RE: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-05 Thread Koopmann, Jan-Peter
On Monday, September 04, 2006 3:22 PM Ronald Wiplinger wrote: What's happen to you guys? Nothing. Why? I am not yelling, just asking. Maybe in a bit stressed out kind of way. It is sure not a dialplan question! Without having all necessary information that is hard to say. Maybe one

RE: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-05 Thread Koopmann, Jan-Peter
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006 2:06 AM Ronald Wiplinger wrote: In my opinion Asterisk remembers all numbers and therefore it does not wait for the 4, since it found a match. This is in VoIP (in my If both phones enter the dialplan the same way and one phone does work then it should not be a

RE: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-04 Thread Koopmann, Jan-Peter
On Sunday, September 03, 2006 3:40 AM Ronald Wiplinger wrote: try that way. However, I have doubts as well. If you are right, than why snom phone does not have this problem? Would not here also the first match count? Because the transfer button on the SNOM is using a totally different

Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-04 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote: On Sunday, September 03, 2006 3:40 AM Ronald Wiplinger wrote: try that way. However, I have doubts as well. If you are right, than why snom phone does not have this problem? Would not here also the first match count? Because the transfer button on the

RE: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-04 Thread David Gagnon
Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote: On Sunday, September 03, 2006 3:40 AM Ronald Wiplinger wrote: try that way. However, I have doubts as well. If you are right, than why snom phone does not have this problem? Would not here also the first

Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-04 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
Ronald Wiplinger Envoyé : 4 septembre 2006 09:22 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote: On Sunday, September 03, 2006 3:40 AM Ronald Wiplinger wrote: try that way. However, I have

RE: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-04 Thread wendell hamilton
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 5:06 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits David Gagnon wrote: Ronald, Like someone already told you, you should explain more clearly the way you try to transfer, we need more

Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-04 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
, bye Ronald HTH routerguy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronald Wiplinger Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 5:06 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

RE: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-04 Thread David Gagnon
-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits David Gagnon wrote: Ronald, Like someone already told you, you should explain more clearly the way you try to transfer, we need more details on the procedure, using which button on which phone. We need every

RE: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-03 Thread Fabio
Septiembre de 2006 10:40 p.m. Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Tim St. Pierre wrote: Are you using # to transfer? If so, it's not sending it as a new call, it's just sending asterisk digits using whatever DTMF

Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-02 Thread Anthony Rodgers
With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan.. CP On 1-Sep-06, at 10:37 PM, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: I found a problem in blind transfer: I have an extension number 601 and I have an extension 6014 If I get a call on 615 (snom) and transfer to 6014 it works, since snom

Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-02 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
Anthony Rodgers wrote: With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan.. WHERE do you see a problem in the numbering plan? I see the problem in ASTERISK, because it does not wait for the last digit!!! Where can I set that it waits for it? The beauty on voip IS that you can

RE: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-02 Thread David Gagnon
 : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Anthony Rodgers wrote: With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan.. WHERE do you see a problem in the numbering plan? I see the problem in ASTERISK, because it does

Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-02 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald Wiplinger Envoyé : 2 septembre 2006 04:20 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Anthony Rodgers wrote: With respect, the problem

Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-02 Thread Kevin Smith
: 2 septembre 2006 04:20 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Anthony Rodgers wrote: With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan.. This answer is therefore totally nonsense !!! (With all

Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-02 Thread Nick Ellson
: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Anthony Rodgers wrote: With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan.. This answer is therefore totally nonsense !!! (With all respect!!!) Both answers have actually not lead to any step further, but to more messages. I use

Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-02 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
key. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald Wiplinger Envoyé : 2 septembre 2006 04:20 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Anthony Rodgers wrote

Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-02 Thread Tim St. Pierre
Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Anthony Rodgers wrote: With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan.. This answer is therefore totally nonsense !!! (With all respect!!!) Both answers have actually not lead to any step further

Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-02 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Anthony Rodgers wrote: With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan.. This answer is therefore totally nonsense !!! (With all respect!!!) Both answers

[asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

2006-09-01 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
I found a problem in blind transfer: I have an extension number 601 and I have an extension 6014 If I get a call on 615 (snom) and transfer to 6014 it works, since snom requires me to hit ok If I get a call on 601 and transfer to 6014, than 601 will get the busy signal and I hang up as