[asterisk-users] IFTIME and timezones

2018-03-28 Thread martin f krafft
Hello, Considering we're in the apex of daylight savings time confusions worldwide, I was wondering if there's a way to make IFTIME() timespecs take timezone information. We have offices around the globe that are being handled by a common Asterisk instance, and it seems otherwise impossible to

[asterisk-users] Problem with rport (CGNAT) going from Linux kernel 3.16 to 4.9

2017-02-02 Thread martin f krafft
Hello, I operate an Asterisk server (v11.13.1) on Debian stable, and it's rock-solid. The other day, however, I accidentally upgraded the kernel from the stable 3.16.0 to 4.9.0. Subsequently, audio stopped working. Below you can find my analysis while running the 4.9.0 kernel. 888 is a simply

[asterisk-users] [sip] setvar not executed when call comes in via registry

2015-09-02 Thread martin f krafft
Hi, I have a line like register => 1yyy1:x...@sipconnect.sipgate.de/incoming in sip.conf, and a corresponding stanza (note especially the final setvar): [trunk-sipgate] type=peer qualify=yes insecure=invite language=de dtmfmode=rfc2833 host=sipconnect.sipgate.de

Re: [asterisk-users] [sip] setvar not executed when call comes in via registry

2015-09-02 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft <madd...@madduck.net> [2015-09-02 14:16 +0200]: > However, when a call comes in through the sipgate trunk and gets > routed to the in-trunk-sipgate context, the ${FOO} variable is not > set and thus not available from the dialplan. Thanks to [TK]-Fend

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk virtual hosting

2015-05-17 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Edwards asterisk@sedwards.com [2015-05-17 08:31 +0200]: While preprocessing could be called 'templating,' this may be confusing because Asterisk already as a configuration file feature called 'templates.' Fair point. Preprocessing it shall be. And you find

[asterisk-users] Asterisk virtual hosting

2015-05-16 Thread martin f krafft
Hello, I am in the peculiar situation to have to set up a PBX for two independent sites, but operated by the same entity. Yes, I could set up two VPSs and install Asterisk to each, put common stuff (e.g. conferencing setup) into Git and share between both using includes, but for various reasons

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk virtual hosting

2015-05-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Edwards asterisk@sedwards.com [2015-05-16 23:22 +0200]: I use a preprocessor (http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/unix/preprocessor/) to tailor dialplans and configuration files to each host based on the client (or project) and the hostname. Yeah sure, templating works,

[asterisk-users] Internal calls without voice transport

2014-07-28 Thread martin f krafft
Hey, we're experiencing a weird problem with Asterisk 1.8.13.1 (1:1.8.13.1~dfsg1-3+deb7). Calls that leave and enter Asterisk via a PBX (sipgate.de) work perfectly fine, almost 100% of the time. However, calls that are routed to sipgate.de, which then routes the call back to our Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] Internal calls without voice transport

2014-07-28 Thread martin f krafft
By chance, I managed to fig into this a bit and found the exact moment when audio stops. It is exactly the moment when the counterparty picks up and RTP debug output says: Got RTP packet from46.244.255.146:8058 (type 00, seq 000680, ts 340914880, len 000160) Sent RTP packet to

Re: [asterisk-users] Impromptu conferencing

2012-12-03 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Brandon B. bran...@brellsystems.com [2012.12.03.0132 +0100]: [all-inbound-for-999] ; inbound extension through a conference room exten = 999,1,MeetMeCount(999,COUNT-999); exten = 999,2,GotoIf($[${COUNT-999}=1]?10); exten = 999,3,Dial(SIP/99,999,G(6)); exten = 999,4,Hangup; exten

Re: [asterisk-users] Managing complex setups with Asterisk

2012-11-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Raj Mathur (राज माथुर) r...@linux-delhi.org [2012.11.16.1005 +0100]: Warning: Not a fan of using whitespace as semantic markup, so no Django this side. Fine with Perl or Java, though. As long as we can agree on using a database (i.e. no MySQL) or the filesystem (Git…), then the

[asterisk-users] Thankfully no longer with Puppet (was: Managing complex setups with Asterisk)

2012-11-15 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com [2012.11.08.1615 +0100]: My systems are already managed automatically, thankfully no longer with Puppet. ;) Just out of curiosity why do you say this? Sorry for the late reply, I don't want to go into this on the list, but if you are curious:

Re: [asterisk-users] Managing complex setups with Asterisk

2012-11-15 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Paul Belanger paul.belan...@polybeacon.com [2012.11.08.2304 +0100]: Either way, it sounds like you need to store your data some place and start building it out. To recap: given that Asterisk RealTime doesn't really provide anything more than real-time access to data (i.e. the data

Re: [asterisk-users] Impromptu conferencing

2012-11-08 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Administrator TOOTAI ad...@tootai.net [2012.11.08.0954 +0100]: Does anyone have a working example they would be willing to share? As said by James, you just have to transfer all parties in a conference room and then you call this conference. The scenario is usually that we are

Re: [asterisk-users] Managing complex setups with Asterisk

2012-11-08 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jeff LaCoursiere j...@sunfone.com [2012.11.07.2049 +0100]: Just to chime in, if you REALLY want multi-tenant, it is super easy and surprisingly efficient to use kernel level virtualization to run multiple instances of asterisk (and even FreePBX). We use LXC to do this. The host

Re: [asterisk-users] Impromptu conferencing

2012-11-08 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Administrator TOOTAI ad...@tootai.net [2012.11.08.1018 +0100]: For a 3 way conference, all those days phones are able to do this. Yeah, except I want Asterisk to handle that, not my phone (which might lose reception or run out of battery etc.). -- martin | http://madduck.net/ |

[asterisk-users] Managing complex setups with Asterisk

2012-11-07 Thread martin f krafft
Hello, we are finally going to redesign our Asterisk-Setup, which has grown quite complex. We have five sites with a total of 400 users, 15 SIP registrations and 3 IAX registrations. We do not use any VoIP-hardware, so it's all software-based. But we make heavy use of features, including

Re: [asterisk-users] Managing complex setups with Asterisk

2012-11-07 Thread martin f krafft
Can Asterisk do virtual hosting? While I want/need the sites to be hosted by the same instance (so that e.g. calls can be transferred easily), I don't want to have to name my peers [site1-john], and I want people to be able to SIP-dial j...@site1.example.org and j...@site2.example.org and trust

Re: [asterisk-users] Managing complex setups with Asterisk

2012-11-07 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com [2012.11.07.1831 +0100]: Peer names have to be distinct, this is just a fundamental design element of chan_sip. What a lot of people end up doing is instead of treating peers as people they treat them as devices. The peer name becomes the MAC address of

[asterisk-users] Impromptu conferencing

2012-11-07 Thread martin f krafft
Dear list, we would really like to be able to invite a third and fourth party to our current one-on-one call. At the moment, we have to agree to dial into MeetMe 10 minutes later, then make calls to the third parties, and hope it all works out. I have found a couple of examples on the Internet

Re: [asterisk-users] Managing complex setups with Asterisk

2012-11-07 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Paul Belanger paul.belan...@polybeacon.com [2012.11.07.2340 +0100]: What is your point of pain? Right now we do most of the configuration, provisioning, and system management outside of asterisk. My systems are already managed automatically, thankfully no longer with Puppet. ;) I

Re: [asterisk-users] Managing complex setups with Asterisk

2012-11-07 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Logan Bibby lo...@keobi.com [2012.11.08.0747 +0100]: What about just setting up a database which stores your data however you want then generate static files from that data or creating views for realtime (where appropriate)? Sure, I could do that. First, however, I would like to

Re: [asterisk-users] E65 fails registration, soft phone works

2009-09-19 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Luki lugos...@gmail.com [2009.09.19.0745 +0200]: sounds like the hiccup my E71 had once. I think the symptoms were identical. Changing the transport type from Auto to UDP solved the problem for me. The Auto setting worked, but only sometimes. Maybe the E65 is similar... I've tried

Re: [asterisk-users] E65 fails registration, soft phone works

2009-09-19 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Torintino T torinti...@hotmail.com [2009.09.19.1356 +0200]: Try to put qualify=yes. I had qualify=2000, but even with the default, the problem prevails. Thanks for taking the time to reply, -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ den stil verbessern, das heißt

[asterisk-users] E65 fails registration, soft phone works

2009-09-12 Thread martin f krafft
Hey folks, I am trying to get an E65 to connect to asterisk, and I would really appreciate a second set of eyes. The SIP dialog completes fine, but the phone subsequently says Registration failed. I am in a network that has what seems to be a SIP-capable NAT gateway, but the asterisk is

Re: [asterisk-users] feature keys no longer work after a call has been parked

2009-06-17 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jeff Peeler jpee...@digium.com [2009.06.16.1757 +0200]: Have you set the parkedcallreparking, parkedcalltransfers, and other associated options? Only parkext and parkpos and context. All others are left at their defaults. But of course this seems to be what I am looking for.

Re: [asterisk-users] Unable to use # as feature key prefix

2009-06-17 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com [2009.06.16.1656 +0200]: The problem is the Asterisk Read function. It is set to accept as many 0-9 and * as you want to throw at it, then stop on # or timeout. Unless you disable the # stops, you can't use # in features. I would strongly caution

[asterisk-users] feature keys no longer work after a call has been parked

2009-06-16 Thread martin f krafft
Hey folks, I can park a call with #70 after enabling that feature in features.conf. However, once I retrieve the call from the parking lot, #70 cannot be used to park it again. Worse yet, none of the keys defined in the featuremap work anymore, include blindxfer or automon. Any ideas what may be

[asterisk-users] Unable to use # as feature key prefix

2009-06-16 Thread martin f krafft
Hi folks, I was using the following featuremap: blindxfer = *1 disconnect = *9 atxfer = *2 parkcall = *7 automixmon = *0 and everything worked. Then the need arouse to use some features like automixmon during a conference, but MeetMet has the * key bound to the (admin) menu. Thus, in

Re: [asterisk-users] feature keys no longer work after a call has been parked

2009-06-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Doug Lytle supp...@drdos.info [2009.06.16.1142 +0200]: I can park a call with #70 after enabling that feature in features.conf. However, once I retrieve the call from the parking lot, #70 cannot be used to park it again. Worse yet, none of the You fail to mention the version of

Re: [asterisk-users] feature keys no longer work after a call has been parked

2009-06-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Doug Lytle supp...@drdos.info [2009.06.16.1314 +0200]: Please remember, the patch is for 1.4 Right, and I found the corresponding lines in 1.6. But there are more questions now: - snprintf(returnexten, sizeof(returnexten), %s||t, peername); + snprintf(returnexten,

[asterisk-users] Preventing MOH from restarting the tune when a call is parked

2009-06-13 Thread martin f krafft
Hi folks, When I try to park a call, my SIP phone puts the other party on hold and MOH starts to play a tune. I then dial 700 and wait for the parking slot announcement. As soon as the other party gets put into the parkinglot, the MOH tune starts again from the beginning. Is there a way to

[asterisk-users] line goes silent for a few seconds at the start of outgoing calls

2008-07-01 Thread martin f krafft
Hi there, I am experiencing a strange problem and am looking for advice to where to start looking. Or any clues, really. I have Asterisk running on our router, and it is configured to forward calls to a provider out there (who is also using Asterisk). On the inside of the Asterisk are several

[asterisk-users] SIP proxy screwing up peer addresses.

2008-03-31 Thread martin f krafft
rejection for user martin f. krafft sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=fipzt and SIP debugging then prints: OPTIONS sip:sip05.insphone.ch SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 84.75.148.xxx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK71785803;rport From: asterisk sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as05fc20f4 I am not calling as username asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] Two phones fail to agree on codec, asterisk at fault?

2008-03-29 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Brent Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.03.28.2149 +0100]: With canreinvite=no you are forcing asterisk to remain in the call path. As long as Asterisk is in the call path, it is supposed to be transcoding the calls, so it doesn't care what the compatible codecs are between then

[asterisk-users] Two phones fail to agree on codec, asterisk at fault?

2008-03-28 Thread martin f krafft
Hi list, I am faced by a situation where I am trying to make a softphone and a Siemens C450IP talk to each other. Both are hooked up directly to the same asterisk, in the same IP net. - a softphone runs on 192.168.14.3 - the C450IP is at 192.168.14.30 - asterisk runs on the machine known

[asterisk-users] recommendable softphones / X-Lite / Zoiper for amd64?

2008-03-28 Thread martin f krafft
Hi, I am on amd64 Linux and not really too happy with twinkle, linphone and ekiga. Unfortunately, X-Lite and Zoiper, even though they provide Linux versions (w00t!) have only x86 versions for download. Do you guys know of amd64 versions of those, or can you recommend other softphones that will

Re: [asterisk-users] recommendable softphones / X-Lite / Zoiper for amd64?

2008-03-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Tim Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.03.28.1637 +0100]: I may be missing something here... but won't a 32bit binary run just fine on a 64bit platform? Would you even see a performance increase or advantage to a 64bit soft phone versus a 32bit version? Not if all the libraries have