, April 20, 2012 5:22 PM
*Newsgroups:* public.remedy.arsystem.general
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: Setting the 112 field with a flow
**
Sounds like a bug to me too – after all, the row level access control
should be enforced at the server, not through the clients
Dave
Hi,
I'm dynamically setting permission to the record. User fires a workflow and
sets the 112 field with the custom role name.
In my application role name = group name. So I'm able to see that entry in
database as: ;-1234567890;
Also I can see it in the 112 field as : Role Name
Request ID has
Forgot the environment:
ARS 7.603
Midtier: 7.6.03
2012/4/20 Marek B. mare...@gmail.com
Hi,
I'm dynamically setting permission to the record. User fires a workflow
and sets the 112 field with the custom role name.
In my application role name = group name. So I'm able to see that entry
Subject: Setting the 112 field with a flow
** Hi,
I'm dynamically setting permission to the record. User fires a workflow and
sets the 112 field with the custom role name.
In my application role name = group name. So I'm able to see that entry in
database as: ;-1234567890;
Also I can see
discussion list(ARSList)
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
04/20/2012 09:47 AM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc
Subject
Setting the 112 field with a flow
** Hi,
I'm dynamically setting permission to the record. User fires a workflow
and sets the 112 field with the custom role
Did you recache the mid tier after creating that group and role?
Joe
From: Marek B.
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 9:47 AM
Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Setting the 112 field with a flow
** Hi,
I'm dynamically setting permission to the record
this e-mail
Joe Martin D'Souza jdso...@shyle.net
Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
04/20/2012 03:57 PM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc
Subject
Re: Setting the 112 field with a flow
**
Did you recache the mid
: public.remedy.arsystem.general
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Setting the 112 field with a flow
**
On mine yes I even deleted Tomcats tempoary cache files then restarted Tomcat
and cleared out my PC cache. I could see other changes to the form so the
recache worked
- SaaS - On Premise
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe Martin D'Souza
Sent: 20 April 2012 21:51
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Setting the 112 field with a flow
**
If it works on the WUT and not on the web and if you
: Setting the 112 field with a flow
**
Sounds like a bug to me too – after all, the row level access control should be
enforced at the server, not through the clients
Dave
David Sanders
Solution Architect
Enterprise Service Suite @ Work / e-ServiceSuite
tel +44 1494 468980
mobile +44
Hi All - I have created a new Group. What do I have to do to get the
MidTier client to see this new group in the 112 field? I have flushed
the cache, logged out, and waited about 20 mins.
Christie Pargeter
Legacy Health
IS - Programming
SR Technical Analyst
**
Hi everybody,I created on a form the 112 field and populated it with the groups I want to display the records.But when I try to access the form from a user belonging to a group not in the list, all the records are still visible.Can you help me please? __20060125___This
**
Check the permissions on Field ID 1.It may say Public which mean all groups have access. Set the permission of field ID 1 to Assigned Group to only allow the groups in 112 access.On 10/29/06,
Gianluca Nieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
**
Hi everybody,I created on a form the 112 field
13 matches
Mail list logo
