Just FYI, I wrote an application that tracks the status of SIP or IAX2
extensions by listening to the AMI. It was for use by callshops but
would probably require minimal change to work for you. It's currently
part of the ASTPP source code.
Darren Wiebe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Atis Lezdins wrote:
Hello users,
I had developed several patches that allows to monitor current status
of queues/channels in realtime db. For example specifying realtime
family channels will make asterisk to keep current channel list in
realtime database engine. The same would be for queue callers and
queue members
Atis Lezdins schrieb:
I had developed several patches that allows to monitor current status
of queues/channels in realtime db.
[...]
+1 as long as the user can choose whether they want realtime status
data in the database.
*** Supporting this feature
If You find that those features would be
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 16:11:05 Atis Lezdins wrote:
However I encountered a resistance from Asterisk developers, as they
don't wish to accept my patches - because they don't wish to support
another interface. As I read in Bug Guidelines, if enough users
request this, it should make into
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Tilghman Lesher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 16:11:05 Atis Lezdins wrote:
However I encountered a resistance from Asterisk developers, as they
don't wish to accept my patches - because they don't wish to support
another interface. As I
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 17:27:33 Atis Lezdins wrote:
So all together - I'm saying there could be really simple interface
for all this - no troubles with locking of lists or keeping persistent
connections. Why would user application need to take care of all this,
if DB engine can do that.
Tilghman Lesher a écrit :
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 17:27:33 Atis Lezdins wrote:
So all together - I'm saying there could be really simple interface
for all this - no troubles with locking of lists or keeping persistent
connections. Why would user application need to take care of all this,
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Benoit Plessis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tilghman Lesher a écrit :
Your question leads to this question: why don't you create a proxy
application that listens on AMI and populates a database outside of
Asterisk,
then do all your queries to that database?
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:49 AM, Ex Vito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Benoit Plessis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tilghman Lesher a écrit :
Your question leads to this question: why don't you create a proxy
application that listens on AMI and populates a
