Re: [asdf-devel] question about relative pathname to point to parent directory

2010-05-26 Thread Robert Goldman
On 5/26/10 May 26 -9:35 AM, Faré wrote: > On 26 May 2010 09:18, Robert Goldman wrote: >> On 5/25/10 May 25 -11:11 AM, Faré wrote: >>> I'm not sure what you want, but try "" for current directory, ".." for up, >>> etc. >>> ".." is actually not recognized by ASDF but passed to the >>> implementatio

Re: [asdf-devel] question about relative pathname to point to parent directory

2010-05-26 Thread Faré
On 26 May 2010 09:18, Robert Goldman wrote: > On 5/25/10 May 25 -11:11 AM, Faré wrote: >> I'm not sure what you want, but try "" for current directory, ".." for up, >> etc. >> ".." is actually not recognized by ASDF but passed to the >> implementation, and from it to the OS. > > I added a test th

Re: [asdf-devel] question about relative pathname to point to parent directory

2010-05-26 Thread Faré
On 26 May 2010 09:20, Robert Goldman wrote: > On 5/25/10 May 25 -11:11 AM, Faré wrote: >> I'm not sure what you want, but try "" for current directory, ".." for up, >> etc. >> ".." is actually not recognized by ASDF but passed to the >> implementation, and from it to the OS. > > Question:  if "..

Re: [asdf-devel] question about relative pathname to point to parent directory

2010-05-26 Thread Robert Goldman
On 5/25/10 May 25 -11:11 AM, Faré wrote: > I'm not sure what you want, but try "" for current directory, ".." for up, > etc. > ".." is actually not recognized by ASDF but passed to the > implementation, and from it to the OS. Question: if ".." is handled by the OS, does that mean it may not be p

Re: [asdf-devel] question about relative pathname to point to parent directory

2010-05-26 Thread Robert Goldman
On 5/25/10 May 25 -11:11 AM, Faré wrote: > I'm not sure what you want, but try "" for current directory, ".." for up, > etc. > ".." is actually not recognized by ASDF but passed to the > implementation, and from it to the OS. I added a test that verifies that "" works as a pathname component. I

Re: [asdf-devel] question about relative pathname to point to parent directory

2010-05-25 Thread Faré
I'm not sure what you want, but try "" for current directory, ".." for up, etc. ".." is actually not recognized by ASDF but passed to the implementation, and from it to the OS. Paths are relative to the parent's pathname's directory. [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://f

[asdf-devel] question about relative pathname to point to parent directory

2010-05-25 Thread Robert Goldman
What's the right syntax for specifying a relative pathname for a module whose files should live in the parent directory instead of in a subdirectory? E.g., if I have (:module foo :components ((:file "bar") (:file "baz")) :pathname ) what goes in there if I do NOT want the files to live