Re: [asterisk-users] Delay in IVR

2010-06-09 Thread Sasa
Hi, sorry for my insistence but I would your aid for my problem. Thanks. -- Salvatore. - Original Message - From: Sasa s...@shoponweb.it To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 9:51 AM Subject

Re: [asterisk-users] Delay in IVR

2010-06-09 Thread Sasa
you setup everything else that leads to trunk. Respectfully Michael D Mosier Ftoc Certified On Jun 9, 2010 2:53 AM, Sasa s...@shoponweb.it wrote: Hi, sorry for my insistence but I would your aid for my problem. Thanks. -- Salvatore. - Original Message - From: Sasa s

Re: [asterisk-users] Delay in IVR

2010-06-03 Thread Sasa
Hi, I have tried with a some change in IVR configuration but the result isn't changed, I have tried with Enable Directory and Enable Direct Dial disabled, also I have tried with timeout=1 but nothing is changed ! My IVR configuration is: trixbox1*CLI dialplan show ivr-2 [ Context 'ivr-2'

Re: [asterisk-users] Delay in IVR

2010-06-03 Thread Sasa
: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Delay in IVR On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 14:41 +0100, Kingsley Tart wrote: On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 15:09 +0200, Sasa wrote: HI, I have in 'inbound route' a IVR, with press 1 or 2 the destination call is always a ring group called '600

[asterisk-users] Delay in IVR

2010-05-24 Thread Sasa
HI, I have in 'inbound route' a IVR, with press 1 or 2 the destination call is always a ring group called '600', my problem is that after press 1 (but this problem is present also with press 2) before that the inbound call is transfer to extension pass 10/11 seconds ! In attach log file about

[asterisk-users] PCI analog cards on * vs. Quintum

2009-11-21 Thread Sasa Bobek
What is the verdict? There was one positive response, but would like to hear a few more. In addition, what I am looking at is FXO ports to be used with GSM gateways, so any recommendations for specific cards are welcomed. From my experience with PRI cards, I am a little biased toward Sangoma.

[asterisk-users] chan_mobile handle 92 log flood

2009-08-06 Thread Sasa Bobek
Dear all, Picked up some more BT usb adapters and got a flood of error messages as follows: hci_scodata_packet: *hci0 SCO packet for unknown connection handle 92* Anyone has any idea how to deal with this? Sasa Bobek ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_mobile one device per dongle?

2009-07-18 Thread Sasa Bobek
yes, only one device per USB dongle. On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Steve Totaro stot...@totarotechnologies.com wrote: Hello, I read on the wiki that chan_mobile supports one device per dongle. Is this still the case? From the official website, there is very little info but this line

Re: [asterisk-users] Latest chan_mobile

2009-07-18 Thread Sasa Bobek
In general, I found it hard to get chan_mobile working straight out of the box, and although there is a great effort to make it so, phone manufacturers are not helping by making command sets and BT implementations different from device to device, SW version to SW version. Elastix seems to have

Re: [asterisk-users] Latest chan_mobile

2009-07-18 Thread Sasa Bobek
successfully? If so, I will consider the switch. I can't jump to another distribution easily because I have a working environment that will make really hard the migration. On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Sasa Bobek sasa.bobek...@gmail.comwrote: In general, I found it hard to get chan_mobile

Re: [asterisk-users] open source call center application for Asterisk

2009-07-13 Thread Sasa Bobek
Truth is you don't need anything more then Asterisk to configure a call center On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:19 PM, ashish chauhan ashishchauhan07...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, I am new to asterisk.i like to configure call center using asterisk.please can anyone tell me open source

Re: [asterisk-users] Using a mobile phone via USB as an extension

2009-07-09 Thread Sasa Bobek
Just google/bing it. http://voip-info.org/wiki/view/chan_mobile On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Olivier oza-4...@myamail.com wrote: 2009/7/2 Carlos Ruiz Diaz carlos.ruizd...@gmail.com Check chan_mobile. Now is mature enough to be used in a server with low CPS. The USB connectivity will be

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_mobile help.

2009-07-07 Thread Sasa Bobek
Could not agree more. I had chan_mobile up and running with an older version of Trix, but never managed to recreate it with the latest versions. Other people I talked to even suggested that it was made on purpose. With elastix the only problem I had was the missing mobile.conf.example, but you

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_mobile help.

2009-07-05 Thread Sasa Bobek
I had loads of issues when trying i on trix, but the same procedure worked like a charm with elastix. On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Razza razz...@gmail.com wrote: I've been failing to get chan_mobile working, so am looking to the experts to help :o) I have followed this guide -

Re: [asterisk-users] *Sort of Commercial* TracFone's $45 unlimited offer to 'stun' rivals

2009-07-03 Thread Sasa Bobek
Chan_mobile supports SMS with a limited number of phones On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Steve Totaro stot...@totarotechnologies.com wrote: Great for Chan_Mobile and GSM modem for SMS in Kannel or if Asterisk supports SMS over GSM modem. I know chan_mobile had SMS in the future at one point

Re: [asterisk-users] NOT chan_mobile

2009-06-27 Thread Sasa Bobek
Same here. On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Razza razz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, does anyone know of an application that will run in Windows (in my case users PC's) and behave in a similar fasion to chan_mobile? I'd like the app to register with asterisk, then talk to a (or a number of)

[asterisk-users] Working chan_mobile/bluez anyone?

2009-06-24 Thread Sasa Bobek
Hi all, Before I start with analog GSM gateways I wanted to check if maybe someone actually got a working combination of chan_mobile and bluez. If you do please share specifics like versions, phone, BT chipset, any other relevant info. Thanks, Sasa Bobek

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7941G Auth

2009-06-23 Thread Sasa
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7941G Auth Hey Sasa, I have templates of all the files you need here (SEP file, extension file): http://dave.vc/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/phoneadd.zip If you need further assistance, let me know. Thanks Dave -Original Message

[asterisk-users] GSM mobile trunks

2009-06-23 Thread Sasa Bobek
Hi all, We have been planing for a long time to set up GSM mobile trunks for termination, and were planing on going with analog GSM adapters connected to a VoIP gateway. Should we be concerned with such a set-up as far as voice quality and other issues are concerned? Any experiences with GSM

Re: [asterisk-users] GSM mobile trunks

2009-06-23 Thread Sasa Bobek
The price difference is HUGE. Analog i about 66% cheaper. On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Gordon Henderson gordon+aster...@drogon.net gordon%2baster...@drogon.net wrote: On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Sasa Bobek wrote: Hi all, We have been planing for a long time to set up GSM mobile trunks

Re: [asterisk-users] GSM mobile trunks

2009-06-23 Thread Sasa Bobek
, 23 Jun 2009, Sasa Bobek wrote: Hi all, We have been planing for a long time to set up GSM mobile trunks for termination, and were planing on going with analog GSM adapters connected to a VoIP gateway. Should we be concerned with such a set-up as far as voice quality and other

Re: [asterisk-users] GSM mobile trunks

2009-06-23 Thread Sasa Bobek
of the FXS/FXO port is about 50E. Sasa On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Gordon Henderson gordon+aster...@drogon.net gordon%2baster...@drogon.net wrote: On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Sasa Bobek wrote: The price difference is HUGE. Analog i about 66% cheaper. But you then need some sort of analogue

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7941G Auth

2009-06-22 Thread Sasa
be something like this: device loadInformationSIP41.8-0-2SR1S/loadInformation /device And you shouldn't need the tlv file. -Jonathan On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Sasa s...@shoponweb.it wrote: David Gibbons wrote: I've found that different types of TFTP servers return

[asterisk-users] Cisco 7941G Auth

2009-06-19 Thread Sasa
Hi, I use Asterisk-1.4.22-3 (on Trixbox) and I have a problem with Cisco 7941G with firmware SIP41.8-0-2SR1S (but also with SIP41.8-3-1S), my problem is that Cisco phone isn't authenticated on Asterisk. In tftp directory I have: apps41.1-1-1-15.sbn cnu41.3-1-1-15.sbn copstart.sh

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7941G Auth

2009-06-19 Thread Sasa
. -- Salvatore. - Original Message - From: John Novack jnov...@stromberg-carlson.org To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 4:38 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7941G Auth Sasa wrote: Hi

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7941G Auth

2009-06-19 Thread Sasa
Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7941G Auth Sasa wrote: Hi, I use Asterisk-1.4.22-3 (on Trixbox) and I have a problem with Cisco 7941G with firmware SIP41.8-0-2SR1S (but also with SIP41.8-3-1S), my problem is that Cisco phone isn't authenticated on Asterisk. In tftp directory I

Re: [asterisk-users] Portech MV3770 Caller-ID

2009-03-10 Thread Sasa
Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:51 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Portech MV3770 Caller-ID 2009/3/9 Sasa s...@shoponweb.it Hi, I have a problem with Asterisk-1.4.22 (with TB 2.6.2) Portech MV-370, my problem is that when arrived an external call I

[asterisk-users] Portech MV3770 Caller-ID

2009-03-09 Thread Sasa
Hi, I have a problem with Asterisk-1.4.22 (with TB 2.6.2) Portech MV-370, my problem is that when arrived an external call I don't view (on my internal phone) the phone number but I have the number extension that is configured on MV-370. The MV-370 configuration is: Mobile to Lan Table : 0 *

[asterisk-users] Problem with Portech

2008-10-21 Thread Sasa
Hi, I use Asterisk-1.2.26 (with Trixbox-2.1.12) and Portech MV-370 and my problem is that when I try to call an external mobile phone via Portech I have alway busy and in log file: Called Portech/348xxx -- Got SIP response 486 Busy Here back from 192.168.1.2-- SIP/Portech-086e5ee0 is busy ==

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP

2008-10-21 Thread Sasa
to a version it can cope with. If its not asking for any files then usually what I have done is to go to the lowest SIP version 2 or 3 for changing from the call manager to SIP and reset the phone to factory defaults and try and get it to start the change again Cheers Duncan Sasa wrote: Hi Duncan

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP

2008-10-17 Thread Sasa
P0S3-06-2-00.sbn -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 486570 2007-04-27 14:51 P0S3-06-2-00.bin -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 392214 2007-04-27 14:51 P0S30202.bin I can't recall if I need all the 08-6 versions Cheers Duncan Sasa wrote: Hi Duncan, I have tried more times to make the reset phone but is displays

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP

2008-10-14 Thread Sasa
whether its asking for SIP or SCCP files, and if SIP which version of firmware for the phone Cheers Duncan Sasa wrote: Hi Dave, I don't view nothing in tftp server because the phone is stopped on start screen with displayed 'upgrading' and MAC address..I don't understand what happened after

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP

2008-10-14 Thread Sasa
/var/log/messages' should do the trick. Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sasa Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:57 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP

2008-10-13 Thread Sasa
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sasa Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 10:46 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP Hi Dave, I have tried restore to factory default value (as you have recommended

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP

2008-10-13 Thread Sasa
and you should be good to go. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sasa Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:24 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP Hi, I have try

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP

2008-10-09 Thread Sasa
: Thursday, October 09, 2008 1:27 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP Sasa schrieb: I need other files other than those obtained with cmterm-7911_7906-sip.8-0-4sr1.cop ?? cmterm is the callmanager software. You need to get the non-callmanager SIP-software. Contact your local Cisco

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP

2008-10-09 Thread Sasa
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP Sasa, You can actually just rename the .cop file to a .tar.gz file. Cisco doesn't have (to my knowledge) any non-callmanager SIP software. The SIP load is just a SIP load, not a SIP load unique to generic SIP or callmanager. Dave

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP

2008-10-09 Thread Sasa
: David Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 2:59 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP Sasa, Sometimes I have to do a hard reset of the phone in order to get

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP

2008-10-09 Thread Sasa
Hi, sorry for my insistence but for me is a big problem ! :-( ...someone have the same problem ? Thanks in advance. -- Salvatore. - Original Message - From: Sasa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP

2008-10-07 Thread Sasa
the current hardware in the status, if its SIP it will be something like POS-0806... (I haven't got a phone handy to check) but there is a reasonable amount of info on voipinfo about the process Cheers Duncan Sasa wrote: Hi, I have a problem with Cisco 7906G and SIP protocol use with Asterisk

[asterisk-users] Cisco 7906g SIP

2008-10-07 Thread Sasa
Hi, I have a problem with Cisco 7906G and SIP protocol use with Asterisk 1.2.26. I have uploaded in my tftp server the firmware 'cmterm-7911_7906-sip.8-0-4SR1' that use 'SIP11.8-0-4SR1S.loads' and in SEPmacaddress.cnf.xml I have: loadInformationSIP11.8-0-4SR1S/loadInformation ..but in tftp

[asterisk-users] ISDN card freeze

2008-04-20 Thread Sasa
Hi, I use Asterisk 1.2.17 with BRIstuffed-0.3.0-PRE-1y-e (with Trixbox 2.2.12) and I have three ISDN card with chipset HFC on PCI slot, my problem is that after a inactivity period one o two isdn card are disconnected: asterisk1*CLI zap show status HFC-S PCI A ISDN card 0 [TE] layer 1 AC HFC-S

[asterisk-users] busy/congestion random

2008-01-15 Thread Sasa
Hi, I use: Trixbox-2.2.4 FreePBX-2.3.1.0 Asterisk-1.2.17 BRIstuffed-0.3.0-PRE-1y-e Zaptel-1.2.19 ..with two ISDN cards, often but occasionally the dial out failed but is possible to receive external call. My zapata.conf conf is: [trunkgroups] [channels] language=it context=from-pstn

Re: [asterisk-users] Fw: Remove a TDM Card

2007-11-30 Thread Sasa
Tzafrir Cohen wrote: New: loadzone=it defaultzone=it span=1,1,3,ccs,ami bchan=1,2 dchan=3 span=2,1,3,ccs,ami bchan=4-6 dchan=6 ..in zapata.conf I have: ; new part: switchtype=euroisdn signalling = bri_net priindication=outofband group = 1 channel = 1-2 group = 2 channel = 4-5

Re: [asterisk-users] Fw: Remove a TDM Card

2007-11-30 Thread Sasa
Tzafrir Cohen wrote: You have been quite short on details. For instance: what distribution of Linux? What version of Zaptel? Do you have another Zaptel card? It seems you either have two zaphfc cards or one dual-BRI card. If so, the procedure is slightly more complicated, as you basically

Re: [asterisk-users] Fw: Remove a TDM Card

2007-11-29 Thread Sasa
-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 1:50 AM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fw: Remove a TDM Card On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:59:22PM +0100, Sasa wrote: Hi, sorry but perhaps I don't have explained clearly my problem...now I have a box voip that must be replace with another

[asterisk-users] Fw: Remove a TDM Card

2007-11-28 Thread Sasa
Hi, sorry for my insistence but this is a big problem for me..my steps for remove card are ok ? Thanks. -- Salvatore. - Original Message - From: Sasa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 4:25 PM Subject: [asterisk-users] Remove

Re: [asterisk-users] Fw: Remove a TDM Card

2007-11-28 Thread Sasa
the card in. Bigger issue is getting around the renumbering of channels when you remove hardware at the bottom -- Salvatore. - Original Message - From: Sasa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 4:25 PM Subject: [asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Remove a TDM Card

2007-11-26 Thread Sasa
Hi, I would like remove a Digium TDM2400P from Asterisk (version 1.2.13) box but when I remove card from the PC after reboot Asterisk not started correctly. On box now with TDM Card I have: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# lsmod Module Size Used by zaphfc

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7940G licensing with asterisk

2007-10-01 Thread Sasa
Hi, also I have called Cisco suport to ask how to use SIP protocol on Cisco 7941G (and my Astersik), the their answer is the following: ..SIP Firmware for the 7941G phone only works with Call Manager 5.x. You must have CCM 5.x to use this firmware, is needeful to buy a CCM license for use

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7940G licensing with asterisk

2007-09-28 Thread Sasa
Hi, on 7941G is needful the Call Manager license, the firmware for SIP use is available (with login) on 7912 and 7940. Thanks. -- Salvatore. - Original Message - From: Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7940G licensing with asterisk

2007-09-27 Thread Sasa
Hi, sorry for my intrusion... I have the same problem with Cisco 7941G, can I do buy the the Smartnet registration also for 7941G or this license is available only for 7940G ? Thanks. -- Salvatore. - Original Message - From: Cory Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users

[Asterisk-Users] username/auth name mismatch

2006-06-15 Thread sasa
Hi, I have a asterisk/voip newbie and I am sorry if my quetion is banal. I used in my private LAN, Express Talk on Windows XP and Asterisk latest version on Fedora Core 4 , with this configuration in Express Talk Lines menu: Setting for Line: Default Line Settings Full 'friendly' Display Name: