Hi All;
I do not know if the SEP_Mac_address.cnf.xml of the cisco file is also has
effecting on the DID and Caller ID to appear at the destination, because I
found the following:
localCfwdEnabletrue/localCfwdEnable
semiAttendedTransfertrue/semiAttendedTransfer
Actually it doesn't say AGI(async:script) it says AGI(async:agi) and than
continues further to setting up an AMI user so the script is executed through
the manager interface?? Than it says AGI(agi:async).?? Well most importantly
it says Cons of async AGI: It is the most complex method of using
Did you add the Set(CALLERID(num) as I have previously pointed out?
On 9/25/11, bilal ghayyad bilmar...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi All;
I do not know if the SEP_Mac_address.cnf.xml of the cisco file is also has
effecting on the DID and Caller ID to appear at the destination, because I
found the
Oh! I was informed that Async:AGI is an AGI that is called in from AMI. Do
tell more about it.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Mehmet Avcioglu meh...@activecom.netwrote:
Actually it doesn't say AGI(async:script) it says AGI(async:agi) and
than continues further to setting up an AMI user so
Hi
Do this script run without async option.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 18:19, Sam Govind govoi...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh! I was informed that Async:AGI is an AGI that is called in from AMI. Do
tell more about it.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Mehmet Avcioglu meh...@activecom.netwrote:
On 11-09-25 01:54 AM, Антон Квашёнкин wrote:
Just use cli aliases, provided by res_clialiases.so.
2011/9/25 Bruce Bbruceb...@gmail.com
Please don't feed the trolls. Thanks.
--
Paul Belanger
Digium, Inc. | Software Developer
twitter: pabelanger | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode)
Check us out at:
Paul,
These trolls are the people who put your kid to school and put food on your
table by giving valuable input and testing the open source software.
Are you sure Digium endorses this stand of yours? Does everyone at Digium
think the users who gives feedback that is not exactly what you like is
On 09/26/2011 01:01 AM, Bruce B wrote:
Paul,
These trolls are the people who put your kid to school and put food on
your table by giving valuable input and testing the open source software.
Are you sure Digium endorses this stand of yours? Does everyone at
Digium think the users who gives
On 11-09-25 01:01 PM, Bruce B wrote:
Paul,
These trolls are the people who put your kid to school and put food on your
table by giving valuable input and testing the open source software.
Are you sure Digium endorses this stand of yours? Does everyone at Digium
think the users who gives
We need explicit namespaces with asterisk CLI commands
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Paul Belanger pabelan...@digium.com wrote:
On 11-09-25 01:01 PM, Bruce B wrote:
Paul,
These trolls are the people who put your kid to school and put food on
your
table by giving valuable input and
Dear;
By the way, the asterisk version is: 1.8.4.2
Yes I tried Set(CALLERID(num)=5631040) as shown in the below dialing, and no
success. Also I tried Set(CALLERID(num)=1040) and I tried
Set(CALLERID(num)=065631040) as the city code is 06 and when we call any
mobile, it is appearing
Paul,
LOL...you are trying to change the subject. That's naive.
You clearly know that I complained that there is no need for such drastic
changes and long commands. The fact that it's written in CHANGES file or if
there was a commit for it doesn't make it any better. Stop with the flawed
On 11-09-25 02:23 PM, Bruce B wrote:
Paul,
LOL...you are trying to change the subject. That's naive.
You clearly know that I complained that there is no need for such drastic
changes and long commands. The fact that it's written in CHANGES file or if
there was a commit for it doesn't make it
On 09/25/2011 02:23 PM, Bruce B wrote:
Stop wishing for that. I like Asterisk and I will raise a voice
when I feel uncomfortable with changes.
You won't get an audience if the way you go about it is dickish.
You're being a dick, and you know you're being a dick. You're just
unwilling to
On 09/25/2011 04:41 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Sometimes people get such swelled heads they need a slap back to reality
- I completely agree with him the changes were idiotic.
Obviously the comments touched a nerve with you or you would not have
replied.
On 09/25/2011 02:23 PM, Bruce B
On 09/25/2011 04:46 PM, jon pounder wrote:
Sometimes people get such swelled heads they need a slap back to
reality - I completely agree with him the changes were idiotic.
Obviously the comments touched a nerve with you or you would not have
replied.
I don't think very highly of the changes
jon pounder wrote:
On 09/25/2011 04:41 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Sometimes people get such swelled heads they need a slap back to reality - I
completely agree with him the changes were idiotic.
Obviously the comments touched a nerve with you or you would not have replied.
And let's not
Hello Everyone,
I have MOH, Sip Friends/Peers, Voice Mail all working realtime. I was
wondering if it Is possible to have Asterisk make a calls based on a
record inserted in a table realtime? If I have to develop something using AGI
or AMI, I can do this with a little direction?
Thanks in
I am adding dickish to my dictionary - thats a hot one!
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 25, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Alex Balashov abalas...@evaristesys.com wrote:
On 09/25/2011 02:23 PM, Bruce B wrote:
Stop wishing for that. I like Asterisk and I will raise a voice
when I feel uncomfortable with
You are very childish besides being very useless.
Also, note that there are others that are bothered by the same changes that
are uncalled for. I was as constructive as possible but you think starting a
sentence with I am not trying to be rude... is rude. LOL. I have said that
upfront so idiots
Confirm with your provider that allow you to set caller id on outbound.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 1:59 PM, bilal ghayyad bilmar...@yahoo.com wrote:
Dear;
By the way, the asterisk version is: 1.8.4.2
Yes I tried Set(CALLERID(num)=5631040) as shown in the below dialing, and no
success. Also I
On 09/25/2011 08:47 PM, Bruce B wrote:
This is becoming just like the bacula mailing list where anyone that
knows anything is beaten into submission for daring to question the
great and powerful oz.
You are very childish besides being very useless.
Also, note that there are others that
First of all, what the heck is this link you referenced:
http://lists.digium.com/**pipermail/asterisk-users/2010-**April/247084.htmlhttp://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2010-April/247084.html
??
Secondly, an Asterisk 1.6.2.18 that I am running right now plays nicely with
help
On 11-09-25 08:57 PM, Bruce B wrote:
First of all, what the heck is this link you referenced:
http://lists.digium.com/**pipermail/asterisk-users/2010-**April/247084.htmlhttp://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2010-April/247084.html
??
Secondly, an Asterisk 1.6.2.18 that I am
Thank you for a constructive reply. I am not a war monger and I appreciate a
proper response.
I will explore my options to that. My opinion may still be that such long
commands are unnecessary but at least it seems there is a way to go around
them for now and I am happy to hear that.
On Sun,
Danny Nicholas wrote:
2. Don't know if moving to 10.x would help you, but since that is still
considered beta, that's probably not an option anyhow.
Yup, not really an option for me. I actually use this system daily and
don't want to muck around with 10.0 just yet.
3. My understanding is that
On 09/25/2011 04:46 PM, jon pounder wrote:
Sometimes people get such swelled heads they need a slap back to
reality - I completely agree with him the changes were idiotic.
Obviously the comments touched a nerve with you or you would not have
replied.
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, Alex Balashov
It doesn't work at all with the dahdi timers
The reason it works it works till the first reload is because you are
preloading it before dahdi so it starts and uses the pthread timer later when
you reload it starts using the dahdi timer and there it goes
-Original Message-
From: Luke
Hmmm..interesting..I haven't came across anything like this so far..How
about making a new table for the insertion of a new call data..and trigger
some script to activate AMI/Call file according to new call data.
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/faqs-triggers.html#qandaitem-B-5-1-10
On
Great explanation. Makes complete sense to me.
Any workaround you can think of?
-Vladimir
On 9/26/2011 12:26 AM, isr...@gmail.com wrote:
It doesn't work at all with the dahdi timers
The reason it works it works till the first reload is because you are
preloading it before dahdi so it
30 matches
Mail list logo
