On 15/6/10 06:22, Randy R wrote:
By the way, I am currently testing this product from Skype. I would
like to be able to receive calls ona Skype name on our pbx.
1) It works beautifully and you don't have to do anything in particular.
2) It's disproportionally expensive which is why I want
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Thomas Kenyon
dig...@sanguinarius.co.uk wrote:
On 15/6/10 06:22, Randy R wrote:
In October, they will begin charging for Skype Manager (required for
SfS) and a per seat charge for that.
SfA also requires Skype Manager, and only works with users that were
By the way, I am currently testing this product from Skype. I would
like to be able to receive calls ona Skype name on our pbx.
1) It works beautifully and you don't have to do anything in particular.
2) It's disproportionally expensive which is why I want Skype for
Asterisk to work.
SfS costs
I noticed a quote from you at GigOM:
Even if this is complete vaporware at least their heart is in the
right direction. Last year they announced Skype for Asterisk which is
still not yet released and it’s unclear what the pricing will be.
Skype For SIP is similar in that it is not yet available
From: Guillermo Salas M. gsa...@manta.telconet.net
http://www.gizmo5.com/opensky Free calls are available up to 5
minutes. If you need longer calls there's a commercial service you can
purchase.
Can be used to receive calls from skype?
Yes it can. For example anyone who calls me now on Skype
On 23 Mar 2009, at 19:42, Gordon Henderson wrote:
Anyone connected up to it yet?
http://www.skypeforsip.com/
It would seem to make Digiums chan_skype rather pointness, or am I
missing
something?
Or is this Digiums chan_skype in a hosted box somewhere?
Gordon
There are fewer
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Tim Panton t...@westhawk.co.uk wrote:
There are fewer limitations to SFA than SFS. SFA gets presence and full user
info, plus it can
make calls to Skype users, which SFS cant.
I'm hoping that Digium will extend this difference by adding support for
text and
Anyone connected up to it yet?
http://www.skypeforsip.com/
It would seem to make Digiums chan_skype rather pointness, or am I missing
something?
Or is this Digiums chan_skype in a hosted box somewhere?
Gordon
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation
I wonder why they only allow G.729 with this ... where's the great sound of
the skype call now ?
Martin
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Gordon Henderson
gordon+aster...@drogon.net gordon%2baster...@drogon.net wrote:
Anyone connected up to it yet?
http://www.skypeforsip.com/
It would
I'm looking at the http://support.a-link.com/phonemate/IPU1.htm phone
because it works with Skype (from Linux), but can do SIP, too.
Not necessarily asterisk related, but possibly. My networking situation
might require IAX if I'm running Linux and want to use SIP, I'm not
certain (Skype works
It''s a USB Sound card / keypad / display, not a phone. It contols a
softphone on the PC it's plugged into - they say it works with XLite -
the SIP setup will be done in Xlite, not the 'phone'.
Peter
On 05/11/06, Thufir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking at the
11 matches
Mail list logo
