Re: HLASM manuals

2011-08-23 Thread robin
From: "Shane G" Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 10:32 AM Once upon a time (prior to softcopy manuals) we had a (new) manager dictate a "clean desk" policy. Might have been initiated by looking at the team I was in, who knows ... The rule was "no more than 2 manuals on anyones desk". You have

Re: HLASM manuals

2011-08-23 Thread Shane G
On Wed, Aug 24th, 2011 at 1:07 AM, David Cole wrote: > Way back in the 1960's when I first endeavored to learn "Assembler" > (a vague term, at best), I found that what generally was supplied by > one or two manuals in any other language, required at lest 5 or 6 for > Assembler! And that was 45 yea

Re: Is the PoOP too big? (was Assembler manuals)

2011-08-23 Thread Gerhard Postpischil
On 8/23/2011 5:03 PM, David Cole wrote: You still print the manuals Why? I do not print manuals, but I do have a library containing reasonably current material, and some scant MVS and OS/360 stuff. For quick references I have a CD set, which until recently was faster than going on-line. Ba

Re: Is the PoOP too big? (was Assembler manuals)

2011-08-23 Thread David Cole
At 8/23/2011 03:29 PM, Gerhard Postpischil wrote: The printed manual is getting to be unwieldy. I could see having it split into two, or possibly three, volumes: You still print the manuals Why? Dave Cole REPLY TO: dbc...@colesoft.com ColeSoft Marketing WEB PAGE: http://

Re: Is the PoOP too big? (was Assembler manuals)

2011-08-23 Thread Gerhard Postpischil
On 8/23/2011 2:14 PM, Bernd Oppolzer wrote: I believe that the PoOP should or could stay like it is, because the normal use is not as a tutorial for learning ASSEMBLER or machine architecture, but to make clear some difficulties or peculiarities of seldom used instructions, at least in my case.

Re: Is the PoOP too big? (was Assembler manuals)

2011-08-23 Thread Bernd Oppolzer
I believe that the PoOP should or could stay like it is, because the normal use is not as a tutorial for learning ASSEMBLER or machine architecture, but to make clear some difficulties or peculiarities of seldom used instructions, at least in my case. For learning ASSEMBLER, I would use the follo

Re: HLASM manuals

2011-08-23 Thread Andreas Geissbuehler
Once upon a time I opened a manual at the index or TOC page... Today I do (or wish to do) a tag search to find the best fitting JCL example, some code snippet, an illustration. Then I look at how it is built and test my understanding how it does what it is supposed to do. I take note of warnings

Size of thre Principles of Operation (PrOp)

2011-08-23 Thread john gilmore
I do not wish to single Martin Trübner out, but the notion that the PrOp is too big or notably ill-organized is, I think, ridiculous. It has met my needs as I have had to learn about a good many new and extended instructions in recent years. It is a reference, i.e., not a tutorial, publicatio

Re: HLASM manuals (errata)

2011-08-23 Thread David Cole
At 8/23/2011 11:07 AM, David Cole wrote: - And oh yes, you were asking about the return codes from OPEN... That would be in: - "z/OS MVS Diagnosis: Reference" (GA22-7588) Well... While there is some SVC return code information in the Diagnsis Reference, the main resource for this inform

Re: HLASM manuals

2011-08-23 Thread David Cole
At 8/23/2011 10:28 AM, Thomas Berg wrote: Talking about manuals for the asm programmer: where do I find the return codes from the OPEN macro (SVC 22) Hi Tom, Way back in the 1960's when I first endeavored to learn "Assembler" (a vague term, at best), I found that what generally was supplied b

Re: HLASM manuals

2011-08-23 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:28:32 +0200 Thomas Berg wrote: :>Talking about manuals for the asm programmer: where do I find the return codes from the OPEN macro (SVC 22) ? :>(I'm assembler coding impaired...) DFSMS shelf, MACROS FOR DATA SETS -- Binyamin Dissen http://www.dissensoftware.com Direc

SV: SV: HLASM manuals

2011-08-23 Thread Thomas Berg
> -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER- > l...@listserv.uga.edu] För Steve Comstock > Skickat: den 23 augusti 2011 16:39 > Till: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Ämne: Re: SV: HLASM manuals > > On 8/23/2011 8:28 AM, Thomas Berg wrote: > > Talking

Re: SV: HLASM manuals

2011-08-23 Thread Steve Comstock
On 8/23/2011 8:28 AM, Thomas Berg wrote: Talking about manuals for the asm programmer: where do I find the return codes from the OPEN macro (SVC 22) ? (I'm assembler coding impaired...) :) Regards, Thomas Berg _ Thomas Berg Specialist A M SWEDBA

SV: HLASM manuals

2011-08-23 Thread Thomas Berg
Talking about manuals for the asm programmer: where do I find the return codes from the OPEN macro (SVC 22) ? (I'm assembler coding impaired...) :) Regards, Thomas Berg _ Thomas Berg Specialist A M SWEDBANK

Re: Is the PoOP too big? (was Assembler manuals)

2011-08-23 Thread Martin Trübner
I am using Daves citation to illustrate what I wanted (in a spin off named "A new POP") Would it realy be that hard to create a text-reader-interpreter-showerhave code that would deliver this when looking for LH: For LH the first operand is treated as a 32-bit signed binary integer. or this when

AUTO: Anthony Hyde is out of the office (returning 08/29/2011)

2011-08-23 Thread Anthony Hyde
I am out of the office until 08/29/2011. I will be out of the office. If you needed to contact me call me on my cell phone and email me too. Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 18 Aug 2011 to 19 Aug 2011 (#2011-135)" sent on 8/23/2011 5:55:55 AM. Th

Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 18 Aug 2011 to 19 Aug 2011 (#2011-135)

2011-08-23 Thread Steve Comstock
On 8/23/2011 3:55 AM, Ken Brick wrote: On 23/08/2011 07:05 AM, Steve Comstock wrote: On 8/22/2011 2:29 PM, John Walker wrote: In regards to the comments about IBM assembler manuals: The biggest issue for me is that NONE of their manuals in pdf or tso datasets have any easy connectivity. You m

Is the PoOP too big? (was Assembler manuals)

2011-08-23 Thread David Cole
(corrected formatting. sorry) At 8/23/2011 07:12 AM, Tony Thigpen wrote: Personally, I think the POP has gotten too big. It's over 1400 pages and growing. I also agree with an earlier poster that I had rather see less combining of instructions as sometimes the exceptions get lost. Absolutely!

Is the PoOP too big? (was Assembler manuals)

2011-08-23 Thread David Cole
At 8/23/2011 07:12 AM, Tony Thigpen wrote: Personally, I think the POP has gotten too big. It's over 1400 pages and growing. I also agree with an earlier poster that I had rather see less combining of instructions as sometimes the exceptions get lost. Absolutely! Here is a typical PoOP paragaph:

Re: IDF debugging authorized code

2011-08-23 Thread David Cole
Mike, FYI and FWIW: XDC has explicit and powerful support for debugging authorized code. It's had that support for several decades... Dave Cole REPLY TO: dbc...@colesoft.com ColeSoft Marketing WEB PAGE: http://www.xdc.com 736 Fox Hollow RoadVOICE:540-456-8536 Afton, VA 2

Re: Assembler manuals

2011-08-23 Thread Tony Thigpen
> In all the languages, Assembler, Cobol, PL/1 and REXX, we have a usage > guide, that tells us how to "run" the source program, and a reference > guide that rells us about the language elements. Ken, I think the problem is the initial concept of "what is assembler language?". The machine instru

Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 18 Aug 2011 to 19 Aug 2011 (#2011-135)

2011-08-23 Thread Ken Brick
On 23/08/2011 07:05 AM, Steve Comstock wrote: On 8/22/2011 2:29 PM, John Walker wrote: In regards to the comments about IBM assembler manuals: The biggest issue for me is that NONE of their manuals in pdf or tso datasets have any easy connectivity. You mean to each other? I'm not sure what 'co