On Monday 30 May 2005 03:38, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> 334,147,0 and 334,146,0 are practically the same. As for 334,0,0:
> Maybethe second patter was missed? I have the same problem here.
Yeah I was thinking the same thing; Does the distinctive ring code have any
kind of filtering (say round each pa
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 09:03:29AM +1000, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> On 5/29/05, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 06:34:23AM +1000, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> [snip]
> > > If Asterisk allowed me to configure up to 10 ringing patterns, I could
> > > probably cover most
On 5/29/05, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 06:34:23AM +1000, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
[snip]
> > If Asterisk allowed me to configure up to 10 ringing patterns, I could
> > probably cover most of the ringing patterns being detected, but
> > unfortunately there is a l
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 06:34:23AM +1000, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've recently got a "second" number installed on my PSTN line,
> trusting the Asterisk distinctive ring detection would work as
> expected. It appeared to work fine at the start, as the second number
> generated a differ
On 5/28/05, Jay Milk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you configure your "normal ring" to be recognized as a distinctive
> ring and go into a different context? That would essentially allow you
> to distinguish between the calls.
Excellent suggestion Jay! Thanks!! I changed the default context
ay 27, 2005 3:34 PM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Wacko Distinctive Ring Patterns
> being detected??
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've recently got a "second" number installed on my PSTN
> line, trusting the Asterisk distinctive
Hi All,
I've recently got a "second" number installed on my PSTN line,
trusting the Asterisk distinctive ring detection would work as
expected. It appeared to work fine at the start, as the second number
generated a different ring pattern to 0,0,0 (in the console) only to
realise that almost every
