- Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is not set. Part of the problem may be that 3254103 STILL HAS CONTROL
of the call. I have not pressed transfer a second time yet to release
the call, and Asterisk still think that it is attended at this point.
Small clarification: at this
I have
three phones here with extensions 2944093, 3254103 and
9220371.
2944093 calls 3254103. 3254103 transfers 2944093 to 9220371. We want the
caller id of 2944093 to be presented on the display of
9220371.
However, the caller id of the transferer, 3254103, is appearing. This
doesn't
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Garstang
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:25:15 -0300
Subject: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on
Transfers
I have three phones here with extensions
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Colp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 8:41 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on Transfers
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Garstang
[mailto
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Garstang
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:37:10 -0300
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on
Transfers
What type of transfer? blind
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 14:37, Douglas Garstang wrote:
What type of transfer? blind or attended?
Does it matter? Both...
Yes it does matter. On any KSU or PBX I have used, attended transfers show
the name/extension of the transferer (presumably because it is THEM you are
talking to).
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:48 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on Transfers
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 14:37, Douglas Garstang wrote:
What type of transfer
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Colp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 8:54 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on Transfers
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Garstang
[mailto
Douglas Garstang wrote:
talking to). Blind transfers show the original caller.
Doesn't seem to be happening that way with Polycom phones and blind/attended
transfers.
Both are showing the original calling party caller id.
___
I can
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Garstang
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:31:13 -0300
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on
Transfers
I thought the new SIP invite had
that's odd, our Polycom phones show the original caller id on blind transfers but the callerid of the person doing the attended transfer, in our case a receptionist. On 7/25/06,
Doug Lytle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Douglas Garstang wrote: talking to).Blind transfers show the original caller.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Lytle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 1:37 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on Transfers
Douglas Garstang wrote:
talking to). Blind transfers show
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Colp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 9:47 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on Transfers
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Garstang
[mailto
Bruce,
I bet your doing Asterisk assisted transfers (blindxfer and atxfer in
features.conf), and not using the 'transfer' soft or hard key on the Polycom
phones...
-Original Message-From: Bruce Reeves
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006
1:53 PMTo: Asterisk
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Garstang
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:03:00 -0300
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on
Transfers
If the new invite looks like a regular
Douglas Garstang wrote:
DOug
Hi Doug. Your doing your transfers with the transfer keys on the Polycom, right? So am I. I think a distinction needs to be made here. I get the impression that most people, and certainly the others are using #1 and #2 to do Asterisk assisted transfers.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Lytle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 2:27 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on Transfers
Douglas Garstang wrote:
DOug
Hi Doug. Your doing your
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Colp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:31 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on Transfers
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Garstang
[mailto
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Doug,
Thanks, but this isn't the same scenario. Can you try transferring from one
Polycom to another Polycom?
Not until the end of the week. I have an order for more phones.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a
In my experience (although I didn't test this as I type now) using the
Transfer button on the Polycom if you do a blind will show the
original CID, and doing an attended will show the transferees CID.
RDNIS should not come up, but ${BLINDTRANSFER} on a blindtransfer
should. On a non blind
.
Regards,
- Brad
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas
GarstangSent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:05 PMTo: Asterisk
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: RE:
[asterisk-users] Caller ID on Transfers
Bruce,
I bet your doing Asterisk assisted
This behavior Bruce mentioned is confirmed with our installation
(krisk.org cfg files)
Bruce Reeves wrote:
that's odd, our Polycom phones show the original caller id on blind
transfers but the callerid of the person doing the attended transfer, in
our case a receptionist.
On 7/25/06, * Doug
The 'o' option to the Dial() command, along with using blind transfers,
fixed this problem for us.
A.
On Jul 25, 2006, at 11:25 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote:
I have three phones here with extensions 2944093, 3254103 and 9220371.
2944093 calls 3254103. 3254103 transfers 2944093 to 9220371. We
-Original Message-
From: C F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:06 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on Transfers
In my experience (although I didn't test this as I type now) using
-users] Caller ID on
Transfers
I can say with absolute certainty that in our
installations using the blind transfer of the Polycom (NOT the Asterisk
transfers) will show the original caller ID and not the caller ID of the
transferer. Attended transfers, of course, show the transferer since
1.5.x
On 7/25/06, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: C F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:06 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on Transfers
In my experience
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Rodgers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:21 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on Transfers
The 'o' option to the Dial() command, along with using blind
AFTER the destination number has started to ring.
Doug.
-Original Message-
From: Watkins, Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:15 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on Transfers
I can say
, 2006 4:15 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on Transfers
I can say with
absolute certainty that in our installations using the blind transfer of
the Polycom (NOT the Asterisk transfers) will show the original caller ID
-Original Message-
From: C F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:34 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on Transfers
what version of asterisk you using? I use the ${BLINDTRANSFER} a lot
in my
-Original Message-
From: C F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:46 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on Transfers
so you are telling me that all the time you have been bitching you
have
DiscussionSubject: RE:
[asterisk-users] Caller ID on Transfers
I
don't understand how that's possible. When you press the 'transfer' button on
the polycom, enter a number, and press send, the SIP messaging and setup at that
point is exactly the same for both an attended and unattanded call
: [asterisk-users] Caller ID on Transfers
so you are telling me that all the time you have been bitching you
have been doing an attended transfer.
anyhow, once you hit transfer, another soft button shows up which says
blind hit that and dial the number.
Oh Crud. Well, here's what I was doing wrong
We have contracted with an outside call center to provide sales for a
certain product. We want to be able to transfer people over to those
dedicated sales agents using an attended transfer (so we can prepare them
with as much information as we have), to a regular extension. So far, so
good. All
34 matches
Mail list logo
