On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Steven Critchfield wrote:
So you bought that line of Marketecture didn't you. I think there are
several large open source projects that prove that C is maintainable.
Maintainability is really a function of organization. If you can't be
organized, you will not produce very
On 03/11/03 00:25, Mark Spencer wrote:
As a side note, I strongly would like to see someone implement a
client using libiax2 which implements IAX2 instead of the (now
obsolescent) IAX version 1.
I'm implementing a Java-based IVR server (and yes, I know Asterisk does
IVR, and no, it's not flexible
Alastair Maw wrote:
On 03/11/03 00:25, Mark Spencer wrote:
As a side note, I strongly would like to see someone implement a
client using libiax2 which implements IAX2 instead of the (now
obsolescent) IAX version 1.
I'm implementing a Java-based IVR server (and yes, I know Asterisk does
IVR,
On 03/11/03 16:35, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
I'm implementing a Java-based IVR server (and yes, I know Asterisk does
IVR, and no, it's not flexible enough to do what I want and no, it
doesn't integrate well with the Java systems we have, etc. hence my
doing this).
Are you mad? What is not flexable
On 03/11/03 18:02, Alastair Maw wrote:
I'm implementing a Java-based IVR server (and yes, I know Asterisk does
IVR, and no, it's not flexible enough to do what I want and no, it
doesn't integrate well with the Java systems we have, etc. hence my
doing this).
Are you mad? What is not flexable
On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 12:02, Alastair Maw wrote:
On 03/11/03 16:35, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
I'm implementing a Java-based IVR server (and yes, I know Asterisk does
IVR, and no, it's not flexible enough to do what I want and no, it
doesn't integrate well with the Java systems we have, etc.
On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 13:49, Alastair Maw wrote:
On 03/11/03 18:02, Alastair Maw wrote:
I'm implementing a Java-based IVR server (and yes, I know Asterisk does
IVR, and no, it's not flexible enough to do what I want and no, it
doesn't integrate well with the Java systems we have, etc. hence
- Should I implement IAX or IAX2? What's the main difference, other
than IAX2 supporting trunking (which according to the docs needs a
Zaptel timing source).
IAX2 without any question. You will not be required to run trunk mode in
your case, especially if you're just doing it
On 03/11/03 20:03, Steven Critchfield wrote:
Sounds like you really need a C programmer and get into the guts
of asterisk. Can't get more flexible than having the source code
yourself to do anything you want. You could add your DSP routines into
the dsp.c file and call them when needed. You can
On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 16:27, Alastair Maw wrote:
On 03/11/03 20:03, Steven Critchfield wrote:
Sounds like you really need a C programmer and get into the guts
of asterisk. Can't get more flexible than having the source code
yourself to do anything you want. You could add your DSP routines
10 matches
Mail list logo