Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript catches

gt; > Thomas > > > > > > > Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > Datum:28.08.2017 02:00 > Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript catches > ---

Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript catches

or example) possible to define policy set loops. Thomas Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> Datum: 28.08.2017 02:00 Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript catches >From what you descri

Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript catches

ppens the resulting rule, what else!? > > > > > > Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > Datum:21.08.2017 19:25 > Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript

Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript catches

cy has a block only, line that inherits that has a good, etc. What a question ?? It happens the resulting rule, what else!? Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> Datum: 21.08.2017 19:25 Betreff: Re: [A

Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript catches

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Thomas Eckardt wrote: > > >I'm wondering if you should pose your question as a new thread so that > others who typically ignore threads that they're not originally a part of > could chime in. > > This is the development test list - I

Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript catches

Thomas Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> Datum: 21.08.2017 18:17 Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript catches Wow wee!!! This is terrific news!! I'm wondering if you should pose your questi

Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript catches

n - should it be possible to define dependencies for > the different assp mail flags (whitelisted and noprocessing). like: > > (-i wl np)*@otherdomain.com => policy2|policy5 > > where (-i wl np) will be interpreted as : inheritance OFF, applies to > whitelisted and n

Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript catches

rocessing senders only Any suggestion on this? Thomas Von: K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> Datum: 14.08.2017 15:22 Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript catches --

Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript catches

tance OFF, applies to whitelisted and noprocessing senders only Any suggestion on this? Thomas Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> Datum: 14.08.2017 15:22 Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript c

Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript catches

As always, I appreciate your input. I feared this was going to be your response. Most of these erroneously blocked mails come from big providers (like travel agency confirmation pdfs). I'm surprised that they have javascript, but they do. We've been adding exceptions, which isn't fun, but is

Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript catches

One line of bad JS code is enough to completely destroy an IT environment (petabytes of data and thousands of machines in some minutes). Such code can be encrypted, encoded and obviuscated in any not thinkable way. It is simply not possible to classify JS code or to know how any of the