On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 11:35 AM Antony Stone <
antony.st...@asterisk.open.source.it> wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 September 2022 at 15:32:50, Thomas Ray wrote:
>
> > From https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Channels
> >
> > "The primary exception is with Local Channels. In the case of local
>
On Wednesday 07 September 2022 at 15:32:50, Thomas Ray wrote:
> From https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Channels
>
> "The primary exception is with Local Channels. In the case of local
> channels, you'll typically have two local channel legs, one that is
> treated as outbound and the
From: asterisk-users on behalf of
"Joshua C. Colp"
Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Date: Wednesday, September 7, 2022 at 10:23 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Channel names with
On Wednesday 07 September 2022 at 15:21:59, Joshua C. Colp wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 11:17 AM Antony Stone wrote:
> >
> > This is a follow-up to an email I posted earlier today to the list,
> There's nothing in the moderator queue that I can see.
Thanks, sent again, and immediately
From https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Channels
"The primary exception is with Local Channels. In the case of local channels,
you'll typically have two local channel legs, one that is treated as outbound
and the other as inbound. In this case both are really inside Asterisk, but one
Hi.
I'm trying to deal with a problem regarding putting a call on hold and then
later resuming it. I am using chan_sip throughout, and Asterisk 16.
I have two scenarios:
First (works):
1. An inbound call arrives, the dialplan does not Answer() it.
2. The dialplan performs a Dial() to an
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 11:17 AM Antony Stone <
antony.st...@asterisk.open.source.it> wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 September 2022 at 11:44:54, Antony Stone wrote:
>
> > Hi.
>
> This is a follow-up to an email I posted earlier today to the list,
> although I
> haven't seen it come back yet. If it's
On Wednesday 07 September 2022 at 11:44:54, Antony Stone wrote:
> Hi.
This is a follow-up to an email I posted earlier today to the list, although I
haven't seen it come back yet. If it's under moderation for some reason, I
hope some kindly admin will release it :)
> I'm trying to deal with
Hi
I'm using asterisk 1.8.
How are channel names constructed. I always thought they were
technology/peer-hex counter
but I've had a lot of instances where a channel name doesn't have the
correct peer as part of it.
Is it unwise to use channel names to extract the peers involved in a call?
--
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Ishfaq Malik i...@pack-net.co.uk wrote:
Hi
I'm using asterisk 1.8.
How are channel names constructed. I always thought they were
technology/peer-hex counter
but I've had a lot of instances where a channel name doesn't have the
correct peer as part of it.
On 1 May 2014 15:19, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Ishfaq Malik i...@pack-net.co.uk wrote:
Hi
I'm using asterisk 1.8.
How are channel names constructed. I always thought they were
technology/peer-hex counter
but I've had a lot of instances
11 matches
Mail list logo
