On Tuesday 20 April 2021 at 22:03:50, Telium Technical Support wrote:
> How about starting a console with verbose turned up. After a loss of
> registrations review the console output to see if there is some event.
Alternatively turn on verbose (or debug) logging and then review the log files
How about starting a console with verbose turned up. After a loss of
registrations review the console output to see if there is some event.
From: asterisk-users [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On
Behalf Of Mike Diehl
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 3:54 PM
To: Asterisk Users
On 05/08/13 12:38, Kamlesh Kumar wrote:
Hi,
Asterisk 1.6.2.9
PHP 5.3
Mysql 5.0
Can anyone suggest hardware specification for 500 hundred concurrent
SIP only calls, no codec transcoding, no IVR, no Voicemail or so. Just
plain switching. There is only one requirement is to execute one php
Hi to all,
I've managed to get the XMPP PubSub method to work on my set-up! Just
carefully follow these instructions on the wiki:
https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Distributed+Device+State+with+XMPP+PubSub
Maybe this IRC log would also help you troubleshoot:
Hi Ishfaq,
Thanks for your reply. I've already started trying the XMPP method so I
can't help you with the AIS method as of the moment. I'll let you know the
result of my test.
Regards,
Ronald
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Ishfaq Malik i...@pack-net.co.uk wrote:
Hi Ronald
I took a bit of
Me too, an maybe other people on the list are interested in knowing
your effort result and maybe appreciate a guide on the topic.
Thank you
Leandro
2012/1/13 Ronald Cepres rbcep...@gmail.com:
Hi Ishfaq,
Thanks for your reply. I've already started trying the XMPP method so I
can't help you
Hi Ronald
I took a bit of interest in your problem as I'm going to have to be
doing the same thing in a few weeks.
oenais is in the yum repositories so you can install from there if using
redhat/centos based OS
It is also in apt repositories if you're using a debian based OS
Let me know how
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for your suggestion.
On the website of OpenAIS, it seems that it is not supported anymore and
their download links (FTP and SVN) are broken (been trying it for about a
month now). Is it still possible to use OpenAIS method? The other solution
on the wiki is using XMPP which is
Hi,
I had some problems with sip peers losing connection suddenly without real
network issues. In my case, it was useful to refresh the table used for
real time configuration, we made an script for Postgres like this
PGUSER=user PGPASSWORD=password vacuumdb --full --table 'sip_buddies'
On 11/16/2011 04:18 AM, Ronald Cepres wrote:
Hi all,
Do you have an idea on the best way on how to implement a system with
multiple Asterisk servers with BLF working in such a way that a peer on
one server can subscribe to another peer on the other server in a
seamless manner? Has anyone set-up
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 2:13 PM, viswavardhanreddy karna
viswavardhanre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi every one,
I am doing some experiments on asterisk server
performance.. How can we know server performance? can any one explain me
plz
I have 2 doubts regarding the
HI,
The way you said is correct, we are using SIPp to generate as many
calls as it can send and and the server is able is to take simultaneously of
560 - 570 calls
1. when we kept server for some time as idle it took 575 calls
2. when we kept again server as busy by continous calls back
Hi,
I mean when the cpu history is in idel and in busy state...
i have one more doubt that we are doing experiments on server
performance(only on software) it does not depends on hardware or even on
systemm/...
knowing the server performance only the software side includes any
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:28 AM, viswavardhanreddy karna
viswavardhanre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I mean when the cpu history is in idel and in busy state...
i have one more doubt that we are doing experiments on server
performance(only on software) it does not depends on hardware or
screenshots as well :)
Best Regards,
Sevana Oy
http://www.sevana.fi
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Latham lath...@gmail.com
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Juan C. Villa wrote:
On 2/28/2010 10:21 AM, Gordon Henderson wrote:
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, Juan C. Villa wrote:
Hey Guys,
I am considering leasing a new server in Germany to run my Asterisk
infrastructure and I was wondering how response time would affect the
performance
...@gatech.edu
(404)441-9653
- Original Message -
From: Gordon Henderson
[mailto:gordon+aster...@drogon.net]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion [mailto:asterisk-us...@lists.digium.com]
Sent:
Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:52:51 -0800
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Server
response time
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Juan C. Villa wrote:
Gordon,
Thank you very much for the detailed insights! I really appreciate it.
I'm gonna test drive a server in Germany today. The main reason for
choosing a server in Germany is COST ($65 vs $200).
I'm very surprised to hear that co-lo's in the US
On 3/2/2010 12:29 PM, Gordon Henderson wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Juan C. Villa wrote:
Gordon,
Thank you very much for the detailed insights! I really appreciate it.
I'm gonna test drive a server in Germany today. The main reason for
choosing a server in Germany is COST ($65 vs $200).
On 2/28/2010 10:21 AM, Gordon Henderson wrote:
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, Juan C. Villa wrote:
Hey Guys,
I am considering leasing a new server in Germany to run my Asterisk
infrastructure and I was wondering how response time would affect the
performance of the system. Right now I have a
Juan C. Villa a écrit :
[...]
The total lag from Germany to USA (2 way) is around ~110ms (Just tested
it today). Who this cause any issues with my VoIP applications? Right
now I have two VoIP boxes installed in Switzerland which are connected
to my server in California (avg response time =
Juan C. Villa a écrit :
Hey Guys,
HI Juan
I am considering leasing a new server in Germany to run my Asterisk
infrastructure and I was wondering how response time would affect the
performance of the system. Right now I have a response time of around
60-70ms with my server in
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, Juan C. Villa wrote:
Hey Guys,
I am considering leasing a new server in Germany to run my Asterisk
infrastructure and I was wondering how response time would affect the
performance of the system. Right now I have a response time of around
60-70ms with my server in
How is your network structured?
Can you show me a sample entry from your sip.conf?
I was having this problem. But as far as I could tell there wasn't
one. From a network stand point all phones were reachable asterisk
was just reporting that it was Unreachable and it wasn't sending the
Paul Scott wrote:
How is your network structured?
we have a central location where the * server is located. and 4 remote
locations connected via point to point lines.
Can you show me a sample entry from your sip.conf?
we use realtime sip w/ mysql tables. a typical entry would looks
like this:
Hi,
Using AMI, when a peer is set with Qualify=yes, it seems you can't make a
difference between First-time registration and Re-registration. Looking at
an AMI log, I saw:
Re-registration (to be confirmed):
Event: PeerStatus
Privilege: system,all
ChannelType: SIP
Peer: SIP/7266
PeerStatus:
You should be able to do this either via a system command or an AGI.
_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Olivier
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 9:30 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
2009/10/8 Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com
You should be able to do this either via a system command or an AGI.
How ?
When a phone registers for the first time, IMHO, no part of dialplan is
launched, is it ?
Using AMI to be notified of such registrations must be possible but I don't
know if
.
_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Olivier
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 11:20 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Server-side scripting when SIP phones
H Oliver,
You may be able use AMI to catch the Register event (PeerStatus or Registry -
depending on what you're trying to do and how often you need to do it) and
SIPpeers to get the device address.
YMMV.
For example, when a SIP device registers to asterisk for the first time, you
see the
On 04/08/09 23:57, Miguel Molina wrote:
Edwin Quijada escribió:
It depends about your traffic.
But myabe and I guess Core 2Duo 4Gb ram , Sata 160Gb
+_
It's pretty well known that asterisk is CPU intensive, not RAM
intensive. It think 4GB is much more than enough. BTW, if your asterisk
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Mr. Rodriguez wrote:
I am about to initiate to prove asterisk, but that I need a Server
linux, that requirements recommend to me that it has my Server? we will
use, it for recording of calls. and reports of calls
Please hire a consultant who knows enough about project
It depends about your traffic.
But myabe and I guess Core 2Duo 4Gb ram , Sata 160Gb
+_
*---*
*-Edwin Quijada
*-Developer DataBase
*-JQ Microsistemas
*-Soporte PostgreSQL
*-www.jqmicrosistemas.com
*-809-849-8087
Edwin Quijada escribió:
It depends about your traffic.
But myabe and I guess Core 2Duo 4Gb ram , Sata 160Gb
+_
It's pretty well known that asterisk is CPU intensive, not RAM
intensive. It think 4GB is much more than enough. BTW, if your asterisk
is consuming more than 150-200MB of RAM and
Look like good. I have an similar server for 100 ext.
Regards,
Luis Morales
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Elliot Murdock murdo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everybody!
I am currently setting up an Asterisk server for medium to high load
(approximately 20-35 concurrent phone lines).
Do you
Elliot Murdock wrote:
Hello Everybody!
I am currently setting up an Asterisk server for medium to high load
(approximately 20-35 concurrent phone lines).
Do you think the following specs will sufficiently satisfy this system?
CPU: XeonQC3220 2.4GHZ 8M
RAM: 2X2GB/800
Harddrive: 1X250GB
Hello!
Oh, yes, I will be mirroring the harddrives in case of any failures.
What is your opinion about using (software) RAID? Do you think the
overhead impacts performance too much?
In an ideal situation, I would use hardware RAID, but that is not
feasible right now.
Thanks,
Elliot
On Sun,
On 8 Mar 2009, at 17:04, Elliot Murdock wrote:
What is your opinion about using (software) RAID? Do you think the
overhead impacts performance too much?
There *should* be very little disk access if you get it right. We run
plenty of voice stuff on software raid. Wouldn't worry.
Steve
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Elliot Murdock wrote:
Hello!
Oh, yes, I will be mirroring the harddrives in case of any failures.
What is your opinion about using (software) RAID? Do you think the
overhead impacts performance too much?
In an ideal situation, I would use hardware RAID, but that is not
Hello!
There will be disk writing in these areas:
1. Logs
2. CDRs
3. MYSQL Call logs
4. Faxes and voicemail
Also, there will be a lot of codec encoding/decoding from/to the PRI
devices, which is my main concern with CPU load.
Cheers,
Elliot
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Gordon Henderson
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Elliot Murdock wrote:
Hello!
There will be disk writing in these areas:
1. Logs
2. CDRs
3. MYSQL Call logs
4. Faxes and voicemail
I'd not consider these to be a heavy load myself...
Also, there will be a lot of codec encoding/decoding from/to the PRI
devices, which is
Hello Gordon,
Aside from alaw and ulaw, we also use G729.
I am not that familiar as to how Asterisk converts PRI signals into
coded format, but why wouldn't any transcoding be necessary for alaw
and ulaw codecs?
Regards,
Elliot
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Gordon Henderson
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Elliot Murdock wrote:
Hello Gordon,
Aside from alaw and ulaw, we also use G729.
I am not that familiar as to how Asterisk converts PRI signals into
coded format, but why wouldn't any transcoding be necessary for alaw
and ulaw codecs?
It shouldn't have to convert them as
On 9/03/2009 8:08 a.m., Elliot Murdock wrote:
Hello Gordon,
Aside from alaw and ulaw, we also use G729.
I am not that familiar as to how Asterisk converts PRI signals into
coded format, but why wouldn't any transcoding be necessary for alaw
and ulaw codecs?
Because a T1 uses mulaw and an
Am Dienstag, den 27.01.2009, 11:30 +0100 schrieb nik600:
Hi to all
i'm planning the migration of a company on Asterisk, i have planned
this scenario:
2 server with
* 4 GB RAM
* 2 CPU 64 bit dual core
* RAID 1
* 2 network interfaces 1000 Mbit/s
Each server will have a virtual
If you use reinvites (the peers are all internal, right?), definitely.
Without reinvites - maybe.
On Jan 27, 2009, at 5:30 AM, nik600 nik...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi to all
i'm planning the migration of a company on Asterisk, i have planned
this scenario:
2 server with
* 4 GB RAM
* 2 CPU 64
on kernel boot parameters do it:
acpi=off
Regards,
Luis Morales
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Plugworld plugwo...@micnes.com wrote:
Hi All
I'm having some serious kernel panic while using digium cards.
It may be related to IRQ shared.
Can this cause a lot of drop call and bad
Well, we're running an asterisk 1.4.x system with a te220 span adapter
(T1 PRI). 83 internal SIP peers, mostly Polycom Soundpoint IP series
phones. It's a single-CPU dual-core Pentium E6420. The OS is CentOS 4.5
(x86_64). Seems to work well, though it's only busy with call switching,
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, nb wrote:
What cpu/memmory configurations have people had good luck with for a
small office asterisk server... (polycom's/poe linksys)
Dell's got their $200 SC440 going again until the 12th... and I'm
thinking it might be just the ticket...
You want to google 'asterisk
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Jon Weisman schrieb:
I'm planning on getting a Dell PowerEdge 1950.
All I can tell is that I have bad experiences with those Dell
PowerEdges. A standard Debian Etch install (2.6.18 kernel I think)
didn't even have the driver to run the network
Jerry Geis wrote:
I have a box running asterisk 1.4.17 that had been working.
it has 2 uniden phones connected on it.
This was working and now the phones dont ring when calling each other.
below is the sip debug. I cant see why the other phone does not ring?
I also tried changing the
snip
Based on the SIP debug included here, it appears that Asterisk is not
receiving
a response to the INVITE it is sending to 522 (192.168.1.99). Since the phone
is
not ringing, it makes me suspect that for some reason the linksys is
preventing
the INVITE from reaching the phone.
If I am right I think you will find that you will not have enough power to
run 4e1 with g729 codec on little 1950..
Sam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Weisman
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 3:08 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Jon Weisman schrieb:
I'm planning on getting a Dell PowerEdge 1950.
All I can tell is that I have bad experiences with those Dell
PowerEdges. A standard Debian Etch install (2.6.18 kernel I think)
didn't even have the driver to run the network interface.
At least Dell doesn't seem to play nice
Philipp Kempgen schrieb:
Jon Weisman schrieb:
I'm planning on getting a Dell PowerEdge 1950.
All I can tell is that I have bad experiences with those Dell
PowerEdges. A standard Debian Etch install (2.6.18 kernel I think)
didn't even have the driver to run the network interface.
But
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Jon Weisman schrieb:
I'm planning on getting a Dell PowerEdge 1950.
All I can tell is that I have bad experiences with those Dell
PowerEdges. A standard Debian Etch install (2.6.18 kernel I think)
didn't even have the driver to run the network interface.
At least
We are using few dell 1950, it been two year and never had any issue,
Jai
www.didforsale.com
*Buy SIP DIDs all Over US at low cost, unlimited minutes
http://www.didforsale.com;
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Jon Weisman schrieb:
Jon Weisman wrote:
All,
I'm planning on getting a Dell PowerEdge 1950. We want to use our Digium
TE410P card, calls will come in TDM and go out VoIP, we will require to
compress them using G729. What specs do I need to support for 4 E-1's with
cdr logging to mysql? We're thinking about
Matt,
Thanks for the input. I have done this. The issue is that the
onboard network controllers share IRQ with the PCI slots. Although I
have had 0 issues until now, because I moved everything so 1 PCI slot
was independent, the box cannot support a second card and everything
else. I
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 07:55:32AM -0500, Cavanna, Richard wrote:
I am having a issues with adding a analog card to my dell 2800. I
already have a t1 card installed and running fine but when I install the
analog card asterisk will not start (ztcfg fails). I have determined it
is because of a
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Cavanna, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having a issues with adding a analog card to my dell 2800. I
already have a t1 card installed and running fine but when I install the
analog card asterisk will not start (ztcfg fails). I have determined it
is
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 07:55:32AM -0500, Cavanna, Richard wrote:
I am having a issues with adding a analog card to my dell 2800. I
already have a t1 card installed and running fine but when I install
the
analog card asterisk will not start (ztcfg fails). I have determined
it
is because of a
: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 11:04 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Server recommendation help
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 07:55:32AM -0500, Cavanna, Richard wrote:
I am having a issues with adding a analog card to my dell 2800. I
already have a t1 card installed
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Steve Totaro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Cavanna, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Cards I have installed:
Digium TE205P - 5v
TDM410
I hear rave reviews about Supermicro but no personal experience.
I like
It is my understanding that the cast majority of the compatibility
issues went away with the recent chipset change on the digium cards.
Soa compatibility list really isn't needed.
I've run the digium cards on all manner of Dell hardware (from
old-school desktops all the way to the high end
Thanks. I am getting a dual 3.0Ghz 2950 III.
On 1/31/08, Erik Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is my understanding that the cast majority of the compatibility
issues went away with the recent chipset change on the digium cards.
Soa compatibility list really isn't needed.
I've run
Stephen Kratzer wrote:
Howdy. I've been having trouble finding a fairly modern server that meets the
following requirements:
- Molex power connectors (don't want to use the Digium FXS power supply)
- 4 PCI slots, one full-length (TDM2400P, 2xT100P, additional NIC)
- dual power supplies
-
We are at about 250 days of 24/7 uptime now. It would be more but we had a
long power outage and the UPS's ran out. We are using Sangoma cards though.
You can easily substitute the 2U for a 3U but I don't think you need it.
Qty 1 Supermicro SC823T-R500LP, 2U, redundant 500W ps w/ PFC, 6x1 SATA
We have used the 1950's and 2950's in previous installations, and they
work well.
The main Dell issue is compatibility with the TE110P.
PaulH
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 22:35 -0400, Forrest Beck wrote:
I am looking to install a system with 200 phones (polycom). There
will be about 30-40
I think you can do this with outlook. Use the Third Lane dialer product,
set your extension to that of the conference, then initiate the calls.
It will call the extension then the party and connect the two.
--
Chris Mason
(264) 497-5670 Fax: (264) 497-8463
Int: (305) 704-7249 Fax:
I've got a Dell SC440 running just fine with a Digium TDM-400 card in
it. It's running CentOS-64bit.
Mark Edwards wrote:
Does anyone on list have experience with Digium hardware in the following
servers:
Dell poweredge SC440
IBM xSeries x226
Have just had major hassles getting TE205P ISDN
Thanks Joe. Although youre card isn't quite the same as the one I am trying
to use you've given me a possible idea to play around with - to try and get
the 64 bit stuff going and see if that has some sort of positive effect...
Still out there looking for someone with a 205, 207, 405 or 407 in
Imran M Yousuf wrote:
Dear Users,
*I am fairly new to Digium and Asterisk. I wanted to know that if I
use the Digium product THREE Digium Wildcard TE412Ps’ (Quad E1 Card)
how many calls can I handle simultaneously.*
I want to use the cards with the following Configurations:
/Intel®
Hello,
I'm working with supermicro servers, for the irq problems with Dell, any people have problems
Regards
On 10/30/06, Paul Hales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many analog lines are you looking at? Hundreds?PaulHOn Mon, 2006-10-30 at 17:22 -0600, Joe Dennick wrote:
We have a number of clients
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 13:52 -0500, Carlos Rojas wrote:
Hello,
I'm working with supermicro servers, for the irq problems with Dell,
any people have problems
I second the supermicro servers - particularly the opteron range based on
Serverworks HS1000 chipset.
Excellent stuff. Well
I'm working with Supermicro as well.
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 10:53 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Server Recommendations
Hello,
I'm working
Like Carlos said, the SuperMicro are very good servers, however I don't have a VAR I could recommend on those, as I assume you don't want to put them together.I'll also recommend Tyan, we use some of their 1U gear and its been working flawlessly, but again no VAR to recommend as we build them
Joe
While having done this before I am rather unhappy with current
offerings. A 4U or bigger HP DL5XX for example will run you upwards
of 10k. While they are some nice machines I am currently building my
own. You may want to contact Rhino about there new servers, I feel
that they are filling
How many analog lines are you looking at? Hundreds?
PaulH
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 17:22 -0600, Joe Dennick wrote:
We have a number of clients who will be needing a server to host
Asterisk on. Many of these clients use analog (FXO) lines that will
need to be connected to Asterisk via Sangoma
I've narrowed it down to 2 configs,
It wil either be a dual:
Intel xeon dual core 3.73Ghz 1066 2x2MB cache
or a dual:
AMD Opteron DUAL CORE 285 (2.6GHz 32/64bit)
So effectively there will be 4 real CPU cores to handle processes/transcoding.
* Are there any numbers on how many (SIP-SIP) Alaw to
I am curious as to what hardware folks are using successfully from HP
or DELL. I will likely be running just a quad span T1 card with the
system.
HP DL380 G4, 4GB mem, 2x 146GB U320 in RAID1, dual hotswap PS
HP DL360 G4, 2GB mem, 2x 146GB U320 in RAID1, dual hotswap PS
Some Dell
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:17:07PM +0200, Woodoo People .pGa! wrote:
btw: i prefer HP servers (above 3xx) because you can do health monitoring
really nice (fans, temp, ps status, etc)
configure lm_sensors on just about any system built in the recent years
and you'll get those.
--
Tzafrir
Keyboardot ragadtam, hogy va'laszoljak Tzafrir Cohen osszedobalt bytejaira:
btw: i prefer HP servers (above 3xx) because you can do health monitoring
really nice (fans, temp, ps status, etc)
configure lm_sensors on just about any system built in the recent years
and you'll get those.
On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 13:17 +0200, Woodoo People .pGa! wrote:
I am curious as to what hardware folks are using successfully from HP
or DELL. I will likely be running just a quad span T1 card with the
system.
HP DL380 G4, 4GB mem, 2x 146GB U320 in RAID1, dual hotswap PS
HP DL360
[Still Off-topic]
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 09:03:42PM +0200, Woodoo People .pGa! wrote:
Keyboardot ragadtam, hogy va'laszoljak Tzafrir Cohen osszedobalt bytejaira:
btw: i prefer HP servers (above 3xx) because you can do health monitoring
really nice (fans, temp, ps status, etc)
I've had an HP Proliant DL-360 G2 (Pentium IV - 3 GHz with 1 GB memory)
in production for a couple of years with 20 Cisco phones and a single
T-1. The load is generally nill. I've never seen the load over 1.0, its
usually more like 0.1. It is also recording (in WAV format) all inbound
calls
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 10:57 -0400, David Sampson wrote:
Hello –
I am curious as to what hardware folks are using successfully from HP
or DELL. I will likely be running just a quad span T1 card with the
system.
HP DL380 G4, 4GB mem, 2x 146GB U320 in RAID1, dual hotswap PS
HP DL360 G4, 2GB
I have setup a Quad T-1 on a Dell 850 but it trunks all calls to a main voip server that is a Dell 2850. We chose to use a Sangoma T-1 card to side step some of the possible problems with motherboards/Dell servers that Patrick mentioned.
On 8/16/06, Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed,
Dell PE 1800s are our standard build. They
are tower or Rack capable, have 3 open slots for expansion (2 if you get the
remote access card). They are big though (5U) which is both a good and a
bad thing. Good in that they have GREAT air flow inside the system so
there is rarely any concern
You said there are 3 asterisk servers in your system. Are you using
ARA? Is it a multi-asterisk configuration?
Do you mean to tell the configuration of your environment?
On 7/12/06, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming a standard usage rate of 10-15%, that's 2,400 concurrent
For redundancy on the PRI side, we plug our PRIs into Redfone
Networks' foneBRIDGE boxes. They've worked quite well for us. As
others have stated, use short registration periods combined with some
HA software to handle your SIP redundancy. You might also look into
load-balancing SER proxies.
:
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Server redundancy
Alejandro,
doesn't sound like you've read up or done research on ARA (Asterisk
Realtime Architecture)? That's what allows you to build asterisk
server clusters which draw upon configs either
:
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Server redundancy
unplug, thanks for pointing that out as well as opposed to or in
complement with ARA where you can either implement DUNDi between
clusters of Asterisk servers or have a redundant pair of DUNDi lookup
Interesting points on both messages
1) as far as multiple asterisk servers talking to the same database is
concerned, I will have to test this out. I know nothing about the
database side of things, and a newbie on asterisk and linux so I have
no idea what and where the development of either of
I have asked about it here. As Douglas said, it doesn't support
mult-asterisk in current version.
However, I have questions about why multi-asterisk so difficult to implement.
1. As we can use ARA to store all information, sip user register info,
dial plan ... to DB. All asterisks can use ARA to
Keep us posted! You have a good real
world load with some decent horsepower behind it so it will be interesting to
see how your temporary changes you have planned in the next few days pan outI
suspect the SOHO switches could be part of the problem.
What is the load on the server?
I'm 100% sure that your problem is the call recording.
Disable it for some minutes to see for yourself.
Zoa
Bill Gibbs wrote:
Keep us posted! You have a good real world load with some decent
horsepower behind it so it will be interesting to see how your
temporary changes you have planned
Mitch Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over the last few months, our call center has grown considerably and we're
now experiencing choppy calls and dropped calls under full capacity.
...
All calls recorded to disk
...
72 Ploycom 301P SIP phones using ulaw codec
If you run this command
vmstat
-Original Message-
From: RR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 12:45 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Server redundancy
Interesting points on both messages
1) as far as multiple asterisk servers
What about having the softphone/hardphones configured with a Main Asterisk
server and an Alternative Asterisk Server?.
I just did a couple of tests with a Cisco ATA 186 and worked quit well after
changing the RegInterval and Alternative Proxy Timeout.
thks,
Alejandro,
On Tuesday 11 July 2006
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
