Hi everyone,
I am fairly new to the idea of VoIP, although I've been reading about it
off and on for the last few years. Now it is starting to look mature
enough to consider implementing it, but there is one thing that I
haven't been able to get a clear answer on...
With Vonage, you are
Is Asterisk capable of allowing for the recording of calls on a per
extension basis?
--
Best regards,
Charles
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
1. Is Asterisk capable of allowing for setting up Groups so that only
one extension in a Group can selectively monitor one of the other
extensions in the Group (but none of the others can initiate it)?
This would be for Managers to listen to Sales Calls of other members of
their Team, to
On 3/22/2006 Avi Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
A smarthost is another SMTP server (e.g. your corporate email server,
which should already be capable of sending outbound email) that your
Asterisk box is configured to send all outgoing mail to, instead of
trying to deliver it directly.
Kris Edwards wrote:
Absolutely. This is well documented on the wiki at voip-info.org
http://voip-info.org (as are the possible legal issues that you may
have by recording the calls). Search for info about the asterisk
application Monitor.
Great, thanks! We will be doing this with full
C F wrote:
Polycoms are not the best if you want a phone that works behind NAT.
Do you mean in general? Or only if you are trying to interconnect
multiple offices?
Are Polycoms fine for just one office, if the entire office is behind a
NAT device, and the phones are only being used for
mustardman29 wrote:
I might as well jump in. I am not clear on what the problem is but whether
it's a problem on something that needs to be done frequently or infrequently
or perhaps can be avoided with little effort, it's still a problem.
Your argument is more like the classic it's not a
Whether or not a forum is a better idea isn't really depending on the
subject matter IMHO. Its success or failure depends on what the
prospective participants like better. I personally cannot stand forums.
That's a place where I have to expend energy to go there and manually
click through
David Rahn wrote:
This would lend its self to less repitition of questions as the lists
would be much more searchable At this time I 3 months of this list
and it is over 13,900 messages.
In other words GREAT IDEA I THIRD THAT!!
I do think all hardware disscussion ( as it effects
On 3/16/2006 El Flynn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'm trying to compile the assman package
This is a jok, right? I mean, no one would actually name a project
something like 'assman', would they?
lol
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
On 3/17/2006 Douglas Garstang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It doesn't matter how often I expect them to go down. You have to
plan for the worst. People are used to say, being unable to access a
web page for a few minutes. Heck, they might not even notice.
However, when someone's phone system
Philip Edelbrock wrote:
At some point (in a few months, probably) we'll turn off the Toshiba
and put viop phones on everyone's desk (including some people's at a
remote office and homes).
It should also cut our phone bill down to a 1/10th of what it is now!
Interesting... so, you consider
the
voicemail system it forces on us.
Can anyone provide any feedback on using this system with Asterisk? Am I
wasting my time even thinking about it?
Thanks,
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers International
678.578.2200 x224
678.578.2240 fax
I run Asterisk partnered up to the 280 (424 for us). We have a 6 cabinet
installation of the Toshiba so I understand you dilemma. There are some
quirks with the 280 that make it a challenge to use Asterisk with, but
it's do-able. Keep in mind, you can move to the CTX or the CIX and still
keep
14 matches
Mail list logo
