Re: [Asterisk-Users] I guess my server capacity is ok

2006-06-01 Thread Goke Aruna
Butalek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:10 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] I guess my server capacity is ok What process is taking up 100% CPU? Is it Asterisk processes

Re: [Asterisk-Users] I guess my server capacity is ok

2006-06-01 Thread Woodoo People .pGa!
Which DSP based boards does Asterisk support for G729 and are any of these more cost effective than piling on Pentiums? There are none at this time. BTW: Can AMD CPUs handle a higher G729 load in 64 bit mode? Yes. The G.729 codec we distribute is marginally (6-7%) faster on AMD64 in

Re: [Asterisk-Users] I guess my server capacity is ok

2006-05-31 Thread Goke Aruna
30, 2006 10:10 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] I guess my server capacity is ok What process is taking up 100% CPU? Is it Asterisk processes or something else? Also, is the load spread out over multiple processes, or do you have one or two

Re: [Asterisk-Users] I guess my server capacity is ok

2006-05-31 Thread Steve Totaro
Message- From: Lachek Butalek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:10 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] I guess my server capacity is ok What process is taking

Re: [Asterisk-Users] I guess my server capacity is ok

2006-05-31 Thread Henry J. Cobb
All I know is that it is very processor intensive and either not using it or just passing it through is your best bet. I will be working alot with G729 in the near future and will post my findings but until then I am just relying on the dimensioning page on the wiki. Thanks, Steve Totaro

Re: [Asterisk-Users] I guess my server capacity is ok

2006-05-31 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Henry J. Cobb wrote: Which DSP based boards does Asterisk support for G729 and are any of these more cost effective than piling on Pentiums? There are none at this time. BTW: Can AMD CPUs handle a higher G729 load in 64 bit mode? Yes. The G.729 codec we distribute is marginally (6-7%)

Re: [Asterisk-Users] I guess my server capacity is ok

2006-05-31 Thread Goke Aruna
problem. Thanks, Steve Totaro http://www.asteriskhelpdesk.com -Original Message- From: Lachek Butalek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:10 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] I guess my

Re: [Asterisk-Users] I guess my server capacity is ok

2006-05-31 Thread Bruce Reeves
AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] I guess my server capacity is ok What process is taking up 100% CPU? Is it Asterisk processes or something else? Also, is the load spread out over multiple processes, or do you have one or two

[Asterisk-Users] I guess my server capacity is ok

2006-05-30 Thread Goke Aruna
can someone overthere help?the server specs are as follows HP DL380G4 Dual Intel Xeon 3.2GHz processor with 4GB RAM, running fedora core 3 asterisk-1.2.5 ss7-0.8.3d. using sip as advised to receive calls from another gateway in US. using g729 in transcoding way. however, I noticed the call hit

Re: [Asterisk-Users] I guess my server capacity is ok

2006-05-30 Thread Lachek Butalek
What process is taking up 100% CPU? Is it Asterisk processes or something else? Also, is the load spread out over multiple processes, or do you have one or two processes taking up 90% or more of your total? You also have dual CPUs (and hyperthreading, which to FC3 should look like 4 CPUs if I'm

RE: [Asterisk-Users] I guess my server capacity is ok

2006-05-30 Thread Steve Totaro
G729 is your problem. Thanks, Steve Totaro http://www.asteriskhelpdesk.com -Original Message- From: Lachek Butalek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:10 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] I guess my