Hi Stefan,
If we do something like this we have to start by removing abs_xsec_agenda.
There's no good way to mold the Zeeman effect into fitting with it.
I will inline the rest.
Den mån 1 feb. 2021 kl 17:29 skrev Stefan Buehler <
stefan.bueh...@uni-hamburg.de>:
> Hej Richard,
>
> to me the
Hej Richard,
to me the interesting point is that the specific inputs could be handled
where the “Add..Habit” happens. In the case of absorption, a lot of
difficulty comes from the dichotomy between the species tags and the
methods that have to be added to the absorption agenda to actually do
Simon, Stefan,
It seems to me that this is a proposal of using a modern "void *"
list/vector with some strict interface. Have I misunderstood something
here? I mean you might implement it with virtual classes, std::variant, or
some other reinterpreting interface but that seems about it.
I am
Dear Simon,
The handling of the constant data is completely up to the
implementation of the specific scatterers.
For the ScatteringParticle class, for example, this is provided when
the object is constructed.
So when the ARTS user calls:
scattering_speciesAddScatteringHabit(...)
an object
ass.
From: Stefan Buehler
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 12:07:56 PM
To: Simon Pfreundschuh
Cc: ARTS Developers List
Subject: Re: Simon plans for scattering properties
Dear Simon,
how will you manage communication? I’m asking because there is a
related issue in computing absorpt
of Stefan
Buehler
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 8:42:21 AM
To: Simon Pfreundschuh
Cc: ARTS Developers List
Subject: Re: Simon plans for scattering properties
Hej Simon,
can you help me understand it then, please? I do want to find the best
solution, not necessarily the quickest. (But simplicity
on behalf of Stefan Buehler
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 8:42:21 AM
To: Simon Pfreundschuh
Cc: ARTS Developers List
Subject: Re: Simon plans for scattering properties
Hej Simon,
can you help me understand it then, please? I do want to find the best
solution, not necessarily the quickest
-boun...@mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de
on behalf of Stefan
Buehler
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 9:36:33 AM
To: ARTS Developers List
Subject: Simon plans for scattering properties
Dear all,
one thing I took home from the developer meeting on Friday is that I
would like to better understand Simon’s
From: Stefan Buehler
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 5:02:28 PM
To: Simon Pfreundschuh
Cc: ARTS Developers List
Subject: Re: Simon plans for scattering properties
Dear Simon,
thanks for the summary!
I think I understand more or less how this works now. A bit
unfortunate
that so much
cut this short.
/s
From: Stefan Buehler
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 5:02:28 PM
To: Simon Pfreundschuh
Cc: ARTS Developers List
Subject: Re: Simon plans for scattering properties
Dear Simon,
thanks for the summary!
I think I understand more or less how
...@mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de
on behalf of Stefan
Buehler
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 9:36:33 AM
To: ARTS Developers List
Subject: Simon plans for scattering properties
Dear all,
one thing I took home from the developer meeting on Friday is that I
would like to better understand Simon’s plans
Dear all,
one thing I took home from the developer meeting on Friday is that I
would like to better understand Simon’s plans for the scattering
properties. We need this to make a good decision on how to proceed with
the Rayleigh scattering (incorporate it into the existing scattering
data
12 matches
Mail list logo
