Gil wrote:
>It's infuriating to make a tiny change and see the entire
>remainder of the line flip to UPPER. Will Undo fix that?
Long ago and far away (verging on 40 years), I wrote an AUTOCASE mod for XEDIT.
When CASE was UPPER, it would examine the line
before uppercasing and, if there was a
On 2020-10-24, at 19:39:43, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>
> I have a lot of xedit macros, including some post edit reformatters, but I
> never thought of that one. But, I don't think I will spend the time on it
> since I rather just switch to mixed case for the few times I really, really
> need it.
>
Gilmartin [0014e0e4a59b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu]
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2020 8:15 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reversed string macro
On 2020-10-24, at 15:06:32, Tony Thigpen wrote:
... (I normally use "case mixed ignore" in XEDIT.)
On 2020-10-24, a
On 2020-10-24, at 18:35:32, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> It is possible to write XEDIT macros to support mixed case comments with
> upper case labels and opcodes.
>
Hmmm... I could imagine:
Treat any token starting in Col. 1 as CASE UPPER.
Treat the first token following a blank on a
Correct, I typed it wrong. "case upper ignore" is what I use.
(It's been a long week)
Tony Thigpen
Paul Gilmartin wrote on 10/24/20 8:15 PM:
On 2020-10-24, at 15:06:32, Tony Thigpen wrote:
... (I normally use "case mixed ignore" in XEDIT.)
On 2020-10-24, at 16:05:59, Tony Thigpen
Gilmartin [0014e0e4a59b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu]
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2020 8:15 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reversed string macro
On 2020-10-24, at 15:06:32, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>
> ... (I normally use "case mixed ignore" in XEDIT.)
On 2
On 2020-10-24, at 15:06:32, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>
> ... (I normally use "case mixed ignore" in XEDIT.)
On 2020-10-24, at 16:05:59, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>
> It is a personal preference of mine to never edit an assembler source with
> lower-case turned on. I just do not like mixed case
Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Mike Hochee
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2020 5:55 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reversed string macro
Warning! This is a fake (spoofed) message. DO NOT TRUST!
You can also do it with two MVHHI instructions
sequential MVI's.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2020 2:07 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reversed string macro
I kinda like the concept, but a lot
Gil,
It is a personal preference of mine to never edit an assembler source
with lower-case turned on. I just do not like mixed case assembler source.
While Xedit has a lot more flexibility, especially when it comes to
locating something in the file, it always respects the SET CASE options
V.UGA.EDU]
>> On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
>> Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2020 2:07 PM
>> To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: Reversed string macro
>> I kinda like the concept, but a lot of literals we use are just 4
>> characters, so it does not scale down easily.
Thigpen
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2020 2:07 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reversed string macro
I kinda like the concept, but a lot of literals we use are just 4
characters, so it does not scale down easily.
Subject: Re: Reversed string macro
Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization.
Why not? What's wrong with MVI/MVC for 3?
Given that it would involve no storage references beyond the target and
i-cache, I wonder if the fastest way to set four bytes, without the string
appearing
Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2020 2:07 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reversed string macro
I kinda like the concept, but a lot of literals we use are just 4
characters, so it does
On 2020-10-24, at 15:06:32, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>
> I kinda like the concept, but a lot of literals we use are just 4 characters,
> so it does not scale down easily.
>
??? "scale"?
> One of the other thoughts mentioned was lower-case vs. upper-case. Maybe a
> macro that accepts upper-case,
I kinda like the concept, but a lot of literals we use are just 4
characters, so it does not scale down easily.
One of the other thoughts mentioned was lower-case vs. upper-case. Maybe
a macro that accepts upper-case, but stores it as lower-case, then ORs
it with x40 when moving it:
On 2020-10-24, at 13:48:42, Charles Mills wrote:
>
> There's another macro exercise. Given MYBLKHDR,'EYECATCH' to generate MVI
> MYBLKHDR,C'E'/MVC MYBLKHDR+1(L'MYBLKHDR-1),=C'YECATCH'
>
> An immediate instructions also "solves" my eyecatcher compare query,
> lamenting the lack of "CLCIN."
>
M
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reversed string macro
I do hope no-one is taking this thread too seriously.
The use of MVCIN to set a data area eyecatcher is incredibly
inefficient.
If you really think that there it is important to ensure that
data area eyecatchers aren't fou
I do hope no-one is taking this thread too seriously.
The use of MVCIN to set a data area eyecatcher is incredibly
inefficient.
If you really think that there it is important to ensure that
data area eyecatchers aren't found in the code which creates
them, you can copy the convention used
- From: "Tony Thigpen"
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2020 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: Reversed string macro
Robin,
The discussion (which I started)
The "discussion" was started by Steve Smith (also confirmed from the
below letter).
is about using a macro to reverse data
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Thigpen"
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2020 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: Reversed string macro
Robin,
The discussion (which I started)
The "discussion" was started by Steve Smith (also confirmed from the below
letter).
is
-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 4:24 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reversed string macro
On 2020-10-23, at 16:32:30, Charles Mills wrote:
>
> Can you code an address expression with a literal? Is MVCIN
TARGET,='Foo'+2 (or 2
On 2020-10-23, at 16:32:30, Charles Mills wrote:
>
> Can you code an address expression with a literal? Is MVCIN TARGET,='Foo'+2
> (or 2+='Foo', or some equivalent) valid? If so, you could embed your logic in
> an executable SETEYE macro that would take SETEYE TARGET,'EYECATCH' and
> generate
: Reversed string macro
The purpose, as most know, is to generate the source for an MVCIN
instruction, which was recently discussed (maybe on IBM-MAIN?).
Turns out, I found a bug in it. It drops characters when && or '' are in
the string. So replace " SETA " with "
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reversed string macro
The purpose, as most know, is to generate the source for an MVCIN
instruction, which was recently discussed (maybe on IBM-MAIN?).
Turns out, I found a bug in it. It drops characters when && or '' are in
the string. So
: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]
on behalf of robi...@dodo.com.au [robi...@dodo.com.au]
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 12:57 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reversed string macro
Have you tried MVCIN ?
Em qui, 22 de out de 2020 18:08, Steve Smith
?
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]
on behalf of robi...@dodo.com.au [robi...@dodo.com.au]
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 12:57 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reversed string macro
Have you tried MVCIN ?
Em qui, 22 de
ok if PoOps is the target
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Assembler List Em nome
de Seymour J Metz
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 23 de outubro de 2020 09:04
Para: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Assunto: Re: Reversed string macro
No. From PoOps: "The second-operand address desig
t; --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] on
> behalf of robi...@dodo.com.au [robi...@dodo.com.au]
> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 12:57 AM
> To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LI
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] on behalf
of robi...@dodo.com.au [robi...@dodo.com.au]
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 12:57 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reversed string macro
Have you tried MVCIN ?
> Em qui, 22 de out de 2
o Reginato [jb.regin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 12:34 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reversed string macro
Better could be
DCC''
Em qui, 22 de out de 2020 18:08, Steve Smith escreveu:
> Submitted for your consideration...
>
>
Have you tried MVCIN ?
Em qui, 22 de out de 2020 18:08, Steve Smith
escreveu:
Submitted for your consideration...
MACRO
#REVSTR
SETC DEQUOTE('')
SETA DCLEN('')
.*
SETA
.LOOPAIF ( LT 1).DONE
SETC ''.''(,1)
SETA
AGO .LOOP
.*
Better could be
DCC''
Em qui, 22 de out de 2020 18:08, Steve Smith escreveu:
> Submitted for your consideration...
>
> MACRO
>#REVSTR
> SETC DEQUOTE('')
>SETA DCLEN('')
> .*
>SETA
> .LOOPAIF ( LT 1).DONE
> SETC ''.''(,1)
>SETA
>
TIL: In a proportional font, an assembler macro looks like modern poetry.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 5:08 PM Steve Smith wrote:
> Submitted for your consideration...
>
> MACRO
>#REVSTR
> SETC DEQUOTE('')
>SETA DCLEN('')
> .*
>SETA
> .LOOPAIF ( LT 1).DONE
Submitted for your consideration...
MACRO
#REVSTR
SETC DEQUOTE('')
SETA DCLEN('')
.*
SETA
.LOOPAIF ( LT 1).DONE
SETC ''.''(,1)
SETA
AGO .LOOP
.*
.DONEANOP
DCC''
EQU *-1,
MEND
E.G.:
3161 *
3162 #TAG
35 matches
Mail list logo
