No, there are no visible errors. We performed several simulation tests in
our lab to debug the problem. Every time there was jitter in the simulated
network the card was dropping audio samples and the voice was illegible.
I am wondering if anyone tested Digium in such conditions.
--
...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Grzegorz Garlewicz
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 2:55 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Sangoma transcoding card bug - drops audio samples
There is a serious bug in Sangoma transcoding cards. The card has an internal,
small
*Sent:* Friday, November 22, 2013 2:55 AM
*To:* asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
*Subject:* [asterisk-users] Sangoma transcoding card bug - drops audio
samples
There is a serious bug in Sangoma transcoding cards. The card has an
internal, small jitter buffer and it drops samples
from
There is a serious bug in Sangoma transcoding cards. The card has an
internal, small jitter buffer and it drops samples
from the audio stream when there is high jitter in the network. The
bandwidth is cheap now so for me the only reason
to use transcoding is where I have low-bandwidth-high-jitter
Hello,
Anyone out there knows the steps to get a Sangoma UT50 or UT51 VoiceTimer
USB stick working with an OpenVZ instance of Asterisk?
I have Dahdi + UT50 driver installed on mother node running fine but not
sure what to do in OpenVZ which has Asterisk installed. Do I have to
install Dahdi on
- solved -
it turned out that libpri was not compiled correctly...
and... Asgars comment about group systax is correct.
thx
regards,
yves
Am 13.05.2013 13:21, schrieb Yves A.:
that was the syntax before 1.8 or 11.x I think...
what about pseudo?
yves
Am 13.05.2013 13:16, schrieb Asghar
Hi,
I migrated from asterisk 1.6 to 11.3.
The Server has a Sangoma A104 quadPri card installed. OS is a fresh
installed Ubuntu 12.04 64bit
libpri, dahdi etc. all latest releases..
Sangoma says... driver is compatible with ANY asterisk version...
I tried driver 3.5.8... Setup ended with
We have had challenges with the latest kernel versions on Ubuntu and sangoma
wanpipe drivers
An older kernel - no problem, latest ones, sometime risky. There are release
notes on their site stating the supported versions so it might pay to check that
But if it compiled ok it might be something
mmh... actually supportline is closed...
why proceeds the call to dahdi/pseudo-??
i have never seen this before...
thx.,
yves
Am 13.05.2013 11:42, schrieb Duncan Turnbull:
We have had challenges with the latest kernel versions on Ubuntu and sangoma
wanpipe drivers
An older kernel - no
Dial(DAHDI/i0/number, is it not Dial(DAHDI/r0/number or Dial(DAHDI/R0/number
or Dial(DAHDI/g0/number or Dial(DAHDI/G0/number?
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Yves A. yves...@gmx.de wrote:
mmh... actually supportline is closed...
why proceeds the call to dahdi/pseudo-??
i have never
that was the syntax before 1.8 or 11.x I think...
what about pseudo?
yves
Am 13.05.2013 13:16, schrieb Asghar Mohammad:
Dial(DAHDI/i0/number, is it not Dial(DAHDI/r0/number or
Dial(DAHDI/R0/number or Dial(DAHDI/g0/number or Dial(DAHDI/G0/number?
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Yves A.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
- Original Message -
I have installed and configures this card in asterisk 1.6. When
trying to load the module codec_sangoma.so I see the following in
the asterisk log.
[2012-06-04 15:50:31] WARNING[18168]
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Eric Wieling ewiel...@nyigc.com wrote:
Has anyone experienced an issue with Sangoma analog cards where the card
suddenly stops working? Trying to dial out shows the channel as busy, even
though there is no active call on that port?
I'd like to see the output
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Sangoma Card Issue
Has anyone experienced an issue with Sangoma analog cards where the card
suddenly stops working? Trying to dial out shows the channel as busy, even
though there is no active call on that port?
This happened to us often
On 06/06/2012 09:46 AM, Eric Wieling wrote:
For some reason 1.4.4.x was not reading chan_dahdi.conf. When I symlinked it
to zapata.conf it worked.
That means Asterisk (1.4.4.x?) was built against Zaptel, not DAHDI.
--
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber:
I have installed and configures this card in asterisk 1.6. When trying to
load the module codec_sangoma.so I see the following in the asterisk log.
[2012-06-04 15:50:31] WARNING[18168] loader.c: Error loading module
'codec_sangoma.so': /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_sangoma.so: undefined
symbol:
- Original Message -
I have installed and configures this card in asterisk 1.6. When
trying to load the module codec_sangoma.so I see the following in
the asterisk log.
[2012-06-04 15:50:31] WARNING[18168] loader.c: Error loading module
'codec_sangoma.so':
Has anyone experienced an issue with Sangoma analog cards where the card
suddenly stops working? Trying to dial out shows the channel as busy, even
though there is no active call on that port?
This happened to us often when we used Digium cards (in fact this issue is why
we stopped using
Post more regarding your hardware and software configuration.
Andrew McRory
Sayso Communications, Inc.
2850 Industrial Plaza
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Office) 850-224-5737
Mobile) 850-778-3206
On 5/30/2012 2:34 PM, Eric Wieling wrote:
Has anyone experienced an issue with Sangoma analog cards
On 5/30/2012 2:34 PM, Eric Wieling wrote:
Has anyone experienced an issue with Sangoma analog cards where the card
suddenly stops working? Trying to dial out shows the channel as busy, even
though there is no active call on that port?
This happened to us often when we used Digium cards (in
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 02:34:55PM -0400, Eric Wieling wrote:
Has anyone experienced an issue with Sangoma analog cards where
the card suddenly stops working? Trying to dial out shows the
channel as busy, even though there is no active call on that port?
This happened to us often when we
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma Card Issue
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 02:34:55PM -0400, Eric Wieling wrote:
Has anyone experienced an issue with Sangoma analog cards where the
card suddenly stops working? Trying to dial out shows the channel as
busy, even though
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 04:35:25PM -0400, Eric Wieling wrote:
I did not mean to imply that we had issues with current Digium
cards, but re-reading my original message, I can see how I might
have given that impression.
Ahh, ok. Then that makes sense.
--
Shaun Ruffell
Digium, Inc. | Linux
Hi Team,
i have been facing issues with sangoma card with 16 E1.
used LibSS7
asterisk 1.6
with 8 E1 the links are stable , but moment i add another card of 8 E1 for
to support 16 E1. link keeps fluctuating
any idea why ?
Please help
Thanks
Vinod Dharashive
--
Hi Team,
i have been facing issues with sangoma card with 16 E1.
used LibSS7
asterisk 1.6
with 8 E1 the links are stable , but moment i add another card of 8 E1
for to support 16 E1. link keeps fluctuating
any idea why ?
Your 16th channel may be mismatched with the network.
Sender: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
To: asterisk-user
ReplyTo: asterisk-user
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma Card with 16E1 SS7 signaling
Sent: Oct 27, 2011 9:33 PM
Hi Team,
i have been facing issues with sangoma card with 16 E1.
used LibSS7
asterisk 1.6
with 8 E1 the links
Am 27.10.2011 19:29, schrieb Vinod Dharashive:
Hi Richard,
The link is up on 16 th channel. My objective is to have 16 E1 to be
configure on single machine with two 8 port sangoma card. Which is problem I
am facing. Please let me know if you have any solution.
Thanks
Vinod dharashive
Hi Team,
i have been facing issues with sangoma card with 16 E1.
used LibSS7
asterisk 1.6
with 8 E1 the links are stable , but moment i add another card of 8
E1
for to support 16 E1. link keeps fluctuating
any idea why ?
Your 16th channel may be mismatched
Hi stefan,
Do you have any configuration file for 16 E1 of system.conf and wanpipeX.conf.
Can u please share with me.
Thanks
Vinod dharashive.
--Original Message--
From: Stefan Schmidt
To: vdharash...@gmail.com
To: asterisk-user
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma Card with 16E1 SS7
: Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma Card with 16E1 SS7 signaling
Sent: Oct 27, 2011 11:34 PM
Hi Team,
i have been facing issues with sangoma card with 16 E1.
used LibSS7
asterisk 1.6
with 8 E1 the links are stable , but moment i add another card of 8
E1
for to support 16 E1. link
On 10/27/2011 08:57 PM, Vinod Dharashive wrote:
Hi Richard,
Thanks for reply, how can I identify clocking issues on card. Manually calls
goes successfully on both the card. After 10 min signaling links goes down.
Since you have a Sangoma card why don't you ask Sangoma support instead
of
-user
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma Card with 16E1 SS7 signaling
Sent: Oct 28, 2011 3:43 AM
On 10/27/2011 08:57 PM, Vinod Dharashive wrote:
Hi Richard,
Thanks for reply, how can I identify clocking issues on card. Manually calls
goes successfully on both the card. After 10 min
Dear Mr.Shokei
Salam
as I heard, some HP servers are very sensitive, about the os, you must
install the os only from the included cd and smart drive.
best
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Moises Silva moises.si...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:01 PM, M Shokuie sena...@gmail.com
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:01 PM, M Shokuie sena...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear folks,
We have recently installed A400D card with 12 FXO modules, the serer is HP
DL180 G6, cards works fine but after a while all the calls get an awful
noise, you can not get what each side says. The noise cleares as
Dear folks,
We have recently installed A400D card with 12 FXO modules, the serer is HP
DL180 G6, cards works fine but after a while all the calls get an awful
noise, you can not get what each side says. The noise cleares as soon as we
restart wanrouter but not asterisk (i mean asterisk restart
Hey Guys!
We had echo issue before so we replaced old PRI card with Sangoma A102D HWEC.
Now my question is i set rx/txgain level 0.0 default do i need to touch this
value or default is best. I have read on google and people say it should around
14844 on ztmonitor for rx/tx level same.
I
On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:50 PM, satish patel wrote:
We had echo issue before so we replaced old PRI card with Sangoma
A102D HWEC. Now my question is i set rx/txgain level 0.0 default do
i need to touch this value or default is best. I have read on google
and people say it should around 14844
Hi,
I have Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI
Express ) Card installed on the box. *Its not detected.* Details are as
below :-
[root@asterisk ~]# lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS480 Host Bridge (rev 01)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc
Apr 2011 19:38:06 +0530
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo
Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card
Hi,
I have Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI
Express ) Card installed on the box. Its
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:07 PM, satish patel satish...@hotmail.com wrote:
Try dmesg command
root@:~# dmesg | grep -i Sangoma
[ 2303.473601] WANPIPE(tm) Hardware Support Module 3.5.19.0 (c) 1994-2010
Sangoma Technologies Inc
[ 2303.481115] WANPIPE(tm) Interface Support Module 3.5.19.0
3.5.19.0 (c) 1994-2010 Sangoma
Technologies Inc
[ 2303.525334] WANPIPE(tm) WANEC Layer 3.5.19.0 (c) 1995-2006 Sangoma
Technologies Inc.
From: kaushalshri...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:38:06 +0530
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Sangoma A101DE 1
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:07 PM, satish patel satish...@hotmail.com wrote:
Try dmesg command
root@:~# dmesg | grep -i Sangoma
[ 2303.473601] WANPIPE(tm) Hardware Support Module 3.5.19.0 (c) 1994-2010
Sangoma Technologies Inc
[ 2303.481115] WANPIPE(tm) Interface Support Module
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:07 PM, satish patel satish...@hotmail.comwrote:
Try dmesg command
root@:~# dmesg | grep -i Sangoma
[ 2303.473601] WANPIPE(tm) Hardware Support Module 3.5.19.0 (c) 1994-2010
Sangoma
I'd say boot with ubuntu livecd and run lspci command.
Make sure your card back side LED working.
--
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 13, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Kaushal Shriyan
kaushalshri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com
wrote:
On Wed, Apr
-group.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma wapipe installation error
Try:
cd /usr/src/dahdi
./Setup dahdi
That's it.
Am 22.03.2011 21:06, schrieb satish patel:
Try:
cd /usr/src/dahdi
./Setup dahdi
That's it.
Am 22.03.2011 21:06, schrieb satish patel:
Hey!
I am installing Sangoma A102D wanpipe driver and i got following
error. what is this ? why dir isn't there ?
root@example:/usr/local/src/asterisk/wanpipe-3.5.19#
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:28:25 +0100
From: t...@ovm-group.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma wapipe installation error
Try:
cd /usr/src/dahdi
./Setup dahdi
Hey Guy,
I have ubuntu 10.04 64bit and compiled dahdi / wanpipe 3.5.19 /asterisk-1.8.x
I didn't understand what is the relation between wanpipe and dahdi ? do i
need to start wanrouter service ? I am getting weird errors and my system got
kernel panic many time when i restart dahdi
-users@lists.digium.com
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:56:42 +
Subject: [asterisk-users] Sangoma A102D wanpiple issue with dahdi
Hey Guy,
I have ubuntu 10.04 64bit and compiled dahdi / wanpipe 3.5.19 /asterisk-1.8.x
I didn't understand what is the relation between wanpipe and dahdi ? do i
Hey!
I am installing Sangoma A102D wanpipe driver and i got following error. what is
this ? why dir isn't there ?
wanpipe-3.5.16 # make dahdi DAHDI_DIR=/usr/src/dahdi
wanpipe-3.5.16 # make install
Send
Installing Wanpipe Firmware update utility in /etc/wanpipe/util/wan_aftup
Am 03.03.2011 16:02, schrieb satish patel:
Hey Guy,
I have quick question. I am purchasing Sangoma A102D card but i am
confused between PCI and PCI Express. Which card would be good for
me.
Definitely PCI Express is advance but i
PCI Express is always good also it take less power and faster when compare
to PCI in interupts .
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Thorsten Göllner t...@ovm-group.com wrote:
Am 03.03.2011 16:02, schrieb satish patel:
Hey Guy,
I have quick question. I am purchasing Sangoma A102D card but i am
Hey Guy,
I have quick question. I am purchasing Sangoma A102D card but i am confused
between PCI and PCI Express. Which card would be good for me.
Definitely PCI Express is advance but i just want to know is there any major
difference, like quality, performance etc..
-Satish
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Roi Stork roi.st...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's the messages log. There's a line that says ERROR: Unsupported DS E1
CHIP (00:00)
That's pretty bad. Could you post the output of wanrouter hwprobe verbose
?
Moises Silva
Senior Software Engineer
Sangoma Technologies
Here's the messages log. There's a line that says ERROR: Unsupported DS E1
CHIP (00:00)
Feb 14 10:09:19 server14 kernel: [6011515.237242] dahdi: Telephony Interface
Registered on major 196
Feb 14 10:09:19 server14 kernel: [6011515.237246] dahdi: Version: 2.4.0
Feb 14 10:09:19 server14 kernel:
Try to check your kernel version as per the wiki.sangoma.com website. I hope
that will solve your issue.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Roi Stork roi.st...@gmail.com wrote:
Trying to install wanpipe 3.5.18.
No errors during compile. But when I reach the point where wanpipe and
dahdi_cfg
As the error suggest, try checking /var/log/messages for possible hints on
what went wrong.
Make sure you configured the device with wancfg_dahdi script first.
Moises Silva
Senior Software Engineer
Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 100 Renfrew Drive, Suite 100, Markham ON L3R 9R6
Canada
t. 1 905 474
Trying to install wanpipe 3.5.18.
No errors during compile. But when I reach the point where wanpipe and
dahdi_cfg is started, I encountered an error.
Starting WAN Router...
Loading WAN drivers: wanpipe done.
Starting up device: wanpipe1
wanconfig: WAN device wanpipe1 driver load failed
Hi,
I am facing an audio-problem with the dial application and I (!) think,
that it is connected to the dahdi parameter overlapdial=yes. Sangoma
support does not see any connection between this. But when enabling this
option I face with some(!) dial-partners a audio one-way issue (the
called
Hi Bruce,
On 01/03/2011 06:03 AM, Bruce B wrote:
Thanks for the input. The errors I pointed out should be available in
the /var/log/messages or messages.1 .2 .3 etc...or in dmesg each time
you reboot the machine.
I have just rebooted the server and can confirm that neither dmesg,
On 01/03/2011 11:20 AM, Bruce B wrote:
Thanks a lot for that Sebastian. I will report back my findings when I
find the resolution on this.
I'm a bit late here, but I can say that Sangoma support has always been
extremely helpful when I call them. If you haven't already, definitely
give them
Thanks for the input. I have the latest drivers but it seems that there is
some serious incompatibility issue with the kernel as when the FLASHING
happens even if the system is restarted it's still not detected. One has to
re-plug it in and then it shows in wanrouter hwprobe.
It could also be
Hi Bruce,
On 12/28/2010 10:51 PM, Bruce B wrote:
Thanks for the input. I can not replicate the situation as it happens
randomely or maybe over the weekend. However I have sent you all the
requested command and logs in a separate e-mail for your analyzes. The
only thing that stood out at me was
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Bruce B bruceb...@gmail.com wrote:
I appreciate your feedback and let me know what info I can post here that
may help resolve the issue (such as output from dmesg or lspci?).
Hi Bruce,
The following would be useful for starters:
1. cat /etc/wanpipe/*.conf
Thanks for the input. I can not replicate the situation as it happens
randomely or maybe over the weekend. However I have sent you all the
requested command and logs in a separate e-mail for your analyzes. The only
thing that stood out at me was the output of lsusb -v at the very end
where it
Hello
I recently heard this should be possible. Has anyone experience with this?
Thanks!
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Nyamul Hassan mnhas...@usa.net wrote:
While this is too many eggs in one basket, but can be useful if you have
too many E(T)1s say equivalent to a STM1 (OC3) or more. In that case, it
would be too many boxes at 8ports / box.
Somewhere in the mailing list,
Thank you for your info Moises. For those who want to have a high density
system, can you provide what modifications to the Dahdi (or anything else)
do you make?
Regards
HASSAN
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 19:39, Moises Silva moises.si...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Nyamul
Those modifications are done via regular Sangoma installation with a special
option to the Setup script.
http://wiki.sangoma.com/wanpipe-linux-asterisk-appendix#zaptel_adjustable_chunk_sz
http://www.sangoma.com/assets/docs/misc/2009_10_09_How_to_Reduce_Asterisk_System_Loads.pdf
Moises Silva
Hi
Does Sangoma 8-port card A108 support PCIe version 2.0 ?
The cards is here
And we want to use 3 such cards in this motherboard because it has 3 PCIe
slots of version 2.0
http://www.intel.com/products/desktop/motherboards/DX58SO/DX58SO-overview.htm
Is this a good idea ? Do you have any
Hi
Does Sangoma 8-port card A108 support PCIe version 2.0 ?
The card is here
http://www.sangoma.com/products/hardware_products/digital_voice_and_data_networking/a108.html
And we want to use 3 such cards in this motherboard because it has 3 PCIe
slots of version 2.0
Anita Hall wrote:
Hi
Does Sangoma 8-port card A108 support PCIe version 2.0 ?
Ask Sangoma They are very helpful
The card is here
http://www.sangoma.com/products/hardware_products/digital_voice_and_data_networking/a108.html
And we want to use 3 such cards in this motherboard because it
i suppose that depends on the number of eggs and baskets you have... but i'm
guessing not many of either since you're considering using a desktop board
for this...
but, email sangoma support, they will tell you.
On 17 September 2010 12:47, John Novack jnov...@stromberg-carlson.orgwrote:
Geraint Lee wrote:
i suppose that depends on the number of eggs and baskets you have...
but i'm guessing not many of either since you're considering using a
desktop board for this...
24 T1 ports, if my math is correct.
Lots of eggs for any PC, desktop or not!
Lots of circuits/channels to go
While this is too many eggs in one basket, but can be useful if you have
too many E(T)1s say equivalent to a STM1 (OC3) or more. In that case, it
would be too many boxes at 8ports / box.
Somewhere in the mailing list, Sangoma devs said that they do 32E(T)1 per
box on the labs quite frequently,
Hi,
I have several 1.4.29 installations with Sangoma AFT101d cards. Normally
we have been collecting the raw data and then graphing channel use for
these customers with:
asterisk -rx 'show channels' | cut -f1 -d' ' | grep Zap | sort -u | wc -l
Then I recently noticed that there were some
...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
LaCoursiere
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 11:41 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Sangoma - how to show channels in use?
Hi,
I have several 1.4.29 installations with Sangoma AFT101d cards. Normally
we have been collecting the raw
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Sangoma - how to show channels in use?
Hi,
I have several 1.4.29 installations with Sangoma AFT101d cards. Normally
we have been collecting the raw data and then graphing channel use for
these customers with:
asterisk -rx 'show
Hi Guys,
Anyone might know why this error keeps showing up and inbound/outbound is
not working on a Bell PRI with Sangoma A101D?
-- Got SABME from network peer.
Sending Unnumbered Acknowledgement
No calls can be made inbound/outbound.
Keeps repeating. No alarms ON and no changes been made to
- bruce bruce bruceb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
Anyone might know why this error keeps showing up and inbound/outbound is not
working on a Bell PRI with Sangoma A101D?
-- Got SABME from network peer.
Sending Unnumbered Acknowledgement
No calls can be made inbound/outbound.
Hello,
I've recently bought a new Sangoma A104d PCI-card.
WANPIPE release is 3.4.7.
Machine is a dual Xeon with Debian 5.0.3.
Asterisk is 1.6.11 with recent libpri and dahdi.
When I boot the machine (including hardware and wanpipe
and dahdi drivers) and start asterisk, everthing runs
fine for
Hi,
mea maxima culpa.
I've found the cause, however Sangoma card and driver
are working excellent.
Just for the archive, to help someone else, maybe having the
same problem:
In order to test my system before bringing it to the data
center, I plugged in a loop cable. Therefore I had to
switch
Thanks a lot for that info Christian.
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:14:02 +0100
From: Christian Victor christ...@victormedia.de
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma A101DE with Dell PE 2850
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Hi friends, I am about to install an asterisk server using a Sangoma A101DE
over a Dell PE 2850 Server but I have doubts about PCI requirements.
First I see at sangoma page that A101DE is PCI-Express (I think x1 for the
size of the connector)
And the specs for the PE 2850 is
For PCI-X
2009/12/8 Ricardo Melendez rmelen...@utep.com.mx:
First I see at sangoma page that A101DE is PCI-Express (I think x1 for the
size of the connector)
Yes, it is PCIe x1. There is an A101D wich is PCI(-X).
for PCI Express
one x4 lane width
one x8 lane width
I can connect the card to any
I am having problems trying to get a Sangoma U100 USB FXO adapter working
with Asterisk. After all the configuration Asterisk (1.6.2.0-rc2) detects the
port and I can even call in without a problem (after making sure no echo
canceller is configured for that channel). The problem is that
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 3:33 AM, M Shokuie sena...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Folks,
Anyone knows if Sangoma supports or going to provide support for battery
removal detection on FXO lines?? As Tzafrir said earlier DAHDI supports it,
which is a very nice feature but what about Sangoma?
Regards.
Dear Folks,
Anyone knows if Sangoma supports or going to provide support for battery
removal detection on FXO lines?? As Tzafrir said earlier DAHDI supports it,
which is a very nice feature but what about Sangoma?
Regards.
--
M. Shokuie Nia.
___
--
M Shokuie wrote:
DAHDI supports it, which is a very nice feature but what about Sangoma?
I would suggest you ask Sangoma, they are very responsive.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 3:33 AM, M Shokuie sena...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Folks,
Anyone knows if Sangoma supports or going to provide support for battery
removal detection on FXO lines?? As Tzafrir said earlier DAHDI supports it,
which is a very nice feature but what about Sangoma?
Hello
Alex Samad wrote:
Voltage isn't the issue - the difference is in the impedance. Australia
I get this in my dmesg when I load up the rdm410 modules
[1083334.103487] Freed a Wildcard
[1083336.171371] ALAW override parameter detected. Device will be
operating in ALAW
[1083338.040522]
Hi
I was wondering if any one has used these cards, I am looking at this as
a replacement for the tdm410, I have some issues with installing the
tdm410 in a small case because of the power plug being at the end of the
board.
I am in australia seems like we have a different setup for out fxs
Yes, although not for connecting to the PSTN - I've used one for
connecting to a legacy NEC PABX.
Voltage isn't the issue - the difference is in the impedance. Australia
uses complex impedance (220+820Ohm resistors with a 120nF capacitor)
whereas the US uses a straight resistor.
Alex Samad
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:10:48PM +1000, Rob Hillis wrote:
Yes, although not for connecting to the PSTN - I've used one for
connecting to a legacy NEC PABX.
Thats good
Voltage isn't the issue - the difference is in the impedance. Australia
I get this in my dmesg when I load up the rdm410
Hi,
I want to install an Sangoma A200 together with an BRI card.
I would like to use Asterisk 1.4
Are there any howto or tips?
First compile bristuff and after compile wanpipe?
thanks...
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
That is correct. That is the first test we did.
On 07/06/2009, Moises Silva moises.si...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Gavin Henrygavin.he...@gmail.com wrote:
Every call as soon as the sangoma card is live.
Speak to Konrad on your techdesk for more info.
Thanks.
I'll
Hi,
Has anyone ever experienced crosstalk with sangoma analogue cards on 64bit?
We have exhausted every test to try and replicate this and find a
solution with Sangoma tech support, but we can not fix it.
We are about to try the card and four *seperate* UK BT lines in a 32bit system.
The
Hi,
Has anyone ever experienced crosstalk with sangoma analogue cards on 64bit?
We have exhausted every test to try and replicate this and find a
solution with Sangoma tech support, but we can not fix it.
We are about to try the card and four *seperate* UK BT lines in a 32bit system.
The
Currently we have put in a temp OpenVOX tdm400 card and it works
perfectly. As soon as we swap that and use Sangoma via wanrouter we
get crosstalk. For example, if an existing call is happening and a new
internal to external call or vise versa happens, they can hear each
other, even just to
Every call as soon as the sangoma card is live.
Speak to Konrad on your techdesk for more info.
Thanks.
On 06/06/2009, Moises Silva moises.si...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently we have put in a temp OpenVOX tdm400 card and it works
perfectly. As soon as we swap that and use Sangoma via wanrouter
1 - 100 of 626 matches
Mail list logo
