Well...Not sure whats causing it, and I haven't gotten to the box yet to
look at it, but this is the second time my newly built * box has just hung
without warnign or explanation. No IRQ sharing going on (i stole IRQ 3 and
4 after disabling the Com ports) with the TDM400P and T100P. Runs
Ah Sorry, * v 1.0.1, zaptel, libpri, also 1.0.
The box is an AMD XP1800+ w/ 1.5Gig RAM and a ASUS A7V266-E mainboard.
Like I said, previously solid performer.
IDE based drives...
This isnt' the permanent home, that hardware arrived earlier today while I
was out, I know it's a Supermicro
What is the configuration of the TDM400?
Port 1 -
Port 2 -
Port 3 -
Port 4 -
--
-M
There are 10 kinds of people in this world:
Those who can count in binary and those who cannot.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Got the same problem on a linux redhat 7.3 box
But everything hangs
Its also runs mail
You can ping it but cant connect on any port,not eve the gui
Michael George wrote:
What is the configuration of the TDM400?
Port 1 -
Port 2 -
Port 3 -
Port 4 -
1: FXS
2: FXS
3: none
4: none
--On Tuesday, October 12, 2004 07:18 -0400 Michael George
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the configuration of the TDM400?
Port 1 -
Port 2 -
Port 3 -
Port 4 -
___
Asterisk-Users mailing
Mine doesn't even Ping. Debian Woody 3.0 w/ a 2.4.25 kernel.
--On Tuesday, October 12, 2004 13:24 +0200 Altus Syman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got the same problem on a linux redhat 7.3 box
But everything hangs
Its also runs mail
You can ping it but cant connect on any port,not eve the gui
12, 2004 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] * box hangs after a couple of days...
1: FXS
2: FXS
3: none
4: none
--On Tuesday, October 12, 2004 07:18 -0400 Michael George
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the configuration of the TDM400?
Port 1 -
Port 2 -
Port 3 -
Port 4
. If i
reboot and leave * running then I have no problems.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Loftis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] * box hangs after a couple
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 12:02 -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
Well it's almost 100% sure that it's the zaptel drivers. Because I just
came back and the box's filesystem is hosed. Won't even boot now.
Hopefully I can get all my work back from /etc.
I'm really worried about putting Zaptel
Yup it's official, the box is now a brick thanks to the zaptel drivers.
What madness they're doing I have no idea, but the filesystems are all
pretty much corrupted, with the drives being totally fine, both sides of
the mirrored set which pretty much rules out the drives themselves.
Pending
--On Tuesday, October 12, 2004 13:15 -0500 Steven Critchfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You seem to have too much confidence in your raid setup. I'm wondering
if you are using a highpoint semi software raid since you have mentioned
an AMD machine and IDE drives. You probably are having IDE
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 20:23, Michael Loftis wrote:
Yup it's official, the box is now a brick thanks to the zaptel drivers.
What madness they're doing I have no idea, but the filesystems are all
pretty much corrupted, with the drives being totally fine, both sides of
the mirrored set which
You shouldn't be seeing these sorts of problems regardless of how the
zaptel drivers are performing. The kernel should panic and the system
halt if things go awry. If the system hard locks, that's almost always
a hardware issue of some sort.
What your problem sounds like is some conflict on
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 12:32 -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
--On Tuesday, October 12, 2004 13:15 -0500 Steven Critchfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You seem to have too much confidence in your raid setup. I'm wondering
if you are using a highpoint semi software raid since you have mentioned
--On Tuesday, October 12, 2004 20:32 +0200 Patrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 20:23, Michael Loftis wrote:
Yup it's official, the box is now a brick thanks to the zaptel drivers.
What madness they're doing I have no idea, but the filesystems are all
pretty much corrupted,
Hi Steven,
-Original Message-
You seem to have too much confidence in your raid setup. I'm
wondering if you are using a highpoint semi software raid
since you have mentioned an AMD machine and IDE drives. You
probably are having IDE problems arising from the number of
interupts
Hi Steven,
This mail and my first response did cross, so here are some additional
thoughts.
-Original Message-
Then you show how little you have learned about the hardware
and the system in general. ALL Zapata based hardware
generates 1000 interupts a second regardless of
- Non-Commercial Discussion
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] * box hangs after a couple of days...
--On Tuesday, October 12, 2004 13:15 -0500 Steven Critchfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You seem to have too much confidence in your raid
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 20:54 +0200, Florian Overkamp wrote:
Hi Steven,
-Original Message-
You seem to have too much confidence in your raid setup. I'm
wondering if you are using a highpoint semi software raid
since you have mentioned an AMD machine and IDE drives. You
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Steven Critchfield wrote:
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 12:32 -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
No I hate those highpoints. Using Standard IDE, the Promise 'RAID' is
disabled. We have a SCSI box here that's been purchased for the PBX
permanent home, but if this is how the
20 matches
Mail list logo
