It is probably a SPA-3000 problem. I have tried a similar setup (not for
911, I need to hangup a phone) and it works with ISDN phones and
Swisswoice SIP phone, but not with BudgetOne, for example. The phone
just won't drop the line for some reason. Hope this helps.
John Goerzen wrote:
Hi,
I
Hi,
I have a SPA-3000 and would like to use the 911 recipe from
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+tips+911. So I took the simple
recipe and modified it slightly:
exten = 911,1,ChanIsAvail(SIP/potsoutbound)
exten = 911,2,Dial(SIP/potsoutbound/911)
exten = 911,3,Hangup()
exten =
] On Behalf Of John Goerzen
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 6:38 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] 911 SoftHangup on SPA-3000
Hi,
I have a SPA-3000 and would like to use the 911 recipe from
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+tips+911. So I took the simple
recipe
Hi,
I am quite new to asterisk so I am not sure what is needed to figure
out this problem. If more information is needed and not provided I
will gladly provide it.
I have a very basic asterisk setup. 1 x100p card and a grandstream
handytone 286. I can make calls fine to most phone numbers from
Andrew,
can you post your extensions.conf to the list please?
Kyle
On Feb 2, 2005, at 2:15 PM, Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote:
Hi,
I am quite new to asterisk so I am not sure what is needed to figure
out this problem. If more information is needed and not provided I
will gladly provide it.
I have a
Fix your dial-plan in extensions.conf so that the first digit isn't
getting dropped.
If you're using a traditional dial plan, you press 9 to get out so
many default configs will drop the first digit when sending the string
out to the carrier. You appear to be getting outside without the 9 so
: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 3:15 PM
To: Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] 911 and Cops knocking on my door
Hi,
I am quite new to asterisk so I am not sure what is needed to figure
out this problem. If more information is needed and not provided I
will gladly provide it.
I have
On February 2, 2005 04:15 pm, Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote:
I can see why I think; 5 911 079. But I don't understand why it is
being handled this way. Can somebody offer me some guidance on how to
get this to stop?
Your FXO card missed the '5', that's all. Or maybe Asterisk did. Or maybe
Try dialing 591-2079 and see if you're trying to make a call to 91-2079
instead of 591-2079.
-m
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote:
Hi,
I am quite new to asterisk so I am not sure what is needed to figure
out this problem. If more information is needed and not provided I
will
looks like an ignorepat problem on the first *number* (single) dialed
(i.e., trying to ignore the number 9 on an outbound call.)
try to make a call to 591-2079.
-
Yeah, we rocked the vote all right. Those little
bastards betrayed us again.
-
post your dialplan from extensions.conf
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:15:28 -0700, Andrew Niemantsverdriet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am quite new to asterisk so I am not sure what is needed to figure
out this problem. If more information is needed and not provided I
will gladly provide it.
I
yep, post your conf.
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, AJ Grinnell wrote:
post your dialplan from extensions.conf
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:15:28 -0700, Andrew Niemantsverdriet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am quite new to asterisk so I am not sure what is needed to figure
out this problem. If more information is
Being a Newb I don't know how to look at my CDR, could you tell me.
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:21:10 -0500, Andrew Kohlsmith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On February 2, 2005 04:15 pm, Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote:
I can see why I think; 5 911 079. But I don't understand why it is
being handled this
I figured out how to view it. Here is what it says:
# cat /var/log/asterisk/cdr-csv/Master.csv | grep 911
,2000,5911079,from-sip-internal,Andrew Niemants
2000,SIP/2000-a509,Zap/1-1,Hangup,,2005-02-02
14:24:05,2005-02-02 14:24:08,2005-02-02
14:24:57,52,49,ANSWERED,DOCUMENTATION
So it looks to me
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:51:53 -0700, Andrew Niemantsverdriet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it looks to me like something else went wrong.
If you took your dial line right from the samples you likely still
have a ${EXTEN:{TRUNKMSD}}
That variable TRUNKMSD is probably stripping off the first digit.
Andrew,
What happens when you dial other numbers?
Is it stripped on those as well?
Can you look in your zapata.conf for stripmsd=1 ?
Kyle
On Feb 2, 2005, at 3:51 PM, Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote:
I figured out how to view it. Here is what it says:
# cat /var/log/asterisk/cdr-csv/Master.csv | grep
, June 16, 2004 8:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] 911 emergency service and VoIP
I understand that most VoIP providers allow for 911 calling but that 911
service is not the same as that available to PSTN.
From what I understand a 911 Call Will Go To A General Access Line
Joe Baptista wrote:
I understand that most VoIP providers allow for 911 calling but that 911
service is not the same as that available to PSTN.
From what I understand a 911 Call Will Go To A General Access Line at the
Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP). This is different from the 911
Emergency
On Thursday 17 June 2004 11:38, John Fraizer wrote:
If you have PRI service into your * server, it is possible - though not
always easy - to set the ALI database information specific for each ANI
(DID number) that you use. I do this with our PRI's. Depending on
which number we present to the
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Thursday 17 June 2004 11:38, John Fraizer wrote:
If you have PRI service into your * server, it is possible - though not
always easy - to set the ALI database information specific for each ANI
(DID number) that you use. I do this with our PRI's. Depending on
which
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
Do you have information on how to do this? This is *precisely* what I want to
do. I assumed you set this up with your telco and then set the caller ID to
the # matching the address you wanted, leaving the telco to do the address
match.
In discussions with my telco,
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
Do you have information on how to do this? This is *precisely* what I
want to do. I assumed you set this up with your telco and then set
the caller ID to the # matching the address you wanted, leaving the
telco to do the address match.
In
John Fraizer wrote:
Your telco really can't *prevent* you from doing PS/ALI. They don't
have to make it easy though. Even with PS/ALI, the same database is
updated. It's just you doing the update vs the telco doing it. Doing
things the Right Way TM isn't always easy but, in the end, it is
I understand that most VoIP providers allow for 911 calling but that 911
service is not the same as that available to PSTN.
From what I understand a 911 Call Will Go To A General Access Line at the
Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP). This is different from the 911
Emergency Response Center
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Joe Baptista wrote:
Does anyone know how I can get information on howto contact the people
at the Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs)? Is there alist somewhere
I can reference.
well, you could dial 911.. ;) But more seriously, I think I'd start by
calling the
-
From: Jonathan Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 and lawsuits and redundancy
This is esp true of any VoIP PBX system. In fact I think many of them run
Windows.
I do have a related question about how * users
, January 06, 2004 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 and lawsuits
ever notice the spec sheets from semiconductor manufacturers specifically
exclude the device from being used for medical applications ?
do something similar with asterisk - put a sticker on the box saying not
911 rated
My take on redundancy is to use a real server with disk mirroring and
redundant power supplies.
That's hardly redundant. What if you lose a disk controller? Or any part
of the motherboard? Or CPU? Power supplies can and have failed in ways
that manage to take out system components. :-)
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 09:31, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
My take on redundancy is to use a real server with disk mirroring and
redundant power supplies.
That's hardly redundant. What if you lose a disk controller? Or any part
of the motherboard? Or CPU? Power supplies can and have failed
SCSI controllers shouldn't get spooked by drive failures. Just choose
good controllers. This can be difficult as you find out that even
Adaptec has been known to have controllers that don't work well under
some loads in linux. Dell has a mailing list that basically is devoted
to the fixing of
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] 911 and lawsuits
Now imagine this person having his SIP phone in IOWA talking
to the the telephone switch in New York via VPN and dialing
911. The call will go to NYPD.
Why is it the theoretical VoIP user in such examples always seems
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 10:26, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
SCSI controllers shouldn't get spooked by drive failures. Just choose
good controllers. This can be difficult as you find out that even
Adaptec has been known to have controllers that don't work well under
some loads in linux. Dell has a
Quoting Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anyways, while hotswap PSUs may not be important, any machine that is
important is important enough for redundant supplies. It doesn't add
much to the cost of the case and is a good insurance policy.
--
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 18:55, Jonathan Moore wrote:
Quoting Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anyways, while hotswap PSUs may not be important, any machine that is
important is important enough for redundant supplies. It doesn't add
much to the cost of the case and is a good insurance
Parker
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 12:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 and lawsuits
It's just as well that here in Hong Kong employers don't have to worry
about being sued by their staff tripping over their own laces ; or
microwave oven manufacturers getting sued
Now imagine this person having his SIP phone in IOWA talking
to the the telephone switch in New York via VPN and dialing
911. The call will go to NYPD.
Why is it the theoretical VoIP user in such examples always seems to be from
Iowa or Nebraska? I feel compelled to state that not all people
Just curious if any of the Asterisk installers are doing anything special
to protect themselves from a possible lawsuit caused by 911 failure
during a Asterisk/computer crash?
I realize that any traditional PBX or even a phone line can fail but,
anything running on a computer is probably going to
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 10:56, Jim Flagg wrote:
Just curious if any of the Asterisk installers are doing anything special
to protect themselves from a possible lawsuit caused by 911 failure
during a Asterisk/computer crash?
I realize that any traditional PBX or even a phone line can fail but,
: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 5:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 and lawsuits
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 10:56, Jim Flagg wrote:
Just curious if any of the Asterisk installers are doing anything special
to protect themselves from a possible lawsuit caused by 911 failure
during
This is esp true of any VoIP PBX system. In fact I think many of them run Windows.
I do have a related question about how * users are creating redundancy in thier
setups? I am going live in a few days with a single office setup where I have
patched the * PBX in front of our existing legacy phone
ever notice the spec sheets from semiconductor manufacturers specifically
exclude the device from being used for medical applications ?
do something similar with asterisk - put a sticker on the box saying not
911 rated or something, use at your own risk.
I wouldn't be caught dead (well maybe I
It's just as well that here in Hong Kong employers don't have to worry about
being sued by their staff tripping over their own laces ; or microwave oven
manufacturers getting sued by old ladies drying off their poodle ; or
supermarket owners getting sued by stupid customers who trip over their own
- Original Message -
From: Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 and lawsuits
I realize that any traditional PBX or even a phone line can fail but,
anything running on a computer
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 and lawsuits and redundancy
This is esp true of any VoIP PBX system. In fact I think many of them run Windows.
Or VOIP
I would ask the same question about zero SLA Broadband Internet providers.
How could an Asterisk installers determine if the Broadband latency reached a
level
were the IP network was not available to a VoIP subscriber at time of a 911
call.
this is a log clip of a SIP UA connecting across a
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Jon Pounder wrote:
The phone does not have to necessarily be at the pbx either, it could be
brought out to the reception desk etc.
On Definity systems, we used a device called something like Emergency
Cut-over. When power from the switch was lost, the device threw a bunch
Jon Pounder wrote:
ever notice the spec sheets from semiconductor manufacturers specifically
exclude the device from being used for medical applications ?
As does Microsoft's standard software license. Don't use this for any
life-or-death application. (I believe medical and nuclear plant
quote who=Jim Flagg
Most business would have lots of cell phones around but in many metal building
they do not work. They also don't provide the address information that a
land line phone provides.
My company gets over the issue of the incorrect address information for the
true location of
The question wasn't that someone had problems with asterisk, but was
asking a question all consultants eventually have to think about. If you
touch someone else's hardware, you are now playing a risk game. The
risks are that you haven't clued your customer in fully on what to
expect and therefore
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 11:46, Jim Flagg wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 and lawsuits
I realize that any traditional PBX or even a phone line
FYI there is a way to do 911 its called E-911 enhanced 911
the user has to set it up with the local emergency services
to it and you setup your pbx to xmit the data.
Here is the fcc rule about it
http://www.fcc.gov/911/enhanced/
___
Asterisk-Users
In my opionion, right/wrong, courts would rule against any company
that provided fair warning to the customer of the possibility that
a system (pbx or otherwise) could fail, and some alternative form
(with employee training) of emergency services has been recommended.
Doing that verbally is not
FYI there is a way to do 911 its called E-911 enhanced 911
the user has to set it up with the local emergency services
to it and you setup your pbx to xmit the data.
There's PS/ALI (Private Switch Automatic Location Information) that's
quickly becoming state mandated for all PBX systems. The
- Original Message -
From: mike hjorleifsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:30 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] 911
FYI there is a way to do 911 its called E-911 enhanced 911
the user has to set it up with the local emergency services
I would like to know if anyone has come up with a script for 911 dialing
rules that put correct information on our locations. We have our office
in 3 different building one being our production shipping dock. It is
almost 2 blocks away. We are connected with Ethernet Wireless between
the
- Original Message -
From: Ariel Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk User List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 4:06 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] 911 settings.
I would like to know if anyone has come up with a script for 911 dialing
rules that put correct
At 5:26 PM -0500 12/19/03, Andrew Thompson wrote:
I would like to know if anyone has come up with a script for 911 dialing
rules that put correct information on our locations. We have our office
in 3 different building one being our production shipping dock. It is
almost 2 blocks away. We
Andrew Thompson wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ariel Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk User List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 4:06 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] 911 settings.
I would like to know if anyone has come up with a script for 911 dialing
rules
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Nick Bachmann wrote:
I don't know how big of a customer you are for your phone company, but
if you have more than a token number of lines they'll hopefully go for it.
Another option is to call the non-emergency number of the dispatch center
and explain this one
OK, that VOIP dialtone? thread was getting really out of hand, so
I'll condense my answers into one big ugly message:
1) 911 service. Yes, that is one of three reasons to keep your PSTN
line. The other two reasons are: Inbound calls from local callers
still should work on a POTS line, for
You risk hanging up on your other 911 callers... but everything is
always a tradeoff.
In my experience, the 911 dispatcher can (does) pin the call, so that
even though the remote side hangs up, the line is not available for use
again until the dispatcher releases it. I'd expect this to mean
That would be the case if calls are dropped at random to clear the way
for 911 calls. With some form of access control (NCOS, Calling Search
Space/Partitions, priority levels) you would be able to drop the least
important calls.
BTW, how are trunk restrictions managed right now? How can I
make a context for l/d dialing and include it for the phones / times of
day, when it is actually supposed to be used, not otherwise.
At 09:52 AM 6/24/2003 -0600, you wrote:
That would be the case if calls are dropped at random to clear the way for
911 calls. With some form of access control
Problem: 911 calls placed through Asterisk are associated with the
physical location of where the CO trunks terminate. This is not really a
problem when all extensions are located in the same building, but when
Asterisk is used in a campus-like or otherwise networked environment, it
can get
I'm not sure I can parse your examples correctly. I'm not being
snide, but do you use Asterisk on a regular basis? Do you understand
how applications work, and how call handoff is done between Asterisk
servers? Your example doesn't seem to make sense, no matter how I
think about it.
Of
Now that I reed it back, I can barely make sense of it myself! Anyway, I
was just thinking out loud, the example wasn't meant to be parsed.
Asterisk would need some lower level changes to parse the extra field
holding the location information, and to apply the routing rules to
substitute the
Dylan VanHerpen wrote:
Now that I reed it back, I can barely make sense of it myself! Anyway,
I was just thinking out loud, the example wasn't meant to be parsed.
Asterisk would need some lower level changes to parse the extra field
holding the location information, and to apply the routing
And now that I *read* it back again, you can tell that English is not my
native language either
Dylan VanHerpen wrote:
Now that I reed it back, I can barely make sense of it myself!
Anyway, I was just thinking out loud, the example wasn't meant to be
parsed. Asterisk would need some lower
Problem: 911 calls placed through Asterisk are associated with the
physical location of where the CO trunks terminate. This is not really a
problem when all extensions are located in the same building, but when
Asterisk is used in a campus-like or otherwise networked environment, it
can get
Also, it isn't very easy to 'test' either, as the staff at the 911 call
centre won't appreciate your testing, and at least in Australia, it is some
sort of criminal?/illegal offence to call emergency for non-emergency
situations.
I had much the same thoughts. Currently my 911 code is just
Jon Pounder wrote:
I had much the same thoughts. Currently my 911 code is just commented
out for that very reason - I don't want to get in trouble for
accidentally making 911 calls to test it. Should I rely on that code
untested for when it is really needed most ? What are other people doing ?
Also, it isn't very easy to 'test' either, as the staff at the 911 call
centre won't appreciate your testing, and at least in Australia, it is some
sort of criminal?/illegal offence to call emergency for non-emergency
situations.
Well, for testing purposes 911 could be replaced with any other
Also, it isn't very easy to 'test' either, as the staff at the 911 call
centre won't appreciate your testing, and at least in Australia, it is
some
sort of criminal?/illegal offence to call emergency for non-emergency
situations.
I had much the same thoughts. Currently my 911 code is just
Bumping calls to clear a path for 911 is possible within Asterisk
already - see the SoftHangup application.
That sounds good, but what can trigger the SoftHangup app to drop other
calls automatically when 911 is dialed?
A short AGI script, perhaps?
It probably would not even require a short
101 - 174 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
