On Saturday 01 September 2018 at 22:12:50, sean darcy wrote:
> 13.21.0
>
> Every 2-3 minutes:
Does it really vary, or is it more like "every 150 seconds"?
> Sep 1 16:00:57] WARNING[150257]: res_stun_monitor.c:140
> stun_monitor_request: STUN poll got no response. Re-evaluating STUN
> server
13.21.0
Every 2-3 minutes:
Sep 1 16:00:57] WARNING[150257]: res_stun_monitor.c:140
stun_monitor_request: STUN poll got no response. Re-evaluating STUN
server address.
[Sep 1 16:02:18] NOTICE[150257]: res_stun_monitor.c:151
stun_monitor_request: Old external address/port :42562 now
seen as
We have been running a windows stun server for 5 years now and I would like
to change to either a linux of freebsd based unit to phase out the old XP
box in our datacenter. What should I look at that would be a good
replacement. The windows box has worked but the hardware is at end of life
: [asterisk-users] Stun Server
We have been running a windows stun server for 5 years now and I would like
to change to either a linux of freebsd based unit to phase out the old XP
box in our datacenter. What should I look at that would be a good
replacement. The windows box has worked
Hello, i want to instal STUN Server in my Asterisk-PC. is it possible ? if
yes, how kann i do it ? where can i find STUN Program?
Thanks for your help.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
I have been trying out several stun servers with Asterisk 1.6.0.9 and
1.6.1.0 and I keep getting the following message:
[May 26 12:26:35] WARNING[16174]: chan_sip.c:2695 ast_sip_ouraddrfor:
stun failed
[May 26 12:26:35] WARNING[16174]: chan_sip.c:2695 ast_sip_ouraddrfor:
stun failed
[May
[May 26 12:26:35] WARNING[16174]: chan_sip.c:2695 ast_sip_ouraddrfor:
stun failed
No matter which STUN server I point to I get those messages. Am I
missing some other setting?
Hey Carlos,
That just means the stun request failed, there are several reasons for
that, I won't even try
Howdy,
Scenario:
Asterisk server
Customer connected over internet using nat
Customer phones are Linksys 942 with Stun enabled
Issue:
Inbound and Outbound calls work fine. But when phones call each other
internally we have to carry the voice stream ie using t on dial commands.
Question:
Is
Howdy,
I have the following issue and would like to know if anyone has got around this
before.
IP Phones - Linksys 942
Sip server - Asterisk 1.4.13
Stun server - Vovida
Ok heres the issue. We have multiple client phones on their own network behind
a natted connection. We have setup the
Hi guys,
I'm trying to implement STUN support in *, is there anyone here which
have any experience in something like that?
I've got the STUND and I'll try to buld a patch or something for sip.
Any ideas or existing implementation would be nice. I know openpbx have it.
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Joe Acquisto wrote:
Is it possible to install a stun server on asterisk?
You can install a stun server on the same PC that asterisk is running on.
No need for it to be part of asterisk itself, it's a totally separate
program and will exist happily on the same server.
Gordon Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wrote: 4/4/2007 3:32 AM:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Joe Acquisto wrote:
Is it possible to install a stun server on asterisk?
You can install a stun server on the same PC that asterisk is running
on.
No need for it to be part of asterisk itself, it's a totally
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Joe Acquisto wrote:
Gordon Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wrote: 4/4/2007 3:32 AM:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Joe Acquisto wrote:
Is it possible to install a stun server on asterisk?
You can install a stun server on the same PC that asterisk is running
on.
No need for it to be
. . .
http://sourceforge.net/projects/stun/
Which is linked from:
http://www.vovida.org/applications/downloads/stun/
That's what I'm running.
Gordon
Thanks. Looking there, why would I need a stun client if the
device/softdevice already has STUN support?
All I should need is
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Joe Acquisto wrote:
. . .
http://sourceforge.net/projects/stun/
Which is linked from:
http://www.vovida.org/applications/downloads/stun/
That's what I'm running.
Gordon
Thanks. Looking there, why would I need a stun client if the
device/softdevice already has
Joe Acquisto wrote:
. . .
http://sourceforge.net/projects/stun/
Which is linked from:
http://www.vovida.org/applications/downloads/stun/
That's what I'm running.
Gordon
Thanks. Looking there, why would I need a stun client if the
device/softdevice already has STUN
Is it possible to install a stun server on asterisk?
joe a.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
22 jan 2007 kl. 07.38 skrev Thomas Deillon:
Hi all,
I read somewhere that asterisk v 1.4 can make Stun and SNMP.
I tried to find more information on these features but I didn’t
find any clues.
Someone find a way to use it?
There's a module called res_snmp that implements an SNMP agent
Hi all,
I read somewhere that asterisk v 1.4 can make Stun and SNMP.
I tried to find more information on these features but I didn't find any
clues.
Someone find a way to use it?
Thanks,
Thomas
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation
Browsing through the developers documentation and 1.4 source, I see
references to STUN in the code and documentation.
Does 1.4 have support for STUN, if so how is it configured?
Regards,
David
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Are you kidding? Lighten up people!
Al made a friendly recommendation based on the comments regarding TrixBox.
Go have a beer... take a load off... enjoy the holidays.
Regards,
David
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
You said voxbox is better, but even the link you gave for them didn't work.
I googled, and apparantly links are broken on their website.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update
I never said voxbox is better than trixbox.
I said You like trixbox Should try voxbox.
The link is: http://www.easyvoxbox.org/
Trixbox has good and bad points (loads from RPM's)
Voxbox has good and bad points (Loads from source)
I like source better than RPM's -- Thats me, but I
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Zeeshan Zakaria wrote:
You said voxbox is better, but even the link you gave for them didn't work.
I googled, and apparantly links are broken on their website.
Not to mention that the humongous ad for voxbox, in response to my
TECHNICAL QUESTION, was completely out of
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Al Bochter wrote:
I never said voxbox is better than trixbox.
I said You like trixbox Should try voxbox.
Yes.
You didn't answer my question, and then you posted all of THIS crap...
Are you outside of the US?
Do you need to call US Toll Free Numbers?
We
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Steve Sobol wrote:
So I'm wondering... I'm using stund from SourceForge. Is there any reason
I couldn't give the Trixbox's public IP address as the primary and
127.0.0.1 as the secondary? I believe Asterisk is listening on the
loopback interface...
Following up to
I'm finishing up deploying an Asterisk (Trixbox) box at work. Wow, I
thought Asterisk was cool by itself, but Trixbox has made just about
everything turnkey. Great stuff!
So... we're using Grandstream GXP-2000 handsets to connect to the Trixbox,
which sits on our DMZ with a single public IP. I
You like trixbox Should try voxbox.
Best regards,
Al Bochter
Bochter Services
http://www.BochterServices.com/?t=Email
Are you outside of the US?
Do you need to call US Toll Free Numbers?
We can help you save money on calling US toll free numbers.
Email for information: [EMAIL
Hi all,
Could someone point at resources for running Asterisk behind
a firewall.
STUN keeps coming up but, alas, Im easily confused. J
Ray
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To
On Jun 26, 2006, at 9:32 AM, Raymond Tant wrote:
x-tad-smallerHi all,/x-tad-smallerx-tad-smaller /x-tad-smallerx-tad-smallerCould someone point at resources for running Asterisk behind a firewall./x-tad-smallerx-tad-smallerSTUN keeps coming up but, alas, I’m easily confused.
please type in google.com:
STUN server ALG
The fourth result is a good and small explanation.
On 6/26/06, Martin Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 26, 2006, at 9:32 AM, Raymond Tant wrote:
Hi all,
Could someone point at resources for running Asterisk behind a
firewall.
STUN keeps
Hi list,
I want to setup a stun server. I tried stun server from vovida and mystun, but
my voip phone said that logon failed. When I use stun.xten.com works fine.
This is vovida stun in verbose mode:
***received on A1:P1
Got a request (len=28) from xxx.186.145.226:5060
Received stun
I seriously doubt that message has something to do with the stun
server. Have you read what the STUN server does? The message you are
getting is most likely to be because of wrong registration user name
or password in your voip phone.
Any way, if you are still interested in having the stun
On Thursday 11 May 2006 16:51, Moises Silva wrote:
I seriously doubt that message has something to do with the stun
server. Have you read what the STUN server does? The message you are
I known what do a stun server.
getting is most likely to be because of wrong registration user name
or
I was thinking in sending you an attachment, but I have decided to put
it on the web, you can get it in
http://phpmexic.u33.0web-hosting.com/wordpress/ebuilds/vovida-stun-0.96-ebuild.tar.bz2
Let me know if you it have bugs
Regards
On 5/11/06, Serghei Amelian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
On Thursday 11 May 2006 18:32, Moises Silva wrote:
I was thinking in sending you an attachment, but I have decided to put
it on the web, you can get it in
http://phpmexic.u33.0web-hosting.com/wordpress/ebuilds/vovida-stun-0.96-ebu
ild.tar.bz2
Let me know if you it have bugs
I'm not lucky,
Thanks for the fix :)
About DNS, I think only the primary stun address should be registered.
Try using as stun server grievous.ivsol.net, is our stun server and is
installed with the ebuild I sent you. That will give us more hints
about where the problem might be.
Try using the stunclient
On Thursday 11 May 2006 21:10, Moises Silva wrote:
Thanks for the fix :)
no problem
About DNS, I think only the primary stun address should be registered.
Try using as stun server grievous.ivsol.net, is our stun server and is
installed with the ebuild I sent you. That will give us more hints
Hi,
Do we need STUN server with Asterisk(1.2.6) for SIP phones which are using
NAT on different networks ???
Thanks
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
What is this sip-nat-helper thing, is there a website were we can get
some info on it, partly thinking as the question before was relating to
open source software, I would assume that I could download this thing.
Dan
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have a linux box, then
I'm wondering if anyone can recommend one over the other. I'm mostly
interested in running open source solutions, so I would prefer if
your recommendations are within the open source arena.
Basically, I contemplated the idea of using SER as a NAT Helper and
possibly as a SIP server for a
If you have a linux box, then u can try sip-nat-helper for netfilter.
Cheers.
Mensaje citado por: Waldo Rubinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I\'m wondering if anyone can recommend one over the other. I\'m mostly
interested in running open source solutions, so I would prefer if
your recommendations
I think STUN is quite widely supported by hardphones. I'd be interested
to know if STUN is a magic fix to SIP NAT - I've a feeling that its not.
Derek
Waldo Rubinstein wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone can recommend one over the other. I'm mostly
interested in running open source solutions,
Hello,
I'm having intermittent STUN trouble. Every one out of perhaps 5 reboots
the PAP2 contacts STUN ... on the other attempts it just skips that step all
together. I have been verifying this using ethereal which shows the
distinctive STUN server DNS lookup followed by about 10 STUN queries
, 2005 8:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stun support
someshwarak wrote:
Hi * users,
I want to know if STUN suport is available with Asterisk.
Kindly let me know. I have posted this also in DEV list but none
Rajeew Kumar Singh wrote:
Hi Eric,
How one can make outgoing call to a SIP user sitting in the Internet when
Asterisk is not configured with Outbound Proxy to some SIP Proxy server on
the Internet for this simple scenario ?
SIP UA A --- Asterisk ---NAT---Internet--- SIP UA
Hi *
users,
I want to know if
STUN suport is available with Asterisk.
Kindly let me know.
I have posted this also in DEV list but none replied to me.
thanks,
Somesh
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
someshwarak wrote:
Hi * users,
I want to know if STUN suport is available with Asterisk.
Kindly let me know. I have posted this also in DEV list but none replied to
me.
Short Answer: No.
Longer Answer: No, and most people that think they need STUN don't
actually need it.
--
Eric Wieling
I have two phones, one does not need stun, the other one needs.
All settings are identically, except the number/password and said above
stun - not stun
I use codec in the order:
g729
g711u
g711a
Any ideas, why the user can hear me, but I cannot hear him (stun) while
the other user without stun
I uses to have this when I enabled stun and did not need it
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 16:55, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
I have two phones, one does not need stun, the other one needs.
All settings are identically, except the number/password and said above
stun - not stun
I use codec in the
You can use Ethereal to see what your phone (stun) is
sending. Of this way you can see the RTP ports and IP
public that your phones are going to use. You can see
that information in INVITE and OK packets.
For other hand, If you use one router with symmetrical
NAT then Stun won't work
Hi,
Does asterisk have in itself an STUN server built in? Or do I need to
set one up seperately? And if that is the case, what is recommended
for use with asterisk (to allow VOIP users behind nats to connect to
my VOIP servers)
Matt
___
Asterisk-Users
Hi!
Asterisk supports NAT!
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+Avoid+SIP+NAT+Traversal
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+sip+nat+solutions
/Madhawa
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:17:14 -0500, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Does asterisk have in itself an STUN server built in? Or do I need
I have a SER server and an * server, both have private
addresses and have static nat's on the router to the
internet. I have installed STUN (by vovida) on the SER
server by giving the SER server a second private
address on a sub interface (which is probably not
right). I understand I need a
STUN requires 2 NIC interfaces on the machine running the server right? And
both interfaces need seperate public IP's right? 'And' the phones/ATA's need
to support STUN right? I don't think the Cisco phones support STUN.
-Matthew
- Original Message -
From: Brian Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Non-Commercial Discussion
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 9:51 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] STUN and Asterisk? (Was: SER is a better NAT
solution?)
STUN requires 2 NIC interfaces on the machine running the server right?
And
both interfaces need seperate public IP's right
Sure they do. I have a bunch of Cisco phones that support STUN.
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 03:51 pm, Matthew Boehm wrote:
STUN requires 2 NIC interfaces on the machine running the server right? And
both interfaces need seperate public IP's right? 'And' the phones/ATA's
need to support STUN
Matthew Boehm wrote:
STUN requires 2 NIC interfaces on the machine running the server right?
And both interfaces need seperate public IP's right? '
Why ever for?
I realize that in order to set up a STUN server you need a public IP,
but why two of them and why two different interfaces?
Dazed and
]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] STUN and Asterisk? (Was: SER is a better
NATsolution?)
Matthew Boehm wrote:
STUN requires 2 NIC interfaces on the machine running the server right
hi,
i want to use mystun because off nat problems by more than one device
behind one nat gw. i think it is the only solution to solve the nat
problem.
what i do not understand is why needs the stun server two ip addresses?
thx for any hints.
--
Thomas Küpper
01063 Telecom GmbH Co. KG
Thomas Kuepper wrote:
hi,
i want to use mystun because off nat problems by more than one device
behind one nat gw. i think it is the only solution to solve the nat
problem.
what i do not understand is why needs the stun server two ip addresses?
It needs 2 IPs because the server will attempt to
AJ Grinnell wrote:
What is the best free stun server out there? The one that I have looked at
from vovida requires two NICs. Is this neccessary?
I don't know which server is the best one, I'm using the one from IPtel.org.
You need two IP addresses for STUN to work, with a proper implementation
http://developer.berlios.de/projects/mystun/ works fine for me. Tested
on debian sarge with one NIC and two IP addresses for this NIC.
Klaus
AJ Grinnell wrote:
What is the best free stun server out there? The one that I have looked at
from vovida requires two NICs. Is this neccessary?
What is the best free stun server out there? The one that I have looked at
from vovida requires two NICs. Is this neccessary?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or
AJ Grinnell wrote:
What is the best free stun server out there? The one that I have looked at
from vovida requires two NICs. Is this neccessary?
Asterisk does not require STUN.
Jeremy McNamara
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
STUN can be nice when connecting to Asterisk behind
NAT in some situations. X-Lite/Pro softphones,
Grandstream Budgetones and a few other clients make
great use of STUN.
That being said, the only good (free) STUN server I've
seen is the Vovida one that requires two NICs. It
works very well, if
I just put multiple IPs on the same interface and use -a eth0:1 ip.
Seems to work fine.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
Hi...I'm trying to figure out the famous 3 tests that a STUN client uses for
determining the kind of NAT that it is behind.
Is there a command line client available to send binding requests to a known
STUN server?
I'm aware of the SourceForge ones.
Either Linux or Windows
OK, I've breifly looked at STUN and what it is and can do.
First off it is NOT a way to punch UDP through a firewall.
STUN offers a method to determine the firewall environment
and find out just what is out there. But leaves it to
Asterisk to determine what to do.
The way it could be used within
Chris,
snip
OK, I've breifly looked at STUN and what it is and can do.
First off it is NOT a way to punch UDP through a firewall.
snip
Bottom line: STUN could save the user much configuration
hassel but does noting that a very knowagable person could
not figure out and then put into a
Sorry to answer a question with a question..
Can stund and * be loaded on the same server and run at the same time?
Later..
Not sure if it's alright to talk about this here???
compiled the STUN server from Vovida on RedHat 7.3. Looks simple to
configure. It isn't starting...it tries to for
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 09:01, WipeOut . wrote:
Sorry to answer a question with a question..
Can stund and * be loaded on the same server and run at the same time?
I've also never been able to figure out stund, if that is possible
wouldn't it be the answer to most of the SIP difficulties.
--
The client device has to support stun.
Bugetones do, ATA do, 7960 don't..etc
Dave Cotton wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 09:01, WipeOut . wrote:
Sorry to answer a question with a question..
Can stund and * be loaded on the same server and run at the same time?
I've also never been
I would suggest you use the Vovida STUN CVS Version. It worked fine on our
RedHat 7.3. Look though the Vovida mail archives to learn where it is
exactly. And no...this is not a fix for all the NAT troubles, STUN does not
work with Symmetric NATs. But the good point is that Symmetric NATs
Only hard phones with STUN support that I am aware of are Grandstream and
SNOM. I am sure the Cisco ATA186 does not support STUN.
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 09:11, James Sizemore wrote:
The client device has to support stun.
Bugetones do, ATA do, 7960 don't..etc
Dave Cotton wrote:
Not sure if it's alright to talk about this here???
compiled the STUN server from Vovida on RedHat 7.3. Looks simple to
configure. It isn't starting...it tries to for a long time and then just
craps out. Here is my config:/etc/sysconfig/stund
#!/bin/echo Not to execute.
# Path to stund
76 matches
Mail list logo
