---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3476/#review11739
---
./asterisk/trunk/lib/python/asterisk/memory_test_condition.py
On 23/04/14 18:52, Asterisk Development Team wrote:
--===4365525224653466459==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
...
* ASTERISK-23028 - [patch] Asterisk man pages contains unquoted
minus signs (Reported by Jeremy Lainé)
...
*
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3477/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: Asterisk
On April 19, 2014, 4:07 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
It looks like these patches were merely attached to the review board
posting, as opposed to being uploaded using post-review or uploaded
directly as a diff. That makes it very hard to review.
Please review the instructions for using
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3443/
---
(Updated April 25, 2014, 10:17 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3478/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3479/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: testsuite
Hi all,
I'm using Queue function of Asterisk to arrange calls which is coming to my
agents. I want to customize the way asterisk arrange coming call, in other
word, is it possible to create a new option instead of using the existing:
RINGALL, ROUNDROBIN,... . For example: The incoming call
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Walter Doekes
walter+asterisk-...@osso.nl wrote:
On 23/04/14 18:52, Asterisk Development Team wrote:
--===4365525224653466459==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
...
* ASTERISK-23028 - [patch] Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3478/#review11741
---
Ship it!
/branches/12/res/res_pjsip_session.c
Just something I know which may restrict what can be done. Avaya have many
patents for call distribution. This includes call distribution to agents
who have spent the least amount of time on the phone and taken the lowest
number of calls.
On 25 Apr 2014 15:00, Nguyen Hoang Son nh...@vasc.com.vn
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3479/#review11742
---
/asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/call_pickup/run-test
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3449/
---
(Updated April 25, 2014, 9:27 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3457/
---
(Updated April 25, 2014, 9:32 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On April 24, 2014, 10:46 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
I suggest writing a sample yaml file that illustrates how this is intended
to be used and explains what the default values are for the various
configuration options.
I'll start working on that. In the mean time, I'm going to go ahead
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3476/
---
(Updated April 25, 2014, 2:46 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3420/#review11743
---
./asterisk/trunk/lib/python/asterisk/pluggable_modules.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3476/
---
(Updated April 25, 2014, 3:41 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3480/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3446/
---
(Updated April 25, 2014, 11:54 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
On April 24, 2014, 5:21 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
/branches/12/res/parking/parking_manager.c, lines 461-463
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3446/diff/3/?file=57809#file57809line461
Moving this to where you test bridge_channel for NULL only leaves two
places where bridge_channel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3417/#review11747
---
Ship it!
/trunk/res/res_manager_devicestate.c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3403/
---
(Updated April 25, 2014, 12:34 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3474/
---
(Updated April 25, 2014, 5:37 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3337/
---
(Updated April 25, 2014, 12:41 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1803/
---
(Updated April 25, 2014, 12:48 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On April 25, 2014, 1:03 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
/branches/11/channels/chan_sip.c, lines 21287-21295
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3474/diff/3/?file=57909#file57909line21287
These are supposed to be AST_TRANSPORT_xxx declarations.
SIP_TRANSPORT_xxx declarations don't exist.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3471/#review11750
---
While I appreciate the contribution to Asterisk and the
On April 25, 2014, 1:03 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
/branches/11/channels/chan_sip.c, lines 21287-21295
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3474/diff/3/?file=57909#file57909line21287
These are supposed to be AST_TRANSPORT_xxx declarations.
SIP_TRANSPORT_xxx declarations don't exist.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3474/#review11755
---
Ship it!
I think this is a very good addition ready to be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3481/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-23605
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3481/#review11756
---
branches/11/res/res_http_websocket.c
On April 25, 2014, 12:02 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
/branches/12/channels/chan_pjsip.c, line 927
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3480/diff/1/?file=57904#file57904line927
I'm not sure about using threadstorage for this. One of the places that
this gets called from is the bridging
Just a quick suggestion to enhance function Read.
I am using function read in places to provide options to skip announcements or
provide hidden features. However the minimum timeout is 1 second which puts an
unnatural pause in the flow of announcements when not skipping.
It would be great if
You're holding it wrong.
There are several ways to accomplish this, the easiest is to play all sound
files with one Read, like:
Read(fwdto,call-fwd-unconditionalplease-enter-thedigits/11digit/igc/sounds/destinationtelephone-number,11,,1,6)
If you can't play all the sound files with one Read,
On April 10, 2014, 6:44 a.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
/asterisk/trunk/tests/rest_api/bridges/playback/tones/test-config.yaml,
line 80
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3428/diff/1/?file=57149#file57149line80
This is a bridge test, so you need dependencies other than just
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3420/
---
(Updated April 25, 2014, 8:28 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3476/#review11758
---
./asterisk/trunk/lib/python/asterisk/memory_test_condition.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3476/
---
(Updated April 25, 2014, 8:42 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3428/
---
(Updated April 25, 2014, 4:21 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3482/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-23671
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3485/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers, Matt Jordan and Mark Michelson.
Yes that's a good idea. This fixes one of my issues however it doesn't when
I have two reads one after the other.
It would still be good if there was a parameter to have no delay.
J
-Original Message-
From: Eric Wieling
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 8:54 PM
To: Jonathan White ;
://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20140425
44 matches
Mail list logo
