It's noteworthy that while Linux is GPL'ed, that doesn't mean that the
userspace applications that essentially make up the Snom phone and run
on top of the GPL'ed Linux kernel are.
Snom will gladly give you their customizations to the kernel, and a
build environment that will produce a firmware im
Yes.
It works as it is supposed to.
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bartosz Jozwiak
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003
1:31 PM
To: ASTERISK USERS
Subject: [Asterisk-Users]
consultative transfer cisco
Dustin,
It's quite a pain to get those without a CallManager...
However, there are some tools for extracting the compressed files from
an InstallShield image and I have successfully done so with those files
in particular and was able with some tweaking to get a phone back to
Skinny without having
I doubt if you'll be able to. They made a strategic decision to GPL
rather than LGPL their client access libraries, as they wanted to up
their proprietary license revenue. Essentially, they're trying to
enhance the benefits of paying for a commercial license fee, by making
it difficult to use MyS
Nope...
Nortel's M series is for the Meridian series PBXs/switches... It's a
proprietary digital interface.
I doubt it will ever happen.
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason A.
Pattie
Sent: Monday, September 29
I would imagine that it would boil down to the niceties of having one
source tree for the core product, regardless of license chosen?
Just a guess.
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West
Sent: Monday, Septembe
I've never attempted this in CIPE, though I have tested a SIP session
through IPSEC with no trouble.
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Senad
Jordanovic
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 2:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
the time,
what I saw was scary.
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
- Original Message -
From: "WipeOut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 4:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 experiences..
> Matthew Hardeman wrote:
>
It can be done, with some limitations. I've
tried a couple simple tests between a couple of Nokia 3650's...
It's noteworthy that the fastchat program for
symbian phones has some voip capabilities... See www.fastchat.com for more info.
As far as trying to do a true, realtime
bi-direction
It's ok... The voice sounds fine. It's superior to most cell phone
calls, anyway.
I've used it with the Cisco 7960's without any trouble.
You can use asterisk in any way that uses it in console mode. Safe
asterisk does so, so you can use it. This may be otherwise fixed, but
I'm not sure. As
I've found there are some bugs they don't list (bugs of great severity)
that are fixed in the latest release that can cause trouble in certain
environments. The phone's handling of ICMP redirects in a multihomed
Ethernet environment (two separate, exclusive subnets running on a
single segment) is
GrayBar or any electrical supply that handles telephony has them.
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Critchfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Source for 50-pin amphenol cable
LOL
No.
The codec in asterisk is really g729a. It's labeled as b for some
bizarre historical reason.
It *will* work with any SIP phone that properly supports G729a. I use
it with the Cisco 7960s with great success.
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
Yes!
The registration hardware locks to system parameters, and does some
software locking to certain inodes in your linux fs.
You must run registration on the production server. Their license
scheme sucks!
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[E
To clarify, you have to upgrade to 3.1 or 3.2 first, before attempting a
version four load.
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James
Sizemore
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 1:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Are the VoiceAge people generally unpleasant to work with and geniunely
uncaring, or do they just fail to respond?
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Spencer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-
I've never actually placed a call with the budgetone, but it just looks and
feels cheap. The Snom is much nicer, and I tend to find that the Cisco
7960s/7940s are quite nice as well.
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
- Original Message -
From: "Uriel Carrasquilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL
If I had to venture a guess, I would say that the protection scheme is in
place in the hopes that everyone will use their implementation rather than
reinvent the wheel. If this is indeed the case, their protection scheme is
useful in helping to protect the patent license as well as their code. So
Another approach would be...
Just modify the mod_g729b.so such that the licensing constraints aren't
so problematic...
A little bird said it shouldn't be hard to do so...
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jan Rycht
on schemes on Word or Excel, and their
> applications sales have never looked back.
>
> Inconveniencing the genuine customers is a proven loser. Perhaps the
> music industry will learn this soon.
>
> Regards,
> Steve
>
>
> Matthew Hardeman wrote:
>
> >If I had
I've seen a number of anti-spam services that functioned on a community
basis (automatically) by accepting submissions from verifiably distinct
users and only blocking temporarily (for exponentially increasing time
intervals) based on an algorithm that factored in unique reports from
distinct users
This is generally indicates a problem with the licensing process (which
is severely flawed and full of bugs) on your server... Did you make it
through the registration process OK?
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of An
As I understand it, the playback applications need to have native access to
a piece of digium hardware to perform well... Under the virtual machine,
that won't happen.
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
- Original Message -
From: "David Boreham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sa
newsgroup format
On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 12:11, Matthew Hardeman wrote:
> I feel your pain!
>
> I tend to prefer html based forums... They keep threads well
organized,
> cause less overhead on the server, conserve bandwidth, etc...
I understand you are a crack addict by your use of
I agree!
phpbb is great!
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jltaylor
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: list format vs newsgroup format
"IF" there was a consi
I feel your pain!
I tend to prefer html based forums... They keep threads well organized,
cause less overhead on the server, conserve bandwidth, etc...
They also give visual priority to new threads and active threads...
On the other hand, to deal with forums, you actually have to go check
them.
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Hardeman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:58 PM
Subject: RE:
[Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960
I’ve run into this
before, and it’s a pain to debug…
Be sure that your eth0
interface (primary, first inte
Hey Kim!
I used to run that scam myself! You go! Back in the day, actually, I had our
legacy lucent merlin phone system wired up to a modem on a webserver which
could config it… And with some voicemail tricks and the like, it was
possible for me to visit a little WAP site on my phone,
I’ve run into this before, and it’s
a pain to debug…
Be sure that your eth0 interface (primary,
first interface) is set to your internal address space (of the same subnet that
you assign to the phone). You can add an
IP alias on eth0:1 if you need an external IP on that box as well, b
In my experience it depends on who or what you are speaking G729 to, but
yes, generally...
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jan Rychter
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 7:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Us
I'm not familiar with the codec support in Gnomeeting, but have you tried a
codec like iLBC? I had great success running ilbc over IAX2 between my home
and office.
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Rychter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday,
chan_sccp would be nice :)
I've been playing around with the 7960's and have really enjoyed the 7960 as
a desktop phone. It's physically well constructed, has a sturdy/heavy
handset (a good thing in my book), a very pleasant user interface... And if
you're willing to make changes to your network
Missing something?
No...
So far as I'm aware there is no freely available G729 codec available
that will run under Linux... Kind of funny that there *is* one for
Windows, isn't it?
As an aside, though, what kind of equipment are you using, and what
circumstances are you communicating in? ALAW
Hi All!
Can anyone direct me to any websites / manufacturers out
there who are making small, put-it-in-the-closet-and-forget-it type systems for
building routers, home gateway servers, that sort of thing?
My fantasy machine for this purpose would be along the lines
of a mini-itx sys
Maybe it's just me...
But I fail to see the reasoning behind branching to a whole new
distribution just to support an easy, out of the box Asterisk install.
Perhaps just the creation of an RPM package with a basic configuration
would be the ticket?
The one potential exception to this would be if
If you're on a RedHat system, mpg321 is installed by default, and is
symlinked to as mpg123...
So, it can easily look like you have mpg123, but you really have mpg321...
Sorry if you checked for that, and I've offended, but just thought I'd
offer.
Matt Hardeman
PaperSoft
- Original Message
PaperSoft
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Howlett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960s
> Cisco and bugtraq need to know this!
>
> josh.
>
> On Fri, 2003-07-11 at
Cisco should really be ashamed of this
product...
While it is physically well constructed, and has
excellent sound quality along with a very pleasant user interface, the device
has SERIOUS stability issues, unless you run your network with an iron
fist...
Quite by accident, while configu
Hi All!
First, let me introduce myself, as this is my first post to
the list (I’ve been lurking for quite some time now).
My name is Matt Hardeman, and I work for a software
development firm in Birmingham, AL.
We are interested in the Asterisk PBX and it’s
various configurations
Hi all!
I have a new Cisco 7960 that I am testing out with asterisk,
but it is currently loaded with the CallManager firmware…
The reseller has sent me the latest SIP firmware files to
load onto the phone, but as is mentioned in the Cisco FAQ entry for converting
a CallManager phone
40 matches
Mail list logo
