Re: [asterisk-users] PBX selection

Hi all, Finally we make decision that go with PortSIP, the reasons are below: 1. Support the easy cluster deployment for handle large concurrent calls and provide 2. All REST API(this is very important to us for integrate the PBX with our current system), and also offer the rebrand app for free.

Re: [asterisk-users] PBX selection

;> >> Good luck, >> >> Alex >> >> -- >> >> Alex Epshteyn >> email: a...@thirdlane.com >> web: www.thirdlane.com >> phone +1 415.261.6601 >> >> >> - Original Message - >> > From: "J Montoya or A J Stiles"

Re: [asterisk-users] PBX selection

irdlane.com > web: www.thirdlane.com > phone +1 415.261.6601 > > > - Original Message - > > From: "J Montoya or A J Stiles" <asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk> > > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" < > asterisk-users@

Re: [asterisk-users] PBX selection

Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PBX selection Thanks All. Thanks Alex, we also tested thirdlane PBX, and comparing it with PortSIP PBX, Vodia PBX, we hope we can make decision next week. Best r

Re: [asterisk-users] PBX selection

lt;asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk> > > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" < > asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 1:40:47 AM > > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PBX selection > > > > On Monda

Re: [asterisk-users] PBX selection

-Commercial Discussion" > <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 1:40:47 AM > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PBX selection > > On Monday 17 Apr 2017, Speed Boy wrote: > > Hi all, I'm new to VoIP, now we have a project that needs a > > P

Re: [asterisk-users] PBX selection

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:57:27PM +0800, Speed Boy wrote: > Hi all, I'm new to VoIP, now we have a project that needs a > PBX with client APPs. > In our team we have argument for choosing PBX. By so far, we > have following candidates: > > A: Open source > > 1) Asterisk PBX

Re: [asterisk-users] PBX selection

On 18 April 2017 at 09:40, J Montoya or A J Stiles wrote: > > It is always preferrable to compile your own Asterisk to fit your hardware and > include just the bits you want, rather than rely on anyone else's pre-compiled > package. Feel free to take a look at

Re: [asterisk-users] PBX selection

On Monday 17 Apr 2017, Speed Boy wrote: > Hi all, I'm new to VoIP, now we have a project that needs a > PBX with client APPs. > In our team we have argument for choosing PBX. By so far, we > have following candidates: > > A: Open source > > 1) Asterisk PBX (http://www.asterisk.org) (with

Re: [asterisk-users] PBX selection

On 2017-04-17 12:41 PM, Victor Villarreal wrote: * Asterisk is build to work on Linux. So your team needs some skills like setting up a basic Linux server (Debian, Centos, etc), donwload software from Internet, compile and install software manually. It may be that the developers mostly use

Re: [asterisk-users] PBX selection

Hi Speed Boy. I agree with Emiliano Vazquez too. Additionally, you and your team must think others points before choose Asterisk: * Asterisk is build to work on Linux. So your team needs some skills like setting up a basic Linux server (Debian, Centos, etc), donwload software from Internet,

Re: [asterisk-users] PBX selection

I prefer Asterisk for my projects. On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Speed Boy wrote: > Hi all, I'm new to VoIP, now we have a project that needs a > PBX with client APPs. > In our team we have argument for choosing PBX. By so far, we > have following candidates: > >

[asterisk-users] PBX selection

Hi all, I'm new to VoIP, now we have a project that needs a PBX with client APPs. In our team we have argument for choosing PBX. By so far, we have following candidates: A: Open source 1) Asterisk PBX (http://www.asterisk.org) (with longest history that almost every one knows it, now