On Fri, 19 Mar 2021, Faré wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 3:10 AM Andreas Davour wrote:
What more, even Xach […] updated the fallback ASDF in Quicklisp
from 2.26 to 3.2.1!
Didn't he revert that change after something broke?
Not according to the git repository of quicklisp-client.
Also, we
"Robert Goldman" écrivait:
> Didier, would you mind posting a GitLab issue for this? It's feasible,
> but I'm so overloaded right now that there's no chance I will get to
> it before I forget.
Sure!
--
¡En Seguida! -- New album: https://www.didierverna.com/records/en-seguida.php
Available
Didier, would you mind posting a GitLab issue for this? It's feasible,
but I'm so overloaded right now that there's no chance I will get to it
before I forget.
Thanks
On 19 Mar 2021, at 8:34, Didier Verna wrote:
François-René ÐVB Rideau écrivait:
Before it can be ignored, it must be
François-René ÐVB Rideau écrivait:
> Before it can be ignored, it must be defined. And so as to define it,
> its class must be defined. I suppose we could have some error class
> that it used when the class it not defined, that would only trigger an
> error at runtime if the feature is true. I'm
François-René ÐVB Rideau écrivait:
> Using git log test/test-defsystem-depends-on.script it looks like this
> is https://bugs.launchpad.net/asdf/+bug/1445638 Looking for that bug
> in git log, it was fixed in 3.1.4.5 on 2015-04-23.
I'm proceeding with the second issue in my system, and it
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Faré wrote:
Considering that SBCL upgraded to 3.1.5 in July 2015, I think you
should be pretty safe assuming that your users' ASDF is more recent
than 3.1.4.
What more, even Xach seems to have miraculously seen the light: one
months and one week ago, he updated the
"Robert Goldman" wrote:
> This one seems complex enough -- and so much trouble to make a MWE --
> that maybe you want to just change it and see if it breaks.
Yup, that's what I did locally, with recent versions of all compilers
I have. Those shipping with ASDF seem to all have 3.2.0 at
François-René ÐVB Rideau écrivait:
> What more, even Xach seems to have miraculously seen the light: one
> months and one week ago, he updated the fallback ASDF in Quicklisp
> from 2.26 to 3.2.1!
That's also what made me think I could perhaps do some clean up!
> That was the first update of
Considering that SBCL upgraded to 3.1.5 in July 2015, I think you
should be pretty safe assuming that your users' ASDF is more recent
than 3.1.4.
What more, even Xach seems to have miraculously seen the light: one
months and one week ago, he updated the fallback ASDF in Quicklisp
from 2.26 to
On 18 Mar 2021, at 11:59, Didier Verna wrote:
Hi,
I would like to remove some old workaround code from a couple of
systems, wrt to ASDF 3.1.4 bugs (see below). Is it safe to do so now,
or
are these "bugs" still lurking around?
The relevant parts are as follows:
:defsystem-depends-on
Hi,
I would like to remove some old workaround code from a couple of
systems, wrt to ASDF 3.1.4 bugs (see below). Is it safe to do so now, or
are these "bugs" still lurking around?
The relevant parts are as follows:
:defsystem-depends-on
(:net.didierverna.clon.setup/termio
#+sbcl ;;
11 matches
Mail list logo
