the full email from the Alternate Attachments 
tab on the AR System Email Messages form. By doing this it keeps full integrity 
of the email intact and has been better for audits.

I hope that helped answer your question and didn’t just waste your time 
blasting you with a bunch of information you didn’t need.

Levi Lippincott / Remedy Administrator

+1 402 561 7014 office
+1 402 321 5421 mobile
levi.lippinc...@interpublic.commailto:levi.lippinc...@interpublic.com

Interpublic Group  6825 Pine Street, Omaha, NE 68106

Talent is a Gift; But Character is a Choice. -Matt Grotewold-

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of John Sundberg
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:15 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: High volume email inbox

**
Levi,

Great stuff.

So - in general it seems as if the incoming mail is pretty highly standardized 
and is reasonable to automate (in terms of updating tickets ???)

Would you say you use the inbox for a “variety” of “routes” — or do you have 
different email accounts for different functions?

(I am just trying to get my head around using email for automation)


-John





On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Lippincott, Levi (OMA-GIS) 
levi.lippinc...@interpublic.commailto:levi.lippinc...@interpublic.com wrote:
**
John,

I don’t know if we have a “high-volume” but I just ran a report and this is 
what I show over the past 2 weeks, excluding weekends.

We averaged 2,454 emails per day with our lowest day being 1,806 and our 
highest being 2,998.

For “good” emails we averaged 95.6% with our lowest being 94.3% and our highest 
being 97.0%.

The only real “non-good” types of emails we have are when someone is trying to 
update a specific ticket with a 

Re: High volume email inbox

2015-08-20 Thread John Sundberg
Levi,

Great stuff.

As a point of interest - my brother works for one of those 300+ companies.
:)

Sounds like you have a good strategy and it is working well for you.

Do you find the rules/actions able to cover your needs fairly well - or do
you feel you need to do a fair amount of filter work in addition?

Also - one last question … are people asking for email boxes because they
have some system that is creating the emails — or - are they finding that
it is the easiest way for people to create “incidents” that may have some
sort of special attributes to them (vs just a generic incident)???



-John







On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Lippincott, Levi (OMA-GIS) 
levi.lippinc...@interpublic.com wrote:

 **

 John,



 So we do a couple of things.



 In our Corporate environment we are running Exchange 2013 with POP
 disabled. The only available protocol to use was IMAP but in the version of
 Exchange 2013 that we have Microsoft actually changed the IMAP protocol
 slightly and it was causing our inbound submissions to be void of images
 and if it was mixed message format only certain parts would come through.
 To get around this we setup our own hMail email server on a separate Tomcat
 server and we setup a local remedy domain. To handle routing we had our
 Exchange admins setup MX records with our local domain to the IP of the
 Tomcat server. This allowed us to connect using IMAP or POP free from any
 of the Exchange restrictions. We still use our corporate relay for outbound.



 All that being said we are running 8.1.00 currently, with plans in the
 upcoming weeks to upgrade to 8.1.02. We are a multi-tenancy environment
 with 300+ Companies.



 All of our ticket updates are standardized, we require the full ticket
 number to be at the end of the subject line. All of those “bad” emails in
 my below examples were when someone tried to update a ticket improperly.



 Our inbound ticket creation is not that standardized. The only real
 requirement we have is that if the email is to generate a ticket it cannot
 have RE: at the beginning of the Subject line and the email address they
 are sending to has to be the only thing in the To field, any other email
 addresses need to be in the CC or BCC fields.



 When we have a department approach us for auto creation we have them work
 with the Exchange administrators to setup a mailbox that forwards on the
 server side to our processing mailbox. Then they give us the email address
 that was created and then I go into the RBE:Console form and setup the
 creation rules that we work with this department on. Such as, it goes to
 this group with a specific categorization. After I configure the rule I go
 to the RBE:Rule form, find what I just created, then I change the Company
 name I created it under to the Global designator. From there I pull up the
 RBE:Action form, find the rule I just created, and then I remove the
 authValidate User/auth from the string to allow anyone that sends
 properly to create a ticket.



 One of these days I am going to overlay or build custom workflow that will
 do those RBE:Rule and RBE:Action steps for me since it is the standard we
 use.



 We have custom workflow that if they are non-validated user then it will
 create the ticket with the Customer information “ENTER VALUE” and it
 requires the tech who first works on the ticket to set the Customer name
 properly.



 If we have a department who wants various categorizations or different
 group configurations for their emails we can do it a couple of different
 ways. Our most common is just have them setup a different mailbox for that
 particular requirement. Otherwise we can have them make it clear to their
 customers that they want specific key words in the Subject line in order
 for it to work.



 We also overlaid the workflow that handles the attachments for the tickets
 and instead of parsing out the various images and attachments and then
 putting them on the ticket we simply attach the full email from the
 Alternate Attachments tab on the AR System Email Messages form. By doing
 this it keeps full integrity of the email intact and has been better for
 audits.



 I hope that helped answer your question and didn’t just waste your time
 blasting you with a bunch of information you didn’t need.



 *Levi Lippincott / *Remedy Administrator



 +1 402 561 7014 office

 +1 402 321 5421 mobile

 levi.lippinc...@interpublic.com



 *Interpublic Group*  6825 Pine Street, Omaha, NE 68106



 *Talent is a Gift; But Character is a Choice. -Matt Grotewold-*



 *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *John Sundberg
 *Sent:* Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:15 PM
 *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 *Subject:* Re: High volume email inbox



 **

 Levi,



 Great stuff.



 So - in general it seems as if the incoming mail is pretty highly
 standardized and is reasonable to automate (in terms of updating tickets
 ???)



 Would you say 

Re: ARS 8.0. RedHat 5 = 6 migration

2015-08-20 Thread Terry Bootsma
We had some issues with Java 8 on ITSM 8.1.01 with Web reporting not working in 
the midtier.  We had to go back to Java 7 on our midtiers.
 
Terry
 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of frex popo
Sent: August-20-15 2:39 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 8.0. RedHat 5 = 6 migration


** 
Thanks Shafkat/Jason.
I will have to reconsider v8 and may be install v7 instead or stick with v6​

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Jason Miller jason.mil...@gmail.com wrote:


** 
Yeah, I agree. I am thinking with ARS/ITSM 8.x that Java 7 is the safe bet. If 
you were looking at ARS/ITSM 9 then I would say give Java 8 serious 
consideration. 

Jason

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Shafqat Ayaz shafq...@yahoo.com wrote:


** 
Hi
I had major problems with Java 8. After talking to BMC Support I had to go back 
to v6. I don't know if this has been fixed in the meantime.
 


Shafqat Ayaz 




  _  

From: frex popo frexpo...@gmail.com
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: ARS 8.0. RedHat 5 = 6 migration


** 
Thanks Jason
I checked the Knowlege Base and saw few issues with Java8 and ARS8.1 and other 
issues but nothing related to ARS8.0...So still investigating.

Thanks​



On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Jason Miller jason.mil...@gmail.com wrote:


** 
I remember seeing something in the past about Java 8 and ARS and/or ITSM 8.x 
incompatibility. Is java 8 listed on the comparability matrix for Remedy 8? 

It may have been addressed in an update but wanted give a heads up. I don't 
remember the exact details. It is either mentioned her on the list or the BMC 
Communities (well and kb.bmc.com http://kb.bmc.com/  probably). 

Jason

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:38 PM, frex popo frexpo...@gmail.com wrote:


** 
​We are migrating ARS/ITSM 8.0 OS from Linux RedHat5 to Linux 6 and all the 
rest stays the same, apart from Java We are planning on installing Java v8 
instead of the current version Java v6. Anyone encounters some problems with 
having ARS/ITSM 8.0 running Java v8?

Best Regards
frex
_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ 


_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ 


_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_



_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_


_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ 


_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ 

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Turning off general ticket notifications from ITSM modules during a transaction..

2015-08-20 Thread Joe D'Souza
Is there a flag somewhere on the IM, CM, etc. modules that can be set during
the transaction to not send out a notification, overriding the settings for
notifications for that ticket? Due to the nature of one of my requirement, I
would know if a notification must be or shouldn't be sent only during
update.

 

The problem is I do want the OTB notifications to happen as they should, but
I need the ability to programmatically turn it off for a certain transaction
if it meets a particular criteria - a criteria that that mostly depends on
custom fields that will be created.

 

I would prefer not to touch the OTB filters / workflow that sends those
notifications but rather override what is set by that workflow by setting a
value into a OTB field that signals no notifications action for that
particular transaction.

 

Is there an OTB field that might be able to control that?

 

Joe


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: High volume email inbox

2015-08-20 Thread Lippincott, Levi (OMA-GIS)
John,

That’s cool about your brother. Hopefully he doesn’t think the system we have 
sucks. ☺

We had to do a little bit of filter work but not very much. It was mainly for 
fields that we had made required that were not out of the box. For instance we 
require all 3 Operational  Product Categorizations as well as Product Name  
Manufacturer. I believe I had to add them to the list of fields to push to, 
that was almost a year ago so that is a little fuzzy in my memory though. I 
remember it being relatively simple though once I had ran some Filter logs of 
an inbound email.

As far as the people asking for email boxes. It is a little bit of both. We 
have some systems that are not able to integrate, or the addons that would 
allow them to integrate the company doesn’t want to pay for, so they generate 
an email. There are also departments, like SAP, that have broken their labor up 
into various departments and each department wants their users to submit 
requests directly to them so they can be classified right away and skip any 
delays in triage that the Help Desk would do.

I do have to say though we have started working with our Sharepoint team more 
and more using both the Web Services and the RESTful API to build some forms 
people could go to and fill out and it can generate a ticket for them. Doing it 
this way has allowed people to get much more granular and specific on their 
issue and the ticket is able to be better classified from the outset saving 
time for the Help Desk. As those forms are used more and more it lowers the 
volume of email we are getting.

Levi Lippincott / Remedy Administrator

+1 402 561 7014 office
+1 402 321 5421 mobile
levi.lippinc...@interpublic.commailto:levi.lippinc...@interpublic.com

Interpublic Group  6825 Pine Street, Omaha, NE 68106

Talent is a Gift; But Character is a Choice. -Matt Grotewold-

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of John Sundberg
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 9:49 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: High volume email inbox

**
Levi,

Great stuff.

As a point of interest - my brother works for one of those 300+ companies. :)

Sounds like you have a good strategy and it is working well for you.

Do you find the rules/actions able to cover your needs fairly well - or do you 
feel you need to do a fair amount of filter work in addition?

Also - one last question … are people asking for email boxes because they have 
some system that is creating the emails — or - are they finding that it is the 
easiest way for people to create “incidents” that may have some sort of special 
attributes to them (vs just a generic incident)???



-John







On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Lippincott, Levi (OMA-GIS) 
levi.lippinc...@interpublic.commailto:levi.lippinc...@interpublic.com wrote:
**
John,

So we do a couple of things.

In our Corporate environment we are running Exchange 2013 with POP disabled. 
The only available protocol to use was IMAP but in the version of Exchange 2013 
that we have Microsoft actually changed the IMAP protocol slightly and it was 
causing our inbound submissions to be void of images and if it was mixed 
message format only certain parts would come through. To get around this we 
setup our own hMail email server on a separate Tomcat server and we setup a 
local remedy domain. To handle routing we had our Exchange admins setup MX 
records with our local domain to the IP of the Tomcat server. This allowed us 
to connect using IMAP or POP free from any of the Exchange restrictions. We 
still use our corporate relay for outbound.

All that being said we are running 8.1.00 currently, with plans in the upcoming 
weeks to upgrade to 8.1.02. We are a multi-tenancy environment with 300+ 
Companies.

All of our ticket updates are standardized, we require the full ticket number 
to be at the end of the subject line. All of those “bad” emails in my below 
examples were when someone tried to update a ticket improperly.

Our inbound ticket creation is not that standardized. The only real requirement 
we have is that if the email is to generate a ticket it cannot have RE: at the 
beginning of the Subject line and the email address they are sending to has to 
be the only thing in the To field, any other email addresses need to be in the 
CC or BCC fields.

When we have a department approach us for auto creation we have them work with 
the Exchange administrators to setup a mailbox that forwards on the server side 
to our processing mailbox. Then they give us the email address that was created 
and then I go into the RBE:Console form and setup the creation rules that we 
work with this department on. Such as, it goes to this group with a specific 
categorization. After I configure the rule I go to the RBE:Rule form, find what 
I just created, then I change the Company name I created it under to the Global 
designator. From there I pull up the RBE:Action form, find the rule I just 

Re: Application Object Template

2015-08-20 Thread Roger Justice

Yes this normal. You will need to create a new AOT and then replace the 
existing one with the new one.
 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Kemes, Lisa A DLA CTR INFORMATION OPERATIONS lisa.kemes@dla.mil
To: arslist arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thu, Aug 20, 2015 2:54 pm
Subject: Application Object Template


I created an AOT and added an INC Template to it.  The AOT is connection to a
PDT which is connected to an SRD.

I want to change the AOT and have another
INC Template attached to it.  I've made the SRD Offline, but the select button
is still greyed out.

Is this normal?  Once you add a template to an AOT you
cannot change it?

Lisa Kemes
Remedy Consultant
Dev Technology Group
DLA
Office: (717) 770-6437
Cell Phone: (717)
602-9460
lisa.ke...@devtechnology.com

___
UNSUBSCRIBE
or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have
been for 20 years

 

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: Application Object Template

2015-08-20 Thread Kemes, Lisa A DLA CTR INFORMATION OPERATIONS
OK, thanks everyone!


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Tauf Chowdhury
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 3:05 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Application Object Template

It's been a while but I'm pretty sure you'll need to create a new AOT. 

Sent from my iPhone

 On Aug 20, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Kemes, Lisa A DLA CTR INFORMATION OPERATIONS 
 lisa.kemes@dla.mil wrote:
 
 I created an AOT and added an INC Template to it.  The AOT is connection to a 
 PDT which is connected to an SRD.
 
 I want to change the AOT and have another INC Template attached to it.  I've 
 made the SRD Offline, but the select button is still greyed out.
 
 Is this normal?  Once you add a template to an AOT you cannot change it?
 
 Lisa Kemes
 Remedy Consultant
 Dev Technology Group
 DLA Office: (717) 770-6437
 Cell Phone: (717) 602-9460
 lisa.ke...@devtechnology.com
 
 __
 _ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org 
 Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Where the Answers 
Are, and have been for 20 years

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: Communicating between ARS Servers 7.6.04 and 8.1.2 using WSDL...

2015-08-20 Thread Joe D'Souza
Thanks Fred,

 

I don't think size of XML will be an issue with this site. Besides it is
only a temporary solution until all the groups are onboard the new version.

 

All views appreciated.

 

Thanks much. If anyone has anything more to share, please feel free.

 

Cheers

 

Joe

 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 6:25 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Communicating between ARS Servers 7.6.04 and 8.1.2 using
WSDL...

 

There should not be any changes in there.

 

As a side note.  It is the complexity of the XML parsing that will affect
MidTier more than the size.  I had a case with an external app calling one
of my services more than 50 times in a couple of hours pushing over 3.6 Meg
per XML payload.  MidTier 7.6.04 didn't have a problem.

 

Fred

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 11:41 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Communicating between ARS Servers 7.6.04 and 8.1.2 using
WSDL...

 

** 

This should not change much as the XSD's structure hasn't changed since
7.1.0, but I made a small error when stating the versions we would need to
design a bidirectional communication between. It is 7.6.0 to 8.1.2 NOT 7.6.4
to 8.1.2.

 

Any changes in the XSD's between these??

 

Joe

 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Terry Bootsma
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 8:14 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Communicating between ARS Servers 7.6.04 and 8.1.2 using
WSDL...

 

Just a note Joe.  Depending upon the amount of data and the frequency of the
synchronization, you may want to consider another technology other than web
services.  I was doing some load testing earlier this year and found that
the mid-tier didn't scale very well when extracting large amounts of data
via a programattic interface.  This makes sense since all the parsing of
XML/SOAP that the midtier has to do when converting/unconverting the data.
Note, that this was not a Remedy ARSystem bottleneck, but the midtier.I
worked with BMC support on this and it is something that they hope to fix in
Remedy 9.  :-) 

 

Terry

 

 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W
Sent: August-17-15 3:48 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Communicating between ARS Servers 7.6.04 and 8.1.2 using
WSDL...

** 

It had to do with the change in the 7.1 patch where the namespace structure
changed.  I think prior to the 7.1 patch there was no namespace and after
the patch there was.

 

Fred

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 2:04 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Communicating between ARS Servers 7.6.04 and 8.1.2 using
WSDL...

 

** 

Sally,

 

Thanks for your reply. From what I recollect (very vaguely) it wasn't as
much to do with code change inside the AR layer as much it had to do with
the structure of the WSDL's itself having changed with some new constructs
added, that were not understood by the other system. I wish I had more
details to share about that problem.

 

But I do remember BMC Support calling it as a known limitation between those
two versions saying that the WSDL would need to be manually tweaked for it
to work.

 

Joe

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Ludwig, Sally
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 2:45 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Communicating between ARS Servers 7.6.04 and 8.1.2 using
WSDL...

 

Hi Joe,

 

There was a significant code change for web services between 6.3 and 7.6.04
which would have generated the problems you encountered.To be specific,
it was at the 7.0.1 patch 004 level.   At that point, all components ( Dev
Studio, Midtier and AR server)  needed to be at 7.0.1 patch 004 or better).
There has not been any major changes between 7.6.04 and 8.1.02, so they
should work in either direction.  

 

Best regards

Sally Ludwig

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 1:40 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Communicating between ARS Servers 7.6.04 and 8.1.2 using WSDL...
Importance: High

 

** 

On paper - the easy answer is this should work.

 

However a few years ago (maybe 3 years ago) I was attempting to prototype
communication between a 7.6.04 system and a 6.3 system, something failed, of
which I do not recall details. It had something to do with one system not
recognizing certain constructs in the WSDL in the other system. I am
inclined to think it was the 6.3 system that could not understand the 7.6.04
WSDL completely.

 


Re: Application Object Template

2015-08-20 Thread Tauf Chowdhury
It's been a while but I'm pretty sure you'll need to create a new AOT. 

Sent from my iPhone

 On Aug 20, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Kemes, Lisa A DLA CTR INFORMATION OPERATIONS 
 lisa.kemes@dla.mil wrote:
 
 I created an AOT and added an INC Template to it.  The AOT is connection to a 
 PDT which is connected to an SRD.
 
 I want to change the AOT and have another INC Template attached to it.  I've 
 made the SRD Offline, but the select button is still greyed out.
 
 Is this normal?  Once you add a template to an AOT you cannot change it?
 
 Lisa Kemes
 Remedy Consultant
 Dev Technology Group
 DLA Office: (717) 770-6437
 Cell Phone: (717) 602-9460
 lisa.ke...@devtechnology.com
 
 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: Remedy 9 PROCESS command

2015-08-20 Thread Grooms, Frederick W
I’m always leery of running a server side command from an AL.  I now do the 
following

Create a SERVICE type filter to run the command.
Call the Filter from the AL with the Service action (and in here you can return 
the values you want)

Fred


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of jham36
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 4:44 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Remedy 9 PROCESS command

**
Hello all,

A few months ago I posted an issue about running psexec from Remedy and got 
some good help.  I ended up using paexec which is able to get the console 
output from the remote process and return it directly into remedy.
I am currently on ARS 7.5 and upgrading to ARS 9 and doing some testing on the 
new servers.  What I have is an Active Link doing a set fields $PROCESS$ 
@@:$StatusCommand$ $Test Set Name$
I am getting values from fields on the form to use in the Process command.  The 
path to paexec.exe plus parameters and the remote exe name and parameters.

D:\QCInt\PAExec\paexec.exe \\servernamefile:///\\servername -u domain\User -p 
Password C:\User\QCInt\RunTestSet\RunTestSet.exe -ss Demo_Process

I didn't have to call cmd.exe or comspec or anything special.

This works fine with my ARS 7.5 system and I get the return value into Remedy.
On my new ARS 9 system, the remote process is executed, but I do not get the 
return value and the paexec process as well as the remote temporary paexec 
service do not exit.
When I run the same command from a command line on the new remedy server, it 
works just fine.
It seems that something has changed in how the $PROCESS$ command works.

Any ideas?

Thanks,
James



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Remedy 9 PROCESS command

2015-08-20 Thread jham36
Hello all,

A few months ago I posted an issue about running psexec from Remedy and got 
some good help.  I ended up using paexec which is able to get the console 
output from the remote process and return it directly into remedy.
I am currently on ARS 7.5 and upgrading to ARS 9 and doing some testing on 
the new servers.  What I have is an Active Link doing a set fields 
$PROCESS$ @@:$StatusCommand$ $Test Set Name$
I am getting values from fields on the form to use in the Process command. 
 The path to paexec.exe plus parameters and the remote exe name and 
parameters.

D:\QCInt\PAExec\paexec.exe \\servername -u domain\User -p Password 
C:\User\QCInt\RunTestSet\RunTestSet.exe -ss Demo_Process

I didn't have to call cmd.exe or comspec or anything special.

This works fine with my ARS 7.5 system and I get the return value into 
Remedy.
On my new ARS 9 system, the remote process is executed, but I do not get 
the return value and the paexec process as well as the remote temporary 
paexec service do not exit.
When I run the same command from a command line on the new remedy server, 
it works just fine.
It seems that something has changed in how the $PROCESS$ command works.

Any ideas?

Thanks,
James

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years